Keukasmallies Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Wasn't there some guy in Europe a number of years back who espoused the concept of the big lie? It appears the Clinton's have raised the concept to an art form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 ‘Clinton Cash’ author demolishes Hillary’s self-defense By Peter Schweizer Grave incompetence or brazen dishonesty? Those are the only two conclusions one can reasonably come to after reviewing Hillary Clinton’s stunning Sunday interview on local New Hampshire TV. When WMUR local TV host Josh McElveen asked Clinton why her State Department greenlit the transfer of 20 percent of all US uranium to the Russian government, Clinton claimed she had no involvement in her own State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium One to Russia. “I was not personally involved because that wasn’t something the secretary of state did,” said Clinton. The transfer of 20 percent of US uranium — the stuff used to build nuclear weapons — to Vladimir Putin did not rise to the level of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s time and attention? Beyond being an admission of extreme executive negligence on an issue of utmost national security, Hillary’s statement strains credulity to the breaking point for at least three other reasons. First, nine investors who profited from the uranium deal collectively donated $145 million to Hillary’s family foundation, including Clinton Foundation mega-donor and Canadian mining billionaire Frank Giustra, who pledged $100 million. Since 2005, Giustra and Bill Clinton have frequently globetrotted together, and there’s even a Clinton Foundation initiative named the Clinton-Giustra initiative. But Hillary expects Americans to believe she had no knowledge that a man who made a nine-figure donation to her foundation was deeply involved in the deal? Nor eight other mining executives, all of whom also donated to her foundation? Second, during her Sunday interview, Clinton was asked about the Kremlin-backed bank that paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a single speech delivered in Moscow. Hillary’s response? She dodged the question completely and instead offered this blurry evasion. “The timing doesn’t work,” said Clinton. “It happened in terms of the support for the foundation before I was secretary of state.” more at the link: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 1, 2015 Share Posted July 1, 2015 A.B. Stoddard: ‘Hillary Clinton’s Entire Strategy Was to Circumvent the FOIA’ by Debra Heine Original Article While you sleep, dozens of reporters claw through Hillary's new email and find, yet again, Sidney Blumenthal. Blumenthal´s State Dept. role went far beyond Libya Washington Examiner (DC), by Sarah Westwood Original Article And these are just the e-mails she is LETTING US see. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts