DC Tom Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 I can't believe that aborted fetuses are sold. I thought it was a hoax when I first heard it. Why wouldn't you believe it? It's medical waste at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Why wouldn't you believe it? It's medical waste at that point. The practical side of me says if you're gonna do it, make it useful or productive. The spiritual side of me strongly disagrees. I find it harder to resolve that rift as I get older Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 The practical side of me says if you're gonna do it, make it useful or productive. The spiritual side of me strongly disagrees. I find it harder to resolve that rift as I get older Point of note: I wasn't suggesting that it's okay. I was pointing out that there's no reason to believe others wouldn't think it's okay, since it is considered medical waste and gets incinerated otherwise. Much like an amputated limb...and I'd be curious to know the statutes regarding the sale of amputated limbs for research purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Point of note: I wasn't suggesting that it's okay. I was pointing out that there's no reason to believe others wouldn't think it's okay, since it is considered medical waste and gets incinerated otherwise. Much like an amputated limb...and I'd be curious to know the statutes regarding the sale of amputated limbs for research purposes. Yep, I got your drift. I assume amputated limbs would follow a process such as cadaver, donated with the cost of preserving and transporting that specimen considered. Just something about crushing fetuses around desirable components makes me feel, well, gross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 At worst there was criminal activity involved, at best the culture that prevails at Planned Parenthood is crass and lacks sensitivity when it comes to babies that are in mother's wombs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 (edited) At worst there was criminal activity involved, at best the culture that prevails at Planned Parenthood is crass and lacks sensitivity when it comes to babies that are in mother's wombs. My understanding from a legal standpoint is about profitability, which is where they get stuck because if it were not-for-profit, no one would be negotiating a price. There would be a set price and that would be the end of it. Perhaps someone who read Of Mice and Men can chime in with their superior intellect. Meanwhile, if anyone in DC has nuts, PP would be on the chopping block this very day. But we have an election coming up, and the candidates need PP to launder that baby parts money to campaigns. Edited July 24, 2015 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Just something about crushing fetuses around desirable components makes me feel, well, gross. And it wasn't some typical dumb ass chick that is a peon within their organization, it was both the president of their medical director's council and their senior medical officer. We've seen Planned Parenthood's ads, definitely uber feminism is what dominates that organization and the attitudes of these two high ranking officials I think says a lot in regards to the attitude of how they view things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 And it wasn't some typical dumb ass chick that is a peon within their organization, it was both the president of their medical director's council and their senior medical officer. We've seen Planned Parenthood's ads, definitely uber feminism is what dominates that organization and the attitudes of these two high ranking officials I think says a lot in regards to the attitude of how they view things. Do just a little reading on PP's founder Margeret Sanger and it should give you a good indication of what they are all about. She was a peach I tell yah. I figure you probably already know but just in case give her a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Companies that fund Planned Parenthood: http://dailysignal.com/2015/07/21/meet-the-41-companies-that-donate-directly-to-planned-parenthood/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 (edited) Hillary Clinton Calls Law Protecting Lives of Viable Infants 'Extreme and Unacceptable' http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-clinton-calls-law-protecting-lives-viable-infants-extreme-and-unacceptable_995623.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=20150722_TWS-blog-hillary-clinton-abortion-3_facebook.com&utm_content=TWS# This week, Wisconsin governor Scott Walker signed a law protecting the lives of infants after the fifth month of pregnancy (or 20 weeks after conception), a point in human development when babies can feel pain and survive long-term if born prematurely. The law includes an exeption for cases in which a physical health issue endangers the life of the mother, but Hillary Clinton still denounced the late-term abortion ban as an "extreme and unacceptable" measure: Clinton especially objects to the fact that Wisconsin's law doesn't include an exception to allow the killing of infants late in pregnancies that resulted from rape. But laws in the blue states of Pennsylvania and New York (which take effect, respectively, at 22 weeks and 24 weeks after conception) also prohibit late-term abortions in that circumstance. Does Clinton think liberal New York's aboriton law is also "extreme and unacceptable"? Republicans in Congress have not only tolerated the legality of abortion in pregnancies that result from rape, they have voted since 1993 for laws allowing federal Medicaid funding of abortions in these extreme cases in order to prohibit funding in more than 99 percent of other cases. But even if one accepts this exception for principled or prudential reasons, it does not follow that this exception must exist in the ninth month of pregnancy. So does Clinton support any limits on abortion? She has given conflicting answers over the years, and her campaign still hasn't answered several questions about her position on late-term abortion and taxpayer-funded abortion Scott Walker responded to Clinton with the following tweet: Scott Walker ✔ @ScottWalker .@HillaryClinton attacks me for protecting life after 5 months, but won’t condemn disgusting Planned Parenthood videos. -SW 5:44 PM - 21 Jul 2015 1,267 1,267 Retweets 1,187 . Edited July 25, 2015 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 If you can't make up your mind about whether or not to keep your baby after 20 weeks I don't know what to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 If you can't make up your mind about whether or not to keep your baby after 20 weeks I don't know what to say. "But some women don't know they're pregnant until later than 20 weeks!!!!" Yeah...if you can go four and a half months without realizing you've got a separate, parasitic organism growing in you, I don't know what to say either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 If you can't make up your mind about whether or not to keep your baby after 20 weeks I don't know what to say. Not to be too crass with this important subject, but you may or may not be sure about keeping your baby, but (after twenty weeks) you do know if you were raped or not, don't you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Not to be too crass with this important subject, but you may or may not be sure about keeping your baby, but (after twenty weeks) you do know if you were raped or not, don't you ? Or a victim of incest. So fantastic point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 "But some women don't know they're pregnant until later than 20 weeks!!!!" If you're 20 weeks pregnant and don't know it, it means that you eat with a feed bag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Hers a question, doesn't the ACA reform afford family planning reimbursements for women's services providers? Seeing the Medicaid is being expanded and people must have insurance, doesn't that PP would need far less direct support from government? I can't believe that aborted fetuses are sold. I thought it was a hoax when I first heard it. Its goddamned ghoulish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 If you're 20 weeks pregnant and don't know it, it means that you eat with a feed bag. Or a victim of incest. So fantastic point. What if you only found out you're related to your husband when a distant relative from the old country finally decides to attend the reunion? ...not to mention those women who can't figure out who's the Daddy despite appearing on Jerry Springer 10 times. ...coma patient? ...old person who thinks it's menopause? ...late bloomer who had sex early? ...wasn't always a dude? No matter how thorough the escape clause, there is always that one exception that the opposition can point out to ruin it for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Reading now that the California AG is going after the firm that caught PP on tape admitting to selling parts of crushed babies for profit. You progressives are absolute nutbags. You will not be able to silence everyone, no matter how hard you try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 (edited) If you can't make up your mind about whether or not to keep your baby after 20 weeks I don't know what to say. This is what I have a hard time seeing how in the world can one justifiably defend killing a baby after 20 weeks. You should know by the damn 20th !@#$ing week if you want to have the abortion. Even if it's rape or incest, get the damn abortion ASAP, don't !@#$ing wait 20 weeks to do it. The last election cycle Planned Parenthood and Obama had the GOP on their heels because of those moron's Aiken and Murdoch. This is a winning issue, no one is saying you can't have an abortion, just do it before they are nearly completely developed. **** man, even studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine state that babies CAN survive outside of the womb around this time period. Give the baby a chance. This issue really gets to me, I don't see how anyone can justifiably want to have an abortion this late in the game. Look it's a damn baby. Edited July 25, 2015 by Magox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Look it's a damn baby. Hillary needs to pick a different battle that pushing for women to be allowed to abort a fetus after 20 weeks. I recognize that the abortion clinics fund her campaign generously, but still... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts