/dev/null Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 This one scandal may well be the end of my relationship with my SO. Should be fun! So now you're a Racist© and Sexist© like the rest of us who didn't drink the Kool-Aid
keepthefaith Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Whoever on the Repub side gets on stage with her in the debates should have a lot of material to work with, that is if she will even participate. Given that she's Hillary, she may not feel it is necessary.
IDBillzFan Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Whoever on the Repub side gets on stage with her in the debates should have a lot of material to work with, that is if she will even participate. Given that she's Hillary, she may not feel it is necessary. Part of me thinks she'll stay in this no matter what. Remember, she's two people removed from Anthony Weiner, who spent three days lying on national television about his gig with Sydney Leathers before realizing that people thought he might be lying. It takes a ridiculous narcissist to think that way, and HIllary Clinton makes Anthony Weiner look like he's in touch with the average American. But every day something new comes out and you realize that what Ron Fournier wrote is embarrassingly true: Hillary's a landline in an iPhone world. She'll probably stay in until it's too late.
Doc Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 Whoever on the Repub side gets on stage with her in the debates should have a lot of material to work with, that is if she will even participate. Given that she's Hillary, she may not feel it is necessary. So she'll be skipping the Combine and only working out at her Pro Day?
/dev/null Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 So she'll be skipping the Combine and only working out at her Pro Day? Neither. She's trying to work out her contract for the #1 Overall Pick
B-Man Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 Razor @hale_razor Follow Is Hillary's illegal home-brew email secure from terrorists? ...........................Depends what the meaning of ISIS. 9:31 AM - 4 Mar 2015 303 Retweets 217 favorites OK, that was just beautiful. Can anything top it? Well, this email prediction from that same Twitter user might just do it. Ready to see one of Hillary’s emails? Take a gander: Razor @hale_razor Follow "What ██████ does it ████?" #HillaryEmails 10:23 AM - 11 Mar 2015 88 Retweets 60 favorites
3rdnlng Posted March 13, 2015 Posted March 13, 2015 OK, that was just beautiful. Can anything top it? Well, this email prediction from that same Twitter user might just do it. Ready to see one of Hillary’s emails? Take a gander:
B-Man Posted March 14, 2015 Posted March 14, 2015 State Dept: Most official email not auto-archived until Feb.Associated Press, by Staff Original Article Hillary Clinton’s Excuses For Her Use of a Personal Email Account While At State Are Falling Apart. Rule of thumb: If the coverup is this embarrassing, what’s being covered up must be much worse. .
meazza Posted March 14, 2015 Posted March 14, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aV7KGUCDSj4#t=301 :lol:
Deranged Rhino Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aV7KGUCDSj4#t=301 :lol: That's pretty !@#$ing hilarious.
meazza Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 That's pretty !@#$ing hilarious. Yeah. Was a tough crowd. I saw bill burr live and he's one of the best.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 Yeah. Was a tough crowd. I saw bill burr live and he's one of the best. He handled it perfectly. His reaction was priceless.
/dev/null Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obama-adviser-behind-leak-of-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal/ Does this mean that Obama was lying when he said that he first heard about this thru the news. Or does this mean that he's not the one running his administration? Is this all a result of bad blood between Team Clinton and Team Obama, or is Team Obama trying to sink Hilary because they doubt her ability to keep the White House for the Democrats?
Doc Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obama-adviser-behind-leak-of-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal/ Does this mean that Obama was lying when he said that he first heard about this thru the news. Or does this mean that he's not the one running his administration? Is this all a result of bad blood between Team Clinton and Team Obama, or is Team Obama trying to sink Hilary because they doubt her ability to keep the White House for the Democrats? The problem is, they have no one else. They probably did it just to sink her, period.
B-Man Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 ‘How Hard Can It Be?’ State Dept Still Can’t Find Hillary’s Crucial ‘Separation’ Form AP reporter Matt Lee was stumped by the State Department’s inability to find the “separation” form Hillary Clinton should’ve signed when she quit as Secretary of State, wondering why the department cannot go back and pull the document from the department’s HR files. The form, OF-109, is critical to understanding whether Clinton violated the law by maintaining her own private e-mail account and server to conduct official business as Secretary. If she signed the form, as is required for all departing employees, she may have committed a felony. The document asserts, under penalty of perjury, that the employee turned over all relevant records at the time of signing. And if she didn’t sign the form, the question remains: Why not? But reporters, who started asking for the form last week, have been repeatedly stymied by the State Department. “I don’t have an update on this, Matt,” spokeswoman Jenn Psaki told Lee on Monday. “We’re still working on it.” “The human resources department presumably has a file on every employee,” Lee pressed. “It can’t be that difficult.” “I don’t think former secretaries are standard employees,” Psaki said. “Well, they might not be,” Lee said. “But how hard can it be to find . . . Where do these forms, once they’re signed, go? They don’t go into the ether, like so many other e-mails seem to have.” “We do keep records, yes,” Psaki said. “It should be on file.”Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/415470/how-hard-can-it-be-state-dept-still-cant-find-hillarys-crucial-separation-form-brendan
DC Tom Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 ‘How Hard Can It Be?’ State Dept Still Can’t Find Hillary’s Crucial ‘Separation’ Form AP reporter Matt Lee was stumped by the State Department’s inability to find the “separation” form Hillary Clinton should’ve signed when she quit as Secretary of State, wondering why the department cannot go back and pull the document from the department’s HR files. The form, OF-109, is critical to understanding whether Clinton violated the law by maintaining her own private e-mail account and server to conduct official business as Secretary. If she signed the form, as is required for all departing employees, she may have committed a felony. The document asserts, under penalty of perjury, that the employee turned over all relevant records at the time of signing. And if she didn’t sign the form, the question remains: Why not? But reporters, who started asking for the form last week, have been repeatedly stymied by the State Department. “I don’t have an update on this, Matt,” spokeswoman Jenn Psaki told Lee on Monday. “We’re still working on it.” “The human resources department presumably has a file on every employee,” Lee pressed. “It can’t be that difficult.” “I don’t think former secretaries are standard employees,” Psaki said. “Well, they might not be,” Lee said. “But how hard can it be to find . . . Where do these forms, once they’re signed, go? They don’t go into the ether, like so many other e-mails seem to have.” “We do keep records, yes,” Psaki said. “It should be on file.” Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/415470/how-hard-can-it-be-state-dept-still-cant-find-hillarys-crucial-separation-form-brendan Cabinet secretaries aren't government employees. They probably can't find it because Clinton didn't have to fill it out.
IDBillzFan Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 Cabinet secretaries aren't government employees. They probably can't find it because Clinton didn't have to fill it out. Do we not fund the salary and activities of the cabinet secretary with taxpayer dollars?
DC Tom Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 Do we not fund the salary and activities of the cabinet secretary with taxpayer dollars? Yes. So? Cabinet secretaries aren't "hired," they're appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. They're neither SES nor GS. They're no more employees of their departments than the Speaker of the House is an employee of Congress.
Recommended Posts