JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 "tied" with Cinci, above Houston, San Diego http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000485792/article/roster-reset-recap-patriots-colts-atop-afc the Bills get elevated into the mix for drastically improving themselves this offseason. The battle for the final playoff spots in this conference will be fascinating to watch.
H2o Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 "tied" with Cinci, above Houston, San Diego http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000485792/article/roster-reset-recap-patriots-colts-atop-afc Until San Diego loses Rivers on draft day.
PaattMaann Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 Until San Diego loses Rivers on draft day. Then we would still be above them.....
H2o Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 Then we would still be above them..... Yes, I was just saying that San Diego will fall out of that discussion.
K D Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 We are better than Pitt and Denver talent-wise. Probably best roster in the NFL if you don't factor in the QB position imo.
John from Riverside Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 In my opinion we would destroy the Bengals at this point.....and their QB looks VERY average without Green to throw to
beastman Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 if i could take a pill and fall asleep right now and wake up in time for bills season opener id gladly skip the next 4.5 months of my life to watch this team! LETS GO BUFFALO!
Jets Hater Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 We are better than Pitt and Denver talent-wise. Probably best roster in the NFL if you don't factor in the QB position imo. Unfortunately, the QB is a huge part of the roster. I'm not sure if we played Denver or Pittsburgh 10 times, we would win more than 5 against each team. They have #7 and # 18. We have..well, you know what we have.
NoSaint Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 Unfortunately, the QB is a huge part of the roster. I'm not sure if we played Denver or Pittsburgh 10 times, we would win more than 5 against each team. They have #7 and # 18. We have..well, you know what we have. i always like the "what would a 10 game set look like" kind of standard for gauging teams. it also is good for penciling in a final record (if 3-7, ill put 3 tenths of a win in and total up a number for my final over/under) talking a single game i find myself talking into the "oh yea we could totally beat them" trap. we could beat any team though, some are just a lot less likely.
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 i always like the "what would a 10 game set look like" kind of standard for gauging teams. it also is good for penciling in a final record (if 3-7, ill put 3 tenths of a win in and total up a number for my final over/under) talking a single game i find myself talking into the "oh yea we could totally beat them" trap. we could beat any team though, some are just a lot less likely. Exactly. 8/10 Green Bay beats Buffalo last year. 9/10 Buffalo beats Oakland. Both were trap games for the losing team.
IslandBillsFan Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 I used the "% of 10 games" strategy and came up with 9.2 total wins for 2015. Using my normal just 1 game prediction I come up with 10-11 wins. A little disappointing. When I get to a PC I will break down my rationale.
Big Turk Posted April 17, 2015 Posted April 17, 2015 Exactly. 8/10 Green Bay beats Buffalo last year. 9/10 Buffalo beats Oakland. Both were trap games for the losing team. For the millionth time there are no such things as trap games. A long, lengthy study was conducted by Football Outsiders showing that teams won the same percentage of "trap games" as they do any other games. In fact the winning percentage for "trap games" was slightly higher
Kelly the Dog Posted April 18, 2015 Posted April 18, 2015 For the millionth time there are no such things as trap games. A long, lengthy study was conducted by Football Outsiders showing that teams won the same percentage of "trap games" as they do any other games. In fact the winning percentage for "trap games" was slightly higher Perhaps, but I would consider that a "trap study" and researchers went in there assuming they were going to find those results and ended up over confident, sloppy, and well, losers. Their criterion for what exactly was a "trap game" was ridiculous. So I'm not counting it. Because 8/10 times they would have come up with different results.
John from Riverside Posted April 18, 2015 Posted April 18, 2015 For all the posters talking about how other teams could be the bills in "8 out of 10 games" or whatever We shut down 2 HOF QBs with our defense last year......just made them look aweful. With this defense.....we had a chance to beat anybody With the improves to this offense......well.....lets just see
BuffaloBill Posted April 18, 2015 Posted April 18, 2015 The Bills are a guard an QB away from having an unbelievable roster...
3rdand12 Posted April 18, 2015 Posted April 18, 2015 The Bills are a guard an QB away from having an unbelievable roster... This might be pretty damned close to true !
rfk Posted April 18, 2015 Posted April 18, 2015 if i could take a pill and fall asleep right now and wake up in time for bills season opener id gladly skip the next 4.5 months of my life to watch this team! LETS GO BUFFALO! Dude get a life ....it don't last forever
vincec Posted April 18, 2015 Posted April 18, 2015 The Bills are a guard an QB away from having an unbelievable roster... And still would not have the best team in the division.
thewildrabbit Posted April 18, 2015 Posted April 18, 2015 The Bills are a guard an QB away from having an unbelievable roster... and a RT IMO. But that QB position is the key to being an average team or successful playoff team. Like I've stated in other threads. Had the Bills obtained OG Jahri Evans, RT Brian Bulaga this years team could very well be a serious contender in the AFC East.
Recommended Posts