Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I'm hoping there will be more and "better" QBs than Cook so we don't have to trade up to far to get him.

agree! 2016 mock shows Cardale first but so many variables to play out.
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

agree! 2016 mock shows Cardale first but so many variables to play out.

 

 

yea that kid from USC too. The kid from Louisville is a big, big armed guy.

 

You got a link for 2016 QBs draft rankings?

Posted (edited)

 

 

yea that kid from USC too. The kid from Louisville is a big, big armed guy.

 

You got a link for 2016 QBs draft rankings?

Just saw one today, a meaningless mock but fwiw. Bosa Shrug in the tweet means you know what on his ranking!

 

@SBNationNFL: The 2015 NFL Draft is over, which means it's time for the first 2016 mock draft ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ http://t.co/kYAIcxwIvt http://t.co/Q93n63Gevl

Edited by YoloinOhio
Posted

IMO, Leodis is the most likely player to be traded. If Whaley liked Darby that much, he isn't sitting. Lots of teams need CB's. Let's go back to the Philly well. Leodis and Manuel for Bradford.

Posted

IMO, Leodis is the most likely player to be traded. If Whaley liked Darby that much, he isn't sitting. Lots of teams need CB's. Let's go back to the Philly well. Leodis and Manuel for Bradford.

maybe so but whaley really likes to redshirt guys and it is usually best for CBs who will be put on an island like in this scheme to not start right away unless their technique is NFL ready. His isn't, so I think he spends the year with Donnie Henderson and only plays if there is an injury. Jmo.
Posted

Just saw one today, a meaningless mock but fwiw. Bosa Shrug in the tweet means you know what on his ranking!

 

@SBNationNFL: The 2015 NFL Draft is over, which means it's time for the first 2016 mock draft ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ http://t.co/kYAIcxwIvt http://t.co/Q93n63Gevl

 

found this on QBs

 

 

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/dennis-dodd/25167428/the-10-qbs-well-talk-about-when-the-2016-nfl-draft-rolls-around

but it's Petty

 

don't jinx it man!

Posted

IMO, Leodis is the most likely player to be traded. If Whaley liked Darby that much, he isn't sitting. Lots of teams need CB's. Let's go back to the Philly well. Leodis and Manuel for Bradford.

Whaley said today, although everything is fluid of course, that Darby was not going to play right away and they didn't think of him as challenging for a starting job. But of course it's possible they determine Leodis is expendable or Graham could start with Darby and Robey #3 and #4.

Posted (edited)

How about McKelvin for alex mack? Pettine knows McKelvin and word is mack has a reason for an opt out clause. He or wood could play G.

Mack is definitely only going to play Center. I think you would need to give up more than McKelvin. Mack is an all-pro level talent. Browns won't just give him away, even though they drafted his replacement. Also - do you want his contract? He makes like 10m/yr and wants more.

Edited by Cleveland Rocks?
Posted

Mack is definitely only going to play Center. I think you would need to give up more than McKelvin. Mack is an all-pro level talent. Browns won't just give him away, even though they drafted his replacement. Also - do you want his contract? He makes like 10m/yr and wants more.

According to rotoworld he has a no trade clause too. I didn't know his contract was so big. Although if he's willing to opt out, he wants to win and may be more flexible about salary.

Posted

According to rotoworld he has a no trade clause too. I didn't know his contract was so big. Although if he's willing to opt out, he wants to win and may be more flexible about salary.

I bet that was part of the transition tag offer sheet from Jax that Cleveland matched.

Posted (edited)

I think Andrew Whitworth could be on the block in Cincy, and he can play G (his best spot) or T. He is frustrated they won't talk extension and he's coming up on FA. They also just drafted OTs in the first 2 rounds. What do they need? Good question, their roster is very good. I would say some help stopping the run, not sure what we could give up from that aspect.

Edited by YoloinOhio
Posted

I think Andrew Whitworth could be on the block in Cincy, and he can play G (his best spot) or T. He is frustrated they won't talk extension and he's coming up on FA. They also just drafted OTs in the first 2 rounds. What do they need? Good question, their roster is very good. I would say some help stopping the run, not sure what we could give up from that aspect.

 

Alex Carrington

Posted

I think Andrew Whitworth could be on the block in Cincy, and he can play G (his best spot) or T. He is frustrated they won't talk extension and he's coming up on FA. They also just drafted OTs in the first 2 rounds. What do they need? Good question, their roster is very good. I would say some help stopping the run, not sure what we could give up from that aspect.

 

 

Edge rusher is their biggest need they didn't address in the draft. Their defense was really bad creating pressure last year. We don't really have one of those to spare.

 

 

Love the Martellus Bennett for Leodis deal (though I'm not sure if the value is quite there for the Bears). Bennett gives us a big "homeless man's Gronk" type TE next to Clay (more of a move TE).

 

I hate the Cowboys, but I'd love to ship Freddie there to allow him to end his career with his hometown team and give us back a 5th round pick next year, solving our RB log jam. (I know many fans would revolt, but that's the one place that's a good story from Fred's side and he's redundant with the skills of other guys we have).

 

If Alex Boone is on the block, he's my top realistic offensive line trade target. McKelvin for Boone suits me pretty well.

×
×
  • Create New...