Kelly the Dog Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 The issue is I don't think they want to get that high, even if they can. Restructuring Wallace pushes money into next year, they still have tannehill that will require a real hit either this or next (heck, it's hard to push money unless they are tying to him long term and even that's no complaint from me- he's good but not intimidating).... Miami pretty much made their choice on clay once suh was handed a pen. It'd be very surprising if they kept him I hope you're right. I'm pretty sure the Bills know what they are doing. But Miami is going to try to keep him. They're trying to restructure Wallace now. I understand they are pushing money to next year when Suh's hit is huge, and it's risky. I also think they would try to rip up Clay's contract after a year and then pay him a bonus instead of salary which would kill them. And you're right about Tannehill. I hope the Bills just bury them though. We need Clay.
djp14150 Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 I think chandler is released now to make cap room but buffalo could still resign him. I'm unsure what his dead cap space is compared to the cap hit.
Dibs Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I think chandler is released now to make cap room but buffalo could still resign him. I'm unsure what his dead cap space is compared to the cap hit. Cutting Chandler freed up $2.25M in cap room.
The Wiz Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I think chandler is released now to make cap room but buffalo could still resign him. I'm unsure what his dead cap space is compared to the cap hit. dead cap is 600k vs 2.85m
What a Tuel Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Spotrac shows them with 7 million in cap space. With the 7 million they have tied into clay right now, and if they plan to cut Ellerbe, then we need to make year two painful as all hell, not year one. No way we out cap them this year
GG Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Same thing they did with Wallace/ellerbe/etc that year. Year one was silly cheap but two ballooned to a crazy number... Still zero concern here.... To the guy asking if we got played by Miami: Obviously suh would be cheap year 1- they had no choice. Yup, the key is to front load the cap in '15-'16, which would give them zero maneuverability. Ideally they could try to squeeze Clay in, but it would be foolish roster management.
mikemac2001 Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Spotrac shows them with 7 million in cap space. With the 7 million they have tied into clay right now, and if they plan to cut Ellerbe, then we need to make year two painful as all hell, not year one. No way we out cap them this year Is that with rookies?
The Wiz Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Spotrac shows them with 7 million in cap space. With the 7 million they have tied into clay right now, and if they plan to cut Ellerbe, then we need to make year two painful as all hell, not year one. No way we out cap them this year Is that with rookies? no. takes it down to about 2.5m in space.
mikemac2001 Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 no. takes it down to about 2.5m in space. Okay that's what I was thinking
GG Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 no. takes it down to about 2.5m in space. Another side benefit of not having a 1st round draft pick this year
The Wiz Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Okay that's what I was thinking if they cut Elerbe they get about 5m back after dead money.
What a Tuel Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Okay that's what I was thinking Oh yep sorry it has the with rookie total above the without rookie total haha. Still they have options this year. Year 2 would be the hell year for them
Kirby Jackson Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 It sounds like we need to be $10M+ this year to get him. I'm okay with it.
YoloinOhio Posted March 12, 2015 Author Posted March 12, 2015 @BuffRumblings: Suh's unique deal may let Miami match Clay offers http://t.co/uGPvBjh0x7http://t.co/khfOmMTlHH So I wonder what plan b is? Jordan Cameron? Crickets on him. Worrisome.
NoSaint Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Spotrac shows them with 7 million in cap space. With the 7 million they have tied into clay right now, and if they plan to cut Ellerbe, then we need to make year two painful as all hell, not year one. No way we out cap them this year All they'd have to do is turn any year two bonus/salary into signing bonus next year and its a breeze. You kill them this year, or you kill them with total dollars/guarantees. Pushing money out of year two couldn't be simpler for them (and preferred, it seems)
Kelly the Dog Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 All they'd have to do is turn any year two bonus/salary into signing bonus next year and its a breeze. You kill them this year, or you kill them with total dollars/guarantees. Pushing money out of year two couldn't be simpler for them (and preferred, it seems) I know poison pills are no longer allowed but I wonder if a team is able to state in the contract that, say, the first two years cannot be renegotiated in any way by either side.
Andrew Son Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 (edited) Missing on clay would pretty much be a disaster. He was number one target and got the jet treatment... Perfect fit for Roman offense... Edited March 12, 2015 by SWATeam
Rockinon Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Has Buffalo sent an offer sheet yet and if not what is the deadline?
d_wag Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 All they'd have to do is turn any year two bonus/salary into signing bonus next year and its a breeze. You kill them this year, or you kill them with total dollars/guarantees. Pushing money out of year two couldn't be simpler for them (and preferred, it seems) You are assuming he'd say yes to a restructure next year, which is not an automatic. Restructure keeps you around but if he has a good year he'd force their hand and take free agency. This is a tricky situation, bills need to make their offer now, longer they wait the more other free agents get chomped up and they can't afford that if they don't get him.
NoSaint Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I know poison pills are no longer allowed but I wonder if a team is able to state in the contract that, say, the first two years cannot be renegotiated in any way by either side. I doubt it or you'd see those clauses somewhere. The only thing that comes to mind is a signing bonus and structuring it as a two year deal that triggers to an option of years 3 through whatever easily. The bonus would only amortize over two years initially which would hurt them next year but lessen pain this year. Really, I'm still not concerned- if they want to be the tannehill, suh, Wallace and clay show the next few years? Awesome. It would be a shame to miss out on him but not crippling. He's a good player but not unbelievable.
Recommended Posts