Chef Jim Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 You are saying the scientists are wrong? Ok They could be. Sure. If you think anything they've come up with to date is anything more than a hypothesis then you're proving my point that you don't always think for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Which video was heavily edited. Please provide proof. We'll wait. You'll wait forever LA, he cannot provide anything. The doctored narrative on the Left is here to stay no matter what..................they simply cannot face reality a forensic analysis said the videos ‘are authentic and show no evidence of manipulation or editing.'” A question looming over the hearing was whether any of the footage was in fact altered. Democrats repeatedly suggested that important passages were missing. But the Alliance Defending Freedom engaged cybersecurity and forensic analysis company Coalfire Systems to examine the 10 “full-footage videos” put out by CMP. According to their review, the videos were not manipulated. The report said any missing footage was of “non-pertinent” events like meals and bathroom breaks. Prior to this, Planned Parenthood had hired Fusion GPS, a firm which the Weekly Standard pointed out is “an opposition research firm with ties to the Democratic party and has a history of harassing socially conservative Republican donors, possibly on behalf of the Obama campaign,” to analyze the videos. Fusion backed up Planned Parenthood’s claims that the videos were doctored – or did they? Politico actually admitted that the firm found the videos to be free of manipulation (despite their misleading headline) when they broke the story on Planned Parenthood’s paid ‘research’, writing : A report commissioned by Planned Parenthood has found that the sting videos targeting its tissue donation practices contain intentionally deceptive edits, missing footage and inaccurately transcribed conversations. But there is no evidence that the anti-abortion group behind the attack made up dialogue. … But the firm also wrote that it is impossible to characterize the extent to which the edits and cuts distort the meaning of the conversations depicted and that there was no “widespread evidence of substantive video manipulation.” So that now makes two forensic analyses which have found no evidence of any kind of manipulation in the CMP videos. Despite this, Cecile Richards and her Planned Parenthood-supporting friends on Capitol Hill continued to claim that the videos were manipulated. Don't forget..............liberals think for themselves . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 You'll wait forever LA, he cannot provide anything. Maybe he was talking about some other video. He really hasn't done anything other than to make an obscure claim about a doctored video. Once he tells us which video he is referring to, I'm sure he will have proof to back up his claims. We'll wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Are you saying that the scientists are just propgandists? You are saying the scientists are wrong? Ok You're putting a lot of stock into what an Aussie punk band thinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Here's how the dems and the Left has tried to respond to the horrible, video expose' over the past 4 weeks. That video doesn't exist. It exists, but it's a hoax. It's not a hoax, but it doesn't show that. It shows that, but who cares. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Here's how the dems and the Left has tried to respond to the horrible, video expose' over the past 4 weeks. That video doesn't exist. It exists, but it's a hoax. It's not a hoax, but it doesn't show that. It shows that, but who cares. . There was a video expose of Hillary's email server? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 There was a video expose of Hillary's email server? I don't know. I'm still waiting for gatorman to tell us what video he was referencing and how he knows it was heavily edited. I'm sure he's probably busy right now reading his Land Rover manual. But we'll wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 I don't know. I'm still waiting for gatorman to tell us what video he was referencing and how he knows it was heavily edited. I'm sure he's probably busy right now reading his Land Rover manual. But we'll wait. Don't wait, the edited video was edited. Land rover??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 Don't wait, the edited video was edited. Land rover??? Some days I'm genuinely stunned you have the mental capacity to sustain your own life. Today is one of those days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 The edited video was edited? Circular logic is circular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 Some days I'm genuinely stunned you have the mental capacity to sustain your own life. Today is one of those days. Well, I don't claim to be a journalist major, business owner or christian. You saying I should lie more? The edited video was edited? Circular logic is circular. The truth is the truth and isn't edited for dishonesty http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/ “Affiliates are not looking to make money by doing this. They’re looking to serve their patients and just make it not impact their bottom line.” This is the type of backwards logic you get from people running things that have never run a business before. Not impacting their bottom line is......wait for it........making money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 Well, I don't claim to be a journalist major, business owner or christian. You saying I should lie more? The truth is the truth and isn't edited for dishonesty http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/ I'm saying it just seems, on most days, you forget to take your meds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 I'm saying it just seems, on most days, you forget to take your meds. Most days it seems like he's self-medicating with rubbing alcohol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 Most days it seems like he's self-medicating with rubbing alcohol. Troll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) The truth is the truth and isn't edited for dishonesty http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/ Dubious assertion that Planned Parenthood operates at a loss aside, this is a pile of malarkey. The issue is not whether planned parenthood as an entity turns a profit, which is neither proven nor disproven by "Fact Check", the issue is whether or not Planned Parenthood is monetizing the harvesting of human organs, which they clearly are. Edited October 2, 2015 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 Dubious assertion that Planned Parenthood operates at a loss aside, this is a pile of malarkey. The issue is not whether planned parenthood as an entity turns a profit, which is neither proven nor disproven by "Fact Check", the issue is whether or not Planned Parenthood is monetizing the harvesting of human organs, which they clearly are. Thank you for disproving a GOP talking point. Secondly, everything costs something, even if it is medical tissue, human organs, whatever. So liver transplants should not be monetized? All it should be done for free? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 Thank you for disproving a GOP talking point. Secondly, everything costs something, even if it is medical tissue, human organs, whatever. So liver transplants should not be monetized? All it should be done for free? Nothing you've said here is correct. Think it through, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 2, 2015 Share Posted October 2, 2015 Think it through, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Michigan abortion doctor apparently caught working out of his car. Great. Meet ‘Doctor’ Michael Roth – and the scare quotes do not represent me calling his medical degree into question. They represent me being appalled that I have to give him an ancient and honorable title of respect and courtesy: Why did police find containers full of pain medication and what appears to be human tissue in the trunk of a Michigan OB/GYN’s car? Answers are forthcoming and they are not going to be pleasant. Detroit’s WXYZ reports that police in the wealthy suburb of West Bloomfieldfound “14 containers of human tissue, possibly fetuses, medical equipment and large amounts of fentanyl” in the trunk of the doctor’s car after it was impounded as part of an accident investigation launched in early October. Fentanyl is a powerful painkiller often used in brief surgical procedures. See, if you’re wondering why the pro-life movement seems to be a lot less willing to trust the pro-abortion people – and, yes, there is a distinct flavor of ‘pro-abortion’ running through the Other Side these days – well, it may have something to do with the way that various and sundry abortionists keep getting caught breaking the law. And these laws are regulatory ones. It was the intent of the people of Michigan to stop people from having abortions outside of a proper facility – which this Michael Roth guy ignored. It was the intent of the people of Pennsylvania to maintain minimum standards of health, safety, and dignity – which the infamous Kermit Gosnell ignored (at least, he ignored it when his ‘patient’ wasn’t white). And it was certainly the intent of the people of the United States to not make baby harvesting into a profitable biotech industry – which, as we’re even now discovering, Planned Parenthood ignored totally. {snip} One last note: I was a toddler when Roe v. Wade was decided, but I am given to understand that a powerful argument in favor of legalized abortion back then was that it was better to have the practice legal and regulated, so that people would not have to resort to unsafe and dangerous illicit procedures. …How is that working out for us, again? Because apparently we’re still getting all of that. http://www.redstate.com/2015/10/14/abortion-michael-roth/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts