CodeMonkey Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 Question: At or near game time, can we just go to Yahoo.com, wander around a bit, find a button that says "Click here to watch live streaming of the NFL game" and then...watch the game? I.E., do I need to sign up for some account, create a password, sign up for some free service I don't want, etc.?
Nanker Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 I'm all in favor of them providing games via streaming. It better work though and be a robust stream. I can easily see a possible train wreck though.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 @DandC Fans irked #Bills game in London won't be televised locally http://on.rocne.ws/1GnBotm #BillsLondon
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 I have one too and was planning on using it. Any trick to getting the yahoo app on it? It's on the list of available apps.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 How to watch the NFL Live Stream on Yahoo 2015 NFL Week 7 TV Schedule @PrescottRossi Our graphics guru Jeremy made this. We started getting calls about Bills/Jags yesterday. It's only the beginning.
Leroi Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 Call WROC-TV and voice your displeasure. I just did. (585) 288-8400 Imo
Gugny Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 Call WROC-TV and voice your displeasure. I just did. (585) 288-8400 Imo I thought you were going to London for the game.
Leroi Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 (edited) I thought you were going to London for the game. I am, with my laptop, tablet and phone. How will my Family watch? Imo Edited October 20, 2015 by Leroi
mikemac2001 Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 Condescending much? No the game is for everyone to watch I am out of market so I am happy I have the ability to watch this at home My uncle had a Roku 7 years before I got one they have been around for awhile so for people to complain they don't have a laptop with hdmi or a device to play it is not the nfl faults. Plus, Chromecast BLOWS in a wifi environment. I would not recommend it at all. The others or firetv (stick or box) are fine. But the easiest and cheapest is a laptop, tablet, or phone with the HDMI connection to your TV. If used it mostly from local to a Tv not streaming regarding chrome cast
Just in Atlanta Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 Good grief people: The game IS on TV. Get a smart TV, or a Roku, already, and you'll be enjoying a high-def experience. This is good news for sports fans, not bad. roku streaming stick
26CornerBlitz Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 Plus, Chromecast BLOWS in a wifi environment. I would not recommend it at all. The others or firetv (stick or box) are fine. But the easiest and cheapest is a laptop, tablet, or phone with the HDMI connection to your TV. Chromecast works great for me on my wifi network, but I guess the experience can vary widely based upon your infrastructure (ISP and Router Speed).
Max997 Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 I'm all in favor of them providing games via streaming. It better work though and be a robust stream. I can easily see a possible train wreck though. This is my biggest concern since as far as I know it will be the first live sporting event Yahoo will be streaming which makes it all the more amazing that they didnt do a trial run with another game.
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 I am, with my laptop, tablet and phone. How will my Family watch? Imo Can't you get them tickets? You are the opposing team's Offensive Line Coach assistant Head Coach.
CodeMonkey Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 Chromecast works great for me on my wifi network, but I guess the experience can vary widely based upon your infrastructure (ISP and Router Speed). I have wireless N, most up to date. What I'm watching on chrome on the desktop is fine, its when I try and tab cast (which is what I suspect this game would be) that there is a problem. Lots of stutter on the TV. Youtube and things that have support for chromecast built in does work much better. Plus I have lots of people and gadgets that suck up the wireless bandwidth at any given time. FireTV and other devices that get the stream directly rather than indirectly from another device like the chromecast does is just a better design IMO.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 (edited) I have wireless N, most up to date. What I'm watching on chrome on the desktop is fine, its when I try and tab cast (which is what I suspect this game would be) that there is a problem. Lots of stutter on the TV. Youtube and things that have support for chromecast built in does work much better. Plus I have lots of people and gadgets that suck up the wireless bandwidth at any given time. FireTV and other devices that get the stream directly rather than indirectly from another device like the chromecast does is just a better design IMO. The most up to date is Wireless AC. It also helps if you're on 5GHz as opposed to 2.4GHz. Edited October 20, 2015 by 26CornerBlitz
CodeMonkey Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 This is my biggest concern since as far as I know it will be the first live sporting event Yahoo will be streaming which makes it all the more amazing that they didnt do a trial run with another game. Bills versus Jags will have about the fewest people possible watching at 9:30AM eastern (6:30 in the west) and IS the trial run.
mikemac2001 Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 I have wireless N, most up to date. What I'm watching on chrome on the desktop is fine, its when I try and tab cast (which is what I suspect this game would be) that there is a problem. Lots of stutter on the TV. Youtube and things that have support for chromecast built in does work much better. Plus I have lots of people and gadgets that suck up the wireless bandwidth at any given time. FireTV and other devices that get the stream directly rather than indirectly from another device like the chromecast does is just a better design IMO. Desktop never worked for me but from phones or tablets no issues (chromecast) Forgot about Vizio smart tvs have it built in as well idk why people are complaining a service we would normally be charged for
CodeMonkey Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 (edited) The most up to date is Wireless AC. True enough but I cannot afford to upgrade everything in my house and I do not believe the Chromecast supports it yet. Desktop never worked for me but from phones or tablets no issues (chromecast) Forgot about Vizio smart tvs have it built in as well idk why people are complaining a service we would normally be charged for I have primarily a windows household, tablets as well as phones. Casting from Chrome pretty much sucks at least on wifi. Edited October 20, 2015 by CodeMonkey
26CornerBlitz Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 True enough but I cannot afford to upgrade everything in my house and I do not believe the Chromecast supports it yet. I have primarily a windows household, tablets as well as phones. You're right if you have a 1st generation Chromecast.
CodeMonkey Posted October 20, 2015 Posted October 20, 2015 (edited) You're right if you have a 1st generation Chromecast. Yeah i have early adopter syndrome for most gadgets But I won't get another unless they open it up a lot more than they do now. A Windows SDK at the very least, not just via chrome. Google is almost as bad as Apple. One guy had a .NET open source thing he had fairly far along, until Google shut him down. Lost a lot of respect for Google at that point. Edited October 20, 2015 by CodeMonkey
Recommended Posts