The Poojer Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 My son, an Eagles fan, is telling me this trade was almost Woods for McCoy, they settled on Kiko in the end. He also says that Chip Kelly still has his sights set on Woods which kind of makes the Harvin pickup so relevant.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Think its about time we change the title and remove "to" since the trade has already happened? Â Â Â CBF
NoSaint Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 Think its about time we change the title and remove "to" since the trade has already happened? Â Â Â CBF i bet we will manage alright either way
Uncle Monkeyhead Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 My son, an Eagles fan, is telling me this trade was almost Woods for McCoy, they settled on Kiko in the end. He also says that Chip Kelly still has his sights set on Woods which kind of makes the Harvin pickup so relevant. This here says they actually wanted Woods And Kiko for McCoy. Looks like Whaley said NFW Â http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2015/3/26/8294247/nfl-trade-rumors-eagles-robert-woods-lesean-mccoy-kiko-alonso-bills
YoloinOhio Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 This here says they actually wanted Woods And Kiko for McCoy. Looks like Whaley said NFW Â http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2015/3/26/8294247/nfl-trade-rumors-eagles-robert-woods-lesean-mccoy-kiko-alonso-bills lol nice try, Chip.
NoSaint Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) This here says they actually wanted Woods And Kiko for McCoy. Looks like Whaley said NFW  http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2015/3/26/8294247/nfl-trade-rumors-eagles-robert-woods-lesean-mccoy-kiko-alonso-bills I guess "we will take either" and the bills saying "ok take this one" amounts to "NFW"??? Maybe I'm reading that too much like you think it's now clear he's untouchable Edited March 27, 2015 by NoSaint
Nanker Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Wait. We traded Kiko?!!! When the !@#$ did this happen?
YoloinOhio Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 I guess "we will take either" and the bills saying "ok take this one" amounts to "NFW"??? Â Maybe I'm reading that too much like you think it's now clear he's untouchable i thought they said the eagles asked for both players at first
Kelly the Dog Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 i thought they said the eagles asked for both players at first That report seemed preposterous to me. I imagine it came from some interview where Chip Kelly or some Eagles official told a reporter something like, "We talked to them about Woods and Alonzo" and they were implying either or, and the reporter thought that meant for both. It just seems laughable that they would ask seriously for both of them. Whaley would have laughed and said, then we want McCoy and Mathis.
NoSaint Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 That report seemed preposterous to me. I imagine it came from some interview where Chip Kelly or some Eagles official told a reporter something like, "We talked to them about Woods and Alonzo" and they were implying either or, and the reporter thought that meant for both. It just seems laughable that they would ask seriously for both of them. Whaley would have laughed and said, then we want McCoy and Mathis. yea that would be a pretty quick come down to go from two young potential stars to cutting it in half within 30 minutes. i guess its possible they said "what the heck, lets try something crazy" but i dont think it was serious even if it actually happened. i tend to agree with how you read it.
What a Tuel Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) My son, an Eagles fan, is telling me this trade was almost Woods for McCoy, they settled on Kiko in the end. He also says that Chip Kelly still has his sights set on Woods which kind of makes the Harvin pickup so relevant.  Even with Harvin, I am not so sure I would want the Eagles to still be pursuing Woods. I'm not sure what they could give us to make it worth it, but I like our WR's the way they are now. Also Whaley is talking about picking up another veteran WR for depth, so I don't think he is high on letting any of the WRs go either.  https://twitter.com/viccarucci/status/581481039907987457?lang=en  On the other hand, maybe that means he is going to deal Woods. Who knows. Edited March 27, 2015 by What a Tuel
Beerball Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Think its about time we change the title and remove "to" since the trade has already happened? Â Â Â CBF Not until there is an official presser.
Nanker Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 So there's still a chance that we can keep Kiko - even though we've signed Shady to a new deal? Â So, you're saying we have a chance?
boyst Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 i wonder if the lack of an announcement of something 100% official is because there is something going on that Alonso must be fully cleared?
YoloinOhio Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) It was officially announced on first day of FA I thought @buffalobills: #NFLFreeAgency Day 1: What. A. Day. Day 2: Let's GO! Â Relive McCoy's Bills introduction: http://t.co/0OPh14ZSBDhttp://t.co/zbFVVsBkCI Edited March 29, 2015 by YoloinOhio
Punch Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 i wonder if the lack of an announcement of something 100% official is because there is something going on that Alonso must be fully cleared? Huh?
boyst Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 Huh? like maybe cuz phili's endo f the deal means kiko is fuly reocovered.
NoSaint Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 like maybe cuz phili's endo f the deal means kiko is fuly reocovered. Neither team would allow that to hang.... What would philly do? Roll with McCoy and Murray?
YoloinOhio Posted March 29, 2015 Posted March 29, 2015 It's was officially announced on both sides weeks ago... Am I missing an inside joke somewhere? Probably lol
Recommended Posts