Bills Fan in MD Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 I hope Chip Kelly stays HC of the Eagles for a while. He certainly makes the offseason entertaining.
nucci Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 They clearly should be. I'm not saying he is the answer, I'm just saying that there's no way of knowing how good he's gonna be because he's only started 14 games. Anyone who says otherwise is just a Tebow hater. Agree but don't you think coaches, GMs and scouts see tape, see him practice, see him throw and can tell he is not that good?
FireChan Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 How can anyone judge a QB after 14 starts though? He was always a project coming into the NFL. QB's can get better, right? His first coach was clearly an idiot that ruined him. Ha that's funny, he has started exactly 14 games, Yes agreed, the jury is still out. Especially considering his coaches almost certainly encouraged him not to make too many mistakes. Doesn't matter. All that matters is W-L and the QB is pretty much solely responsible for whether or not a team wins. The kid won games- including a playoff game. They clearly should be. I'm not saying he is the answer, I'm just saying that there's no way of knowing how good he's gonna be because he's only started 14 games. Anyone who says otherwise is just a Tebow hater. This pleases me.
1billsfan Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 They clearly should be. I'm not saying he is the answer, I'm just saying that there's no way of knowing how good he's gonna be because he's only started 14 games. Anyone who says otherwise is just a Tebow hater. You just said in another thread today "that the verdict is not quite in yet" in regards to EJ.
metzelaars_lives Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 (edited) You just said in another thread today "that the verdict is not quite in yet" in regards to EJ. OK sarcasm off: nor is the verdict in on Tebow. Similarly however, I would be very skeptical of Tebow's chances of becoming a franchise QB. Truthfully, I think he has less of a chance than Manuel (even though Tebow's W-L record is better AND his TD-INT ratio is better, but that's neither here nor there). My point is that despite them each only having started 14 games as a pro, I reserve the right to formulate an opinion as to what I perceive to be their odds of becoming a franchise QB. I think those odds are slim for both of them. Do you think it's fair to assess Tebow's odds of becoming a franchise QB? If so, how and why is this a different scenario than Manuel? Edited March 16, 2015 by metzelaars_lives
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted March 16, 2015 Author Posted March 16, 2015 Then why aren't teams lining up to sign him to be their starting QB? Because he's a Christian. And they hate Christians. Just ask Christans like Peyton Manning, Russel Wilson and Aaron Rodgers how much persecution they get.
Gugny Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 Because he's a Christian. And they hate Christians. Just ask Christans like Peyton Manning, Russel Wilson and Aaron Rodgers how much persecution they get. How would you know Tebow is a Christian?
nucci Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 OK sarcasm off: nor is the verdict in on Tebow. Similarly however, I would be very skeptical of Tebow's chances of becoming a franchise QB. Truthfully, I think he has less of a chance than Manuel (even though Tebow's W-L record is better AND his TD-INT ratio is better, but that's neither here nor there). My point is that despite them each only having started 14 games as a pro, I reserve the right to formulate an opinion as to what I perceive to be their odds of becoming a franchise QB. I think those odds are slim for both of them. Do you think it's fair to assess Tebow's odds of becoming a franchise QB? If so, how and why is this a different scenario than Manuel? Good points but wouldn't you agree based on certain players and how they perform, that 14 games could be enough?
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted March 16, 2015 Author Posted March 16, 2015 How would you know Tebow is a Christian? I'd assume you're going somewhere with this, so I'll play along.
Luxy312 Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 Dear Chip Kelly:HAHAHAHA.....LMAO.....ROFL.<------Everyone that's not a die hard Eagles fan.
Gugny Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 OK sarcasm off: nor is the verdict in on Tebow. Similarly however, I would be very skeptical of Tebow's chances of becoming a franchise QB. Truthfully, I think he has less of a chance than Manuel (even though Tebow's W-L record is better AND his TD-INT ratio is better, but that's neither here nor there). My point is that despite them each only having started 14 games as a pro, I reserve the right to formulate an opinion as to what I perceive to be their odds of becoming a franchise QB. I think those odds are slim for both of them. Do you think it's fair to assess Tebow's odds of becoming a franchise QB? If so, how and why is this a different scenario than Manuel? It's fair to assess someone after 14 games if they've shown absolutely zero ability to be good. Tebow did that; Manuel did not. It's really that simple. I'd assume you're going somewhere with this, so I'll play along. All that proves is that he knows how to work a microphone and that he's got beautifully manicured hands.
FireChan Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 It's fair to assess someone after 14 games if they've shown absolutely zero ability to be good. Tebow did that; Manuel did not. It's really that simple. How many 4th quarter comebacks? Game winning drives? Playoff wins?
Kelly the Dog Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 "You know Tim Tebow is a virgin because of his unwillingness to try a new position."
metzelaars_lives Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 It's fair to assess someone after 14 games if they've shown absolutely zero ability to be good. Tebow did that; Manuel did not. It's really that simple. All that proves is that he knows how to work a microphone and that he's got beautifully manicured hands. Look I think Tebow sucks more than anyone on planet Earth. That being said, I live in Denver and out of his 14 starts, he had a few good ones. I remember him playing pretty well in a game at Minnesota. Again, his TD-INT ratio is better than Manuel's. I think EJ Manuel has played better than Tebow in his career- albeit not by much- but if you are allowed to say Tebow sucks after 14 starts (which I would agree with), why am I not allowed to say, "hey my gut is that it's not happening for EJ Manuel." Cause that's really all I have maintained throughout this whole thing.
Gugny Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 How many 4th quarter comebacks? Game winning drives? Playoff wins? 7 game winning drives; 6 of which were 4th quarter. Four of which were games in which he completed less that 50% of his passes. So what, though? If you honestly (and I know you're not stupid) believe that Tim !@#$ing Tebow was the reason that the Broncos won more than one of those games, then you simply can't judge NFL QB talent.
PortlandiaEast Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 (edited) Eagles vs Bills in Super Bowl 51, you heard it here first! Tebow with the game winning 2pt conversion after he botches the hold on purpose. Edited March 16, 2015 by PortlandiaEast
Gugny Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 Look I think Tebow sucks more than anyone on planet Earth. That being said, I live in Denver and out of his 14 starts, he had a few good ones. I remember him playing pretty well in a game at Minnesota. Again, his TD-INT ratio is better than Manuel's. I think EJ Manuel has played better than Tebow in his career- albeit not by much- but if you are allowed to say Tebow sucks after 14 starts (which I would agree with), why am I not allowed to say, "hey my gut is that it's not happening for EJ Manuel." Cause that's really all I have maintained throughout this whole thing. I thought you were comparing them and saying they had each proven the same amount of sucktitude. I'm sorry if I misunderstood.
FireChan Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 7 game winning drives; 6 of which were 4th quarter. Four of which were games in which he completed less that 50% of his passes. So what, though? If you honestly (and I know you're not stupid) believe that Tim !@#$ing Tebow was the reason that the Broncos won more than one of those games, then you simply can't judge NFL QB talent. Wins and losses man. They don't give out the Lombardi to the team with the most QB talent. They give it out to the team who wins enough games to win the Super Bowl. Do Ravens fans care about QB talent or are they happy with their Dilfer and Flacco wins? And Flacco is good, but he ain't Rodgers in terms of talent.
1billsfan Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 OK sarcasm off: nor is the verdict in on Tebow. Similarly however, I would be very skeptical of Tebow's chances of becoming a franchise QB. Truthfully, I think he has less of a chance than Manuel (even though Tebow's W-L record is better AND his TD-INT ratio is better, but that's neither here nor there). My point is that despite them each only having started 14 games as a pro, I reserve the right to formulate an opinion as to what I perceive to be their odds of becoming a franchise QB. I think those odds are slim for both of them. Do you think it's fair to assess Tebow's odds of becoming a franchise QB? If so, how and why is this a different scenario than Manuel? I think Tebow is a viable NFL QB although in a backup/relief pitcher/special package roll. Maybe he improved his passing skills since he's been out though, so that could change my opinion. The thing with Tebow has been a lot of teams no longer wanted to deal with the Tebowmania craziness. IMO he'd still be in the league as a QB specialist if he didn't have that huge gorilla on his back. I think it's fair to assess Tebow on a shorter 14 game span only because he failed so badly at being able to throw the ball accurately. He was worse than Blain Gabbert in that respect, buuuuut the guy was clutch in the fourth quarter in many ways that "franchise" QBs like Smith and Tannnehill are not. Tebow is one weird cat.
Gugny Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 Wins and losses man. They don't give out the Lombardi to the team with the most QB talent. They give it out to the team who wins enough games to win the Super Bowl. Do Ravens fans care about QB talent or are they happy with their Dilfer and Flacco wins? And Flacco is good, but he ain't Rodgers in terms of talent. Exactly. I'm opining that Tebow sucks and that, even though the Broncos were able to come back a handful of times, it was NOT because of anything Tebow did. I believe that anyone who thinks Tim Tebow adds anything positive to an NFL team that would like to win games would have to be a moron.
Recommended Posts