Jump to content

Letter to Iran


Recommended Posts

Oh? Is that what they’re calling it these days?

 

 

 

On the day that ISIS captured Iraq’s tenth-largest city, President Obama said it was a “tactical setback” for the U.S. war and “I don’t think we’re losing.” Obama was speaking to The Atlantic‘s Jeffrey Goldberg in a wide-ranging interview about the Middle East. (Palmyra, Syria fell to ISIS the next day.) Obama explained that “Ramadi had been vulnerable for a very long time, primarily because these are not Iraqi security forces that we have trained or reinforced.”

 

 

 

 

Want to read Goldberg’s full interview at The Atlantic? Here you go. But we warn you: It won’t restore your faith in Obama’s competence or ability as Leader of the Free World.

Saddam wouldn't have put up with this nonsense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 356
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

So wait. Is the world a better place or not with Saddam gone? :wacko:

 

 

That type of reference is a waste of time C.J................

 

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty Gator said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less."

 

My apologies to Mr. Carroll.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a6-DLN142467-355x200.jpg

.@marieharf to be Senior Advisor for Strategic Committee to Sec. Kerry, will continue leading on Iran negotiations communications strategy

 

If this doesn't push the Iranian negotiator to put a gun in his mouth, nothing will.

 

 

 

Keep James Taylor on standby.........................

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a6-DLN142467-355x200.jpg

.@marieharf to be Senior Advisor for Strategic Committee to Sec. Kerry, will continue leading on Iran negotiations communications strategy

 

If this doesn't push the Iranian negotiator to put a gun in his mouth, nothing will.

 

 

 

Keep James Taylor on standby.........................

.

 

Why would the Iranian negotiator be upset by this? Iran's probably getting their champagne bottles and a copy of We Are the Champions ready for their victory celebration

Link to comment
Share on other sites

harf-perplexed.jpgTotes absurd, bruh.

 

 

Harf: We’re totally “perplexed” why anyone’s worried about a 20% increase in Iranian nuclear material

 

The State Department’s got 99 problems with Iran, but a 20% increase in their nuclear stockpile ain’t among them, according to Marie Harf. Pressed by the media for an answer on a New York Times story about the sharp increase in material during the Obama administration’s negotiations, Harf pronounced herself and her team “perplexed” at the concern. “There are some real issues, serious ones that we have to resolve in these talks,” Harf responded yesterday, “but this just isn’t one of them.”

 

See if this response fills you with confidence (Video at Link)

 

So these are the things we’ve learned from Harf:

  • The State Department considers concern over a 20% increase in Iranium nuclear stockpiles “absurd”
  • The entire team is “totally perplexed” why the New York Times would report on it
  • However, it’s apparently true, even while being “totally inaccurate,” because it’s “absurd” to think the State Department wasn’t already aware of it
  • Harf keeps repeating herself over and over to convince people that it doesn’t matter

 

 

A 20% increase in stockpiles during a negotiation isn’t “manufacturing a concern,” it’s a concern over manufacturing.

 

Iran wants to manufacture nuclear weapons, and an increase in manufacturing the material needed to eventually make it should concern those who claim Iran is a trustworthy partner in negotiating an end to their weapons program.

 

What Harf is doing is manufacturing a case that (a) the Iranians are misunderstood and (b) the State Department is smarter than everyone else, including the IAEA and the actual data.

 

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/06/03/harf-were-totally-perplexed-why-anyones-worried-about-a-20-increase-in-iranian-nuclear-material/

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Chanting ‘Death to America,’ Iran MPs vote to bar military inspectors

Associated Press, by Staff

 

Original Article

 

 

 

Maybe now John Kerry, Obama and Congress will get the message.

 

 

.

 

I posted this in the other thread.

 

They were chanting in Farsi which means it could be misinterpreted. It could mean anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

POTUS continuing to "negotiate" with Iran makes as much sense as driving your wife to her boyfriend's house and waiting outside until they're finished. It appears that Iran's leaders have tumbled to what many of us knew all along: POTUS has no common sense and will pound his head into a wall rather than make a strategic decision and show some backbone.

 

What a maroon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...