YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 Bills should sign him. They need another DT and he's a really good player. @ArmandoSalguero: DT Randy Starks has been cut by the Dolphins this morning.
BuffaloBaumer Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 Replace "sign him" with... fix this hideous line and I agree.
YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2015 Author Posted March 11, 2015 Replace "sign him" with... fix this hideous line and I agree.they can still sign an OL
BuffaloBaumer Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 I just won't feel anything related to a wild card spot until I see one solid oline addition. Then they get another one in the 2nd round
YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2015 Author Posted March 11, 2015 Is this a cost cutting move to sign Clay?I think it's Suh-related, but could be @ChrisTrapasso: #Dolphins save $5M by cutting Randy Starks. Would have represented $6M cap hit in '15. Now represents $1M in dead money this year.
PromoTheRobot Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 I just won't feel anything related to a wild card spot until I see one solid oline addition. Then they get another one in the 2nd roundDid you sleep through the Incognito signing?
YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2015 Author Posted March 11, 2015 He will be a patriot. Share time with biancagood point
boyst Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 good pointbellycheck loves slightly older players with that last few drops of fuel in the tank to Get the most out of. That's also why I think Spiller ends up in NE. He will play the Kevin Faulk role there and be as much a WR and STer as anything.
YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2015 Author Posted March 11, 2015 bellycheck loves slightly older players with that last few drops of fuel in the tank to Get the most out of. That's also why I think Spiller ends up in NE. He will play the Kevin Faulk role there and be as much a WR and STer as anything.they lost vereen and not sure about Ridley but he's a FA. Spiller makes sense. But will bill pay him more than the 4.5/yr bills offered?
boyst Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 they lost vereen and not sure about Ridley but he's a FA. Spiller makes sense. But will bill pay him more than the 4.5/yr bills offered?a chance to put a ring on. Compete against Gailey. The Bills. Its worth a discount if you spin it right. Spiller in the slot instead of amendola has my attention.
FLbills Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 Replace "sign him" with... fix this hideous line and I agree. What's wrong with the Bills D-Line? They just extended KW and are working to keep the majority of the D intact. I am sure they will restructure MD and be able to keep the D-line together for the next three years.
K-9 Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 bellycheck loves slightly older players with that last few drops of fuel in the tank to Get the most out of. That's also why I think Spiller ends up in NE. He will play the Kevin Faulk role there and be as much a WR and STer as anything. Then he better learn to block. And soon. Bellyache doesn't tolerate two things: RBs that fumble and RBs that can't block. Faulk was great at that. GO BILLS!!!
Johnny Hammersticks Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 What's wrong with the Bills D-Line? They just extended KW and are working to keep the majority of the D intact. I am sure they will restructure MD and be able to keep the D-line together for the next three years. I think folks are concerned about the drop off in run defense after MD went down late last season. Would be nice to get another big "space eater" just in case. Charles is not that type of DT.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 Then he better learn to block. And soon. Bellyache doesn't tolerate two things: RBs that fumble and RBs that can't block. Faulk was great at that. GO BILLS!!! That's why Spiller to the *pats doesn't make sense to me. Spiller doesn't block at all.
YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2015 Author Posted March 11, 2015 What's wrong with the Bills D-Line? They just extended KW and are working to keep the majority of the D intact. I am sure they will restructure MD and be able to keep the D-line together for the next three years.rex stated they needed to add a DT. It probably won't be one of this caliber but who knows.
Luxy312 Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 No to Randy Starks. Bills have plenty of depth at DT and one of the best defensive lines in football, if not the best. Would be a pointless signing. They should prioritize Clay and another offensive lineman.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 No to Randy Starks. Bills have plenty of depth at DT and one of the best defensive lines in football, if not the best. Would be a pointless signing. They should prioritize Clay and another offensive lineman. Who's the depth at DT?
Luxy312 Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 (edited) Who's the depth at DT? The two youngsters S.Charles and C.Bryant had 4.5 sacks last year in mostly relief time for Dareus and Williams. Now, we really didn't see what they could do starting full time. I'll give you that, but don't believe that's a reason to go out and pay another DT $5 million+ a year. The only point I would do that would be if Dareus suffers as bad injury. They have Jeremy Towns as well, but I haven't seen him play. Edited March 11, 2015 by Luxy312
Recommended Posts