Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's was officially announced on both sides weeks ago... Am I missing an inside joke somewhere? Probably lol

Officially announced by the teams but until it's fully announced it doesn't matter, the Bills are still to trade.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Oh Sweet Jeepers. Does this mean we might have to take Kiko back? Think of the children who already ordered their Shady jerseys! Think of the children!

Edited by Nanker
Posted

whether or not you can play two sports in two different cities for one owner.

Shame that the Sabres can never get a home outdoor game under Pegula's ownership. !@#$ing rules :censored:

Posted

Could the Bills have signed Murray for the same salary as McCoy and kept Kiko ?

Only if Pegs gave up ownership of either The Bills or The Sabres.

Hey, rules is rules.

Posted

Could the Bills have signed Murray for the same salary as McCoy and kept Kiko ?

In know this has already been asked and answered buy it's buried. Basically:

 

A) Yes in theory but...

B) Murray took less money to go to the Eagles, likely because he wanted a winner and to stick it to the Cowboys for lowballing him by going to a division rival. The trade eliminated the risk of having to fight for it.

C) Kiko is good but not a perfect fit in Rex's system. Bradham has developed nicely and the team was still a top 5 defense without him, so Kiko was replacable.

 

I think that covers it.

×
×
  • Create New...