Coach Tuesday Posted May 3, 2015 Posted May 3, 2015 Except that they drafted OL (a guard specifically) with 1 of their top 2 picks this year, and they drafted 3 OLmen last year...so that line of logic doesn't quite add up. I wanted an OL or DL guy at 50...at least they got a competitor at LG at 81. They value the position plenty - they just repeatedly mis-value it.
thebandit27 Posted May 3, 2015 Posted May 3, 2015 They value the position plenty - they just repeatedly mis-value it. I don't necessarily disagree with that. I do think that they got a good, safe player at OG with Miller, so that's a plus. We'll see what comes of Henderson, Richardson, and Kouandjio
Kirby Jackson Posted May 3, 2015 Posted May 3, 2015 They value the position plenty - they just repeatedly mis-value it. If it makes you feel any better they are much worse at evaluating QBs than they are OL.
GunnerBill Posted May 3, 2015 Posted May 3, 2015 Fisher is slide protection tackle.......roman is smash mouth. Im fine with the Bill's selecting Darby at 50th. Ryan sees the world class speed off cb blitz with Darby forcing AFC QBS to respect his speed and pro style coverage from FSU. Yea I don't see Fisher as a fit for what the Bills want to do either. I expected us to go O-Line, but I expected it to be AJ Cann at guard. In the end they wnet with Miller in the third... let's see how that plays out.
Superb Owl Posted May 3, 2015 Posted May 3, 2015 If it makes you feel any better they are much worse at evaluating QBs than they are OL. Bwawawhahahaha.
Recommended Posts