Jump to content

The dangers of our new normal...


Recommended Posts

 

Once again you demonstrate your innate ability to misconstrue one's point.

 

My point is these are not defenses at all. Defenses are supposed to protect us. The tragic events in Paris once again demonstrated that even with these pervasive and unconstitutional measures to "defend us", they were unable to prevent an attack.

Hey, we had airplanes at Pearl Harbor, yet the Japanese bombed the place anyway. Get rid of airplanes! You are a an idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, we had airplanes at Pearl Harbor, yet the Japanese bombed the place anyway. Get rid of airplanes! You are a an idiot

 

The idiot is the one comparing war planes to mass domestic surveillance as if they're the same thing. For analogies to be effective, they can't be !@#$ing retarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How brain damaged do you have to be to even think that is any sort of rebuttal?

You think his point was valid? If you do then I understand why you can't get the rebuttal. Its cool when you defend him, because he gets you stuck defending some pretty stupid stuff, chuckle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think his point was valid? If you do then I understand why you can't get the rebuttal. Its cool when you defend him, because he gets you stuck defending some pretty stupid stuff, chuckle.

 

Did I say I think his point was valid? No. I said nothing about his point. I said you're brain-damaged. Only your addled little brain compares wire taps to airplanes.

 

You know what would have been a less retarded analogy? HYPO and CAST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think his point was valid? If you do then I understand why you can't get the rebuttal. Its cool when you defend him, because he gets you stuck defending some pretty stupid stuff, chuckle.

 

Again, it helps if you can actually read what's written before you respond. Tom said nothing about my point, only that yours was !@#$ing retarded.

 

Which, it was/is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Again, it helps if you can actually read what's written before you respond. Tom said nothing about my point, only that yours was !@#$ing retarded.

 

Which, it was/is.

 

But we had battleships at Pearl Harbor, and the Japanese Combined Fleet didn't attack Hawaii! So there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Horrible violation of civil liberties!

 

Investigators zeroed in on the building after picking up phone conversations indicating that a relative of Abaaoud might be there. They met fierce resistance from the start, including an armored door, a woman who blew herself up and bullets flying back and forth for about an hour. The French officers even used powerful munitions, which led to one floor of the building collapsing.

 


 

How could I have missed that! :lol:

Very simple, you are an idiot. There, answered your question


 

It's time we banded together to tell you that you're a retard.

You clowns have to ban together to take me on. A little creep like you would get his face pushed into the poop trying to challenge me alone.


 

Did I say I think his point was valid? No. I said nothing about his point. I said you're brain-damaged. Only your addled little brain compares wire taps to airplanes.

 

You know what would have been a less retarded analogy? HYPO and CAST.

Great, we agree, his point was totally idiotic. Tell him so! Oh that's right, you can't. You might lose your little internet support group if you did. What a wimp!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Horrible violation of civil liberties!

 

Very simple, you are an idiot. There, answered your question

You clowns have to ban together to take me on. A little creep like you would get his face pushed into the poop trying to challenge me alone.

Great, we agree, his point was totally idiotic. Tell him so! Oh that's right, you can't. You might lose your little internet support group if you did. What a wimp!

:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Always so angry and so quick to call names. You might need to see a psychologist or therapist or exorcist. Not sure which yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to insult you, but your diagnosis is worthless because the only thing you are qualified to be is Tom's lap dog

 

This wasn't trying to insult me?

 

 

Very simple, you are an idiot. There, answered your question

 

 

At least we know you cannot even manage to be honest about your own motivations. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

You clowns have to ban together to take me on. A little creep like you would get his face pushed into the poop trying to challenge me alone.

 

You have to go all the way back to post #3 to pull that quote? :lol:

 

By the way - what is it with your poop fixation? Perhaps your affinity comes from the fact that it spills out both ends of your body?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha, you making fun of someone's else's brain? You are dumb as a Deranged Rhino, which is pretty low

Do you ever wonder why you are derided by virtually everyone here? It's because you are the epitome of a dumbass. You make attempts to insult people who invariably are much, much smarter than you. Your contributions here are worse than negligible. I'd venture to say that your wit is about as sharp as a two by four and your usefulness could be compared to an already used piece of toilet paper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...