KD in CA Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 time to join the Bills and be the Ted Washington replacement we should have drafted. I know people here loved Evans, but that was another horrible first round decision.
K-9 Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 Too bad we are set at DT CBF Quite the contrary; it's awesome that we are set at DT. GO BILLS!!!
Canadian Bills Fan Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 Quite the contrary; it's awesome that we are set at DT. GO BILLS!!! Very true! CBF
billsfan89 Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 I think he goes to Denver on a one year deal. Denver is going to lose their powerhouse run stuffer to the Raiders in all likelihood. With their cap situation not being the best they might want to find a cheaper vet to fill that role. That being said I would love to see Wilfork come here. Imagine a 3-4 D-line look of Kyle Williams-Wilfrok-Dareus with Mario and Hughes (If we are able to keep him) at the OLB. That being said I don't think it will happen but it would be a very Rex Ryan like move.
faderphreak Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 (edited) I'm totally against the Bills bringing him on board. Although playing devil's advocate, siging him would be one way to ensure he wasn't going after the knees of Bills quarterbacks. Then again, he may get confused and do it in practice as a force of habit Edited March 5, 2015 by faderphreak
YoloinOhio Posted March 5, 2015 Author Posted March 5, 2015 I would prefer he go somewhere outside the division
dezertbill Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 (edited) Kyle Williams, Darius, and the rotation of Bryant and Charles (all of whom has shown flashes of talent) is a good foundation for our DL. Mario and Lawson at OLB, a threesome of Bradham, Brown, and David Harris in the middle. I'm sure we'll add pieces via FA or draft, but I don't see us eating large cap space for a 33 year old DT when we have other areas that really need our dire attention (OL, TE). Wilfork won't be cheap Edited March 5, 2015 by dezertbill
truth on hold Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 (edited) Looking at the production that Ted and Phat Pat had in their mid 30's, it's easy to see how Wilfork still has two years left in the tank of clogging up the middle. It's not like speed was ever his calling card. actually it was. he had a great burst off the snap, and kept it going throughout the whole play. he lost the burst and the stamina, also plays too high now, doesn't get leverage ... maybe someone like raiders give him a 1yr deal. no matter, he's out of the league in a year IMO. Id much rather have Alan Branch back if we're talking Pats DTs Edited March 5, 2015 by JTSP
GG Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 actually it was. he had a great burst off the snap, and kept it going throughout the whole play. he lost the burst and the stamina, also plays too high now, doesn't get leverage ... maybe someone like raiders give him a 1yr deal. no matter, he's out of the league in a year IMO. Id much rather have Alan Branch back if we're talking Pats DTs Let's add this to one more thing you have no clue on: "The Patriots have allowed 3.7 yards per rush with Vince Wilfork on the field the past two seasons. With Wilfork off, the Patriots allowed 4.7 yards per rush. -- ESPN Stats & Information"
Hazed and Amuzed Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Wilfork grew up a Bills fan, Whaley seems to like bringing people with some Buffalo ties (whether they grew up a fan like Watkins or they grew up in Buffalo like Corey Graham) on board. I think if he's willing to just be a rotational guy that this is a possibility.
NoSaint Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Let's add this to one more thing you have no clue on: "The Patriots have allowed 3.7 yards per rush with Vince Wilfork on the field the past two seasons. With Wilfork off, the Patriots allowed 4.7 yards per rush. -- ESPN Stats & Information" The list is getting long. Should we just swap to listing what he does know?
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 (edited) I'm betting on him becoming a Bill. 2 years $12 million. Edited March 6, 2015 by TheTruthHurts
truth on hold Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Let's add this to one more thing you have no clue on: "The Patriots have allowed 3.7 yards per rush with Vince Wilfork on the field the past two seasons. With Wilfork off, the Patriots allowed 4.7 yards per rush. -- ESPN Stats & Information" and you really think if he accounted for the difference on his own the Pats wouldnt have kept him? lol ... ok
RealityCheck Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 The addition of Wilfork would make Spikes completely unnecessary in the base defense.. Vince playing the nose would free Dareus up to make even more plays.
CSBill Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 I just hope Suh doesn't end up in the AFCE Unless he's in a Bills uniform, I would like that
machine gun kelly Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Why do Bills fans always want every over the hill player or players to trade that will never get traded? Wilfork was the best in his prime, but he's not in his prime, and we already have the most depth and most talent, not to mention the most money in our defensive line. Here's a thought. We take that $17 mil after signing draft picks and use it for J. Thomas, Lupati or Franklin, and another second tier QB to compete in training camp.
GG Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 The list is getting long. Should we just swap to listing what he does know? Sure. Here's the list: 1.
DallasBillsFan1 Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12495228/vince-wilfork-sign-houston-texans
Kirby Jackson Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 They should sign his wife to round out a formidable front 4.
Recommended Posts