YoloinOhio Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 @SBNationNFL: The NFL passed the Ravens' ineligible receiver proposal and other rule changes: http://t.co/4Vf2mMkOQuhttp://t.co/JgoCmOJi1P
DC Tom Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Good rule change. Sad that you have to change the rules to prevent the Pats' cheating, though.
Jerry Jabber Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Glad to see the league made the change. The Ravens got a raw deal in their playoff game vs the Pats.
The Wiz Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Good rule change. Sad that you have to change the rules to prevent the Pats' cheating, though. Don't worry. They will make use of the injury time out change.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 (edited) COOL a bit too late but Edited March 25, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
YoloinOhio Posted March 25, 2015 Author Posted March 25, 2015 I think if they didn't change it then everyone would try do it, and while it technically was "legal" when the pats did it, it really was poor gamesmanship imo.
John from Riverside Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 I dont know if the pats win that game against the ravens if that doesnt happen
Beef Jerky Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Good rule change. Sad that you have to change the rules to prevent the Pats' cheating, though. Well they weren't cheating then...
DC Tom Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Well they weren't cheating then... Yeah, they were. Following the letter of the rules while violating the spirit of them is called "gaming the system," and it's considered cheating. And that's above and beyond the fact that they were violating the rules by improperly declaring eligible/ineligible status on consecutive plays, to get around the substitution rules.
Chuck Wagon Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Who will be the first linebacker to change their number to the 40s?
ALLEN1QB Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 They should put a rule in there stating any team caught cheating will not have any draft picks for 20 years.
l< j Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Who will be the first linebacker to change their number to the 40s? "42 is the Mike" just doesn't have the same ring. kj
DC Tom Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Who will be the first linebacker to change their number to the 40s? Don't know exactly, but I'm sure that 1) it'll be a Pats linebacker, and 2) they'll somehow find a way to abuse this rule, too. Prrobably something to do with lining up linebackers at tight end or something.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 (edited) part of this was that beyond there not being enough time to identify the receiver - the Purtids misused the formation on the next play immediately after. I don't recall the exact foul Edited March 25, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Owners Pass Ban On Patriots' Ineligible Receiver Trick I like that name / title better
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Yeah, they were. Following the letter of the rules while violating the spirit of them is called "gaming the system," and it's considered cheating. And that's above and beyond the fact that they were violating the rules by improperly declaring eligible/ineligible status on consecutive plays, to get around the substitution rules. By you anyway." Violating the spirit of the rules." Would love to see that one called.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 (edited) It would have been either an illegal substitution or an illegal formation. The rule violated was that a player declared eligible (or ineligible) has to leave the field and come back on to be considered the ineligible (or eligible). that's the one. He (they) played ineligible then eligible w/o leaving the field. Edited March 25, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
DC Tom Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 that's the one. And they frequently kept players declared eligible/ineligible on the field for multiple plays - the whole second half of the Ravens game, there was an offensive lineman declared eligible for more than half the plays, including several consecutive plays. But they rarely switched the players' status on the field - that happened maybe three times, and I think only the one time was it done improperly. Personally, I think a rule that a player declared eligible/ineligible for a play must be off the field for the next play would have been better. The rule they created is good, but it just makes it easier to catch this practice, rather than inhibiting it.
Mr. WEO Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Maybe this will slow down the game for Jim Harbaugh a bit.
Recommended Posts