Canadian Bills Fan Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/04/06/percy-harvin-the-world-hasnt-seen-me-explode-like-im-about-to/ CBF
It's in My Blood Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) I believe him. Not just because I want to, but because he's gonna have big time playmakers around him drawing attention away. He's my choice for the team offensive MVP Edited April 6, 2015 by It's in My Blood
John from Riverside Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 The most beneficial WR out of all this HAS to be Robert Woods....... With Watkins, Harvin, and Clay on the field with him Woods is gonna have a great season
Buftex Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 The most beneficial WR out of all this HAS to be Robert Woods....... With Watkins, Harvin, and Clay on the field with him Woods is gonna have a great season I actually kind of worry about how Woods..is he going to take a back seat to all these other guys?
Deranged Rhino Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I actually kind of worry about how Woods..is he going to take a back seat to all these other guys? You shouldn't worry about that. Look at Woods at USC and back in HS when Lee came onto the team. He's played with guys who've "overtaken" his spotlight and touches and still excelled. Woods is a team guy, always has been.
DC Greg Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 The most beneficial WR out of all this HAS to be Robert Woods....... With Watkins, Harvin, and Clay on the field with him Woods is gonna have a great season Take your pick on who will benefit the most. On any given play, I doubt they can cover everyone. It should be pick your poison if all these guys stay healthy.
Kemp Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 Woods remains the team's second best receiver. Easily.
NoSaint Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 Woods remains the team's second best receiver. Easily. we will see. i dont think "easily" is a fair assessment, but i think we have 3 true nfl starters now which is great.
John from Riverside Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I would like to see them pick on whatever the weakness is of the defense.........having that many good players should create a lot of mismatches on the field we will see. i dont think "easily" is a fair assessment, but i think we have 3 true nfl starters now which is great. Dont forget Clay....who is a crackerjack of a reciever
Kirby Jackson Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I think that Watkins benefits the most. Teams doubled him all over the field and rolled coverage his way all last year (according to Rex). He will still see the majority of the attention but less than last year. Couple that with his improving health and people would see what an absolute beast he is. Watkins isn't a good NFL player (like Woods or Clay). He has the ability to lead the league in receiving during his career.
eball Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 we will see. i dont think "easily" is a fair assessment, but i think we have 3 true nfl starters now which is great. I'll take that a step further...we have three WRs who could legitimately compete to be the #1 on most teams.
NoSaint Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I'll take that a step further...we have three WRs who could legitimately compete to be the #1 on most teams. sammy id agree harvin id say some teams woods i think is a #2 across the board essentially and thats not a major knock - i just think its hard to be a #1 without the ability to take the top of the defense even as the focal point of their coverage. i think woods is very good at what he does but not that type of receiver.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/04/06/percy-harvin-the-world-hasnt-seen-me-explode-like-im-about-to/ CBF as long as he explodes on the field
4BillsintheBurgh Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 sammy id agree harvin id say some teams woods i think is a #2 across the board essentially and thats not a major knock - i just think its hard to be a #1 without the ability to take the top of the defense even as the focal point of their coverage. i think woods is very good at what he does but not that type of receiver. +1
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 No, not most. Yes, I like Watkins and Woods, and though I didn't like the money we gave Harvin, he is talented. But Harvin is not a #1 WR on all but probably 4 teams, and Woods is not a #1 on every team except for probably 7. We do not have 3- #1WRs, we have a #1 in Watkins, and 2- #2WRs.
Rubes Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 All we need is an offensive line that can keep guys off of the QB, whoever it is, and we should be sitting pretty.
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 All we need is an offensive line that can keep guys off of the QB, whoever it is, and we should be sitting pretty. I'll believe "sitting pretty" when I see it. I'll just settle for "playing league-average offense" to go with our top-3 defense. We have only been there once in the last 10 years. "Sitting pretty" implies above that, and don't get your hopes up.
Bftvocal70 Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 Let's just say this is by far the most talented group of players and coaches we've had since the 90's. Woot!!
Recommended Posts