Beerball Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 http://gawker.com/the-food-babe-blogger-is-full-of-****-1694902226 http://www.scibabe.com/ Who is your money on?
DC Tom Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 My money would be on JTSP over the Food Babe. The Food Babe's a !@#$ing moron. "This sounds scary...so I'm going to say it's bad." She's the damned poster child for ignorance.
boyst Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 totally scibabe. the fact that she promotes sex toys on her site - science!!!!!!
Azalin Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 Yeah, there's no contest here. Science Babe all the way.
Buftex Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 Only going on the pictures... I think foodbabe is kinda cute!
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) hmmm science babe Error establishing a database connection after searching the Sci babe is meh + food babe - meh Edited April 7, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
BuffaloBill Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 My money would be on JTSP over the Food Babe. The Food Babe's a !@#$ing moron. "This sounds scary...so I'm going to say it's bad." She's the damned poster child for ignorance. I thought you ghost wrote the article ... Dude sounds like you... totally scibabe. the fact that she promotes sex toys on her site - science!!!!!! Are you using any of them?
Dante Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 I guess the science babe. Pretty average contest though. Kinda like the Dolphins vs the Chargers
DC Tom Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 I thought you ghost wrote the article ... Dude sounds like you... Mine would have been shorter, and used "idiot" a lot more. Because anyone who can't distinguish antifreeze (propylene glycol) from seaweed (propylene glycol alginate) and isn't worth that much typing. This is a better article, anyway: http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2015/03/17/vani-hari-a-k-a-the-food-babe-responds-to-the-new-york-times-ineptly-as-usual/
plenzmd1 Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 Funny, i had never heard heard of this woman...but had heard of the Subway and Fireball stuff. Man she is getting killed in these blogs/articles
Acantha Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 It's too bad really. I think there is a lot to be concerned about regarding our food supply, but the food babe does way, way more to hurt the cause than help it. On the other hand, anyone who is so obviously using her in order to spark their own crappy writing career (science babe) doesn't deserve the attention either.
Jobu Posted April 7, 2015 Posted April 7, 2015 http://www.fabulousfarmbabe.net/ The fabulous farm babe would whip both of their arses.
BuffaloBill Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 http://www.fabulousfarmbabe.net/ The fabulous farm babe would whip both of their arses. I think you are right.....
BringBackFergy Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 Mine would have been shorter, and used "idiot" a lot more. Because anyone who can't distinguish antifreeze (propylene glycol) from seaweed (propylene glycol alginate) and isn't worth that much typing. This is a better article, anyway: http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2015/03/17/vani-hari-a-k-a-the-food-babe-responds-to-the-new-york-times-ineptly-as-usual/ That is a good article.
4merper4mer Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 The science babe used science, specifically strange camera angles, to make herself photogenic. Two sheas to her but I'd stay away.
KD in CA Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 Food babe is cuter, but Science babe would clearly be better in the bed, so I'll go with her.
Recommended Posts