Jump to content

Will the Bills ever sign Charles Clay?

YoloinOhio

By YoloinOhio
in The Stadium Wall Archives

 Share

Will the Bills ever sign Charles Clay?  

294 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the Bills ever sign Charles Clay?

    • Yes
      122
    • No
      100
    • They will actually sign Clay Charles and he's a baller
      45
    • Perhaps. I need to ask Pat Moran.
      27

  2. 2. When will they sign him?

    • 5 days from today
      42
    • 5 days from tomorrow
      61
    • When he is a FA again in 2019
      40
    • NEVER. Big Sammy will start at TE and we will like it.
      76
    • 5 days from "soon"
      75

Recommended Posts

BuffaloBillsForever Veteran

BuffaloBillsForever

Posted
Posted

Incredible. 28 pages and counting of anticipation for maybe signing a still unproven RFA TE.

 

No other fan base is this invested.

I will find it egregious if the FO pays him 8-9 million.

 

IMO it will be a move they will regret.

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

nucci Hall of Famer

nucci

Posted
Posted

He's a good player. He brings a skill set and athletic ability at the TE position that we have been sorely lacking for years. Is he worth all of this attention/money? Probably not, but TEs are hard to find so you have to overpay.

so, he's not unproven? I've discussed money and salary in other threads. it is irrelevant to me how much money a player gets paid. The teams have to spend a minimum of $125M. That's a lot of money for 50 players considering some rookies and 2nd year players make league minmum salary.

Miyagi-Do Karate Hall of Famer

Miyagi-Do Karate

Posted
Posted

I will find it egregious if the FO pays him 8-9 million.

 

IMO it will be a move they will regret.

I won't mind so long as they structure it in a way that they can get out early without a huge cap hit.

 

My sense is that Clay is very valuable to us based on scheme. I would hate to change the scheme and then be stuck with a high-priced guy who doesn't fit.

Justice Veteran

Justice

Posted
Posted

so, he's not unproven? I've discussed money and salary in other threads. it is irrelevant to me how much money a player gets paid. The teams have to spend a minimum of $125M. That's a lot of money for 50 players considering some rookies and 2nd year players make league minmum salary.

He's proven. I don't mind paying him $8M per because I believe he's the one last missing piece to an offense that is potentially dangerous.

Punch Veteran

Punch

Posted
Posted

I won't mind so long as they structure it in a way that they can get out early without a huge cap hit.

 

My sense is that Clay is very valuable to us based on scheme. I would hate to change the scheme and then be stuck with a high-priced guy who doesn't fit.

I don't think Clay is limited in the sense that he cannot fit multiple schemes, but yes, I do think Roman covets him for how well he fits his particular scheme.

BUFFALOTONE Veteran

BUFFALOTONE

Posted
Posted

@PatMoranMix96: Tim Graham on Sports Extra-- "I can tell you this. Down in Miami they are considering Charles Clay a Buffalo Bill."

 

Well, FWIW- driving in this morning they had Omar Kelly on and he backtracked. Apparently the Fins are still positioning to keep Clay as they are 20 mil under the cap. BUT they do have a massive need at OG and LBer. Couple that with the fact that there may be a huge deal down the line for Tannehill.

 

They want that 2 TE set similar the Gronk/Hernandez days.

Dorkington All Pro

Dorkington

Posted
Posted

Unproven???? In 2014 hes#89 on NFL Top 100 as voted on by the players. He is good dude.

Didn't you know... if a player is on the Bills, or the Bills are interested in them, the player sucks. Duh.

 

Well, FWIW- driving in this morning they had Omar Kelly on and he backtracked. Apparently the Fins are still positioning to keep Clay as they are 20 mil under the cap. BUT they do have a massive need at OG and LBer. Couple that with the fact that there may be a huge deal down the line for Tannehill.

 

They want that 2 TE set similar the Gronk/Hernandez days.

Figures :lol:

nucci Hall of Famer

nucci

Posted
Posted

He's proven. I don't mind paying him $8M per because I believe he's the one last missing piece to an offense that is potentially dangerous.

ok, I interpreted your posted incorrectly. Sorry

YoloinOhio Hall of Famer

YoloinOhio

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

He's a good player. He brings a skill set and athletic ability at the TE position that we have been sorely lacking for years. Is he worth all of this attention/money? Probably not, but TEs are hard to find so you have to overpay.

he is money inside the 20. I will pay him out of my own pocket if needed. It's something this team has needed for decades plural. Edited by YoloinOhio
Justice Veteran

Justice

Posted
Posted

ok, I interpreted your posted incorrectly. Sorry

No need to be sorry. I could've worded my post better.

 

Well, FWIW- driving in this morning they had Omar Kelly on and he backtracked. Apparently the Fins are still positioning to keep Clay as they are 20 mil under the cap. BUT they do have a massive need at OG and LBer. Couple that with the fact that there may be a huge deal down the line for Tannehill.

 

They want that 2 TE set similar the Gronk/Hernandez days.

It would be incredibly stupid for the Dolphins to match our offer for Clay. As I said before, yes they have $12M in cap space (outside of Clay's tender) but they have needs everywhere. Whatever they spend now takes away from next year's cap when they need to re-sign Pouncey, Vernon and Tannehill, who some are speculating will get a $100M deal.

 

They also exhausted all of their resources as far as clearing out salary cap space. Not many fruits left on that tree.

Wayne Cubed All Pro

Wayne Cubed

Posted
Posted

Incredible. 28 pages and counting of anticipation for maybe signing a still unproven RFA TE.

 

No other fan base is this invested.

 

Ha, this shows how little you know.

 

Unproven huh? Charles Clay's 2013 season, if he were a Bill, would have been the best season by a TE in Bills history. And it would've been by at least 100 yards. He finished 10th in the NFL, in yards, behind Julius Thomas who had 29 more yards than him and had Peyton Manning throwing him the ball. His 6 TD's were tied for 5th in the NFL for TE's. And in 2014 even though he was injured for part of the season, he had a better season than Scott Chandler who played in all 16 games.

 

But don't let facts get in the way.

Nervous Guy Veteran

Nervous Guy

Posted
Posted

 

Ha, this shows how little you know.

 

Unproven huh? Charles Clay's 2013 season, if he were a Bill, would have been the best season by a TE in Bills history. And it would've been by at least 100 yards. He finished 10th in the NFL, in yards, behind Julius Thomas who had 29 more yards than him and had Peyton Manning throwing him the ball. His 6 TD's were tied for 5th in the NFL for TE's. And in 2014 even though he was injured for part of the season, he had a better season than Scott Chandler who played in all 16 games.

 

But don't let facts get in the way.

Ouch.

negativo RFA

negativo

Posted
Posted

 

Ha, this shows how little you know.

 

Unproven huh? Charles Clay's 2013 season, if he were a Bill, would have been the best season by a TE in Bills history. And it would've been by at least 100 yards. He finished 10th in the NFL, in yards, behind Julius Thomas who had 29 more yards than him and had Peyton Manning throwing him the ball. His 6 TD's were tied for 5th in the NFL for TE's. And in 2014 even though he was injured for part of the season, he had a better season than Scott Chandler who played in all 16 games.

 

But don't let facts get in the way.

 

Since 2011:

Clay: 58 GP, 161 rec, 1,809 yds, 14 TDs

Chandler: 60 GP, 181 rec, 2,112 yds, 17 TDs

 

Have a great day.

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...