Beerball Posted March 3, 2015 Posted March 3, 2015 Here, here! Somebody with some sense. All the posters on here clamoring for Sanchez to be our QB remind me of the defenders of the oil refinery in The Road Warrior when they considered The Humungus' offer of "Give us the gasoline, and I spare your lives. Just walk away." to be believable & reasonable. Mark Sanchez is a washed-out, turnover machine. Keep him away from my Bills. Just sayin'. Reading comprehension is hard. Nobody is clamoring.
UticaBill Posted March 3, 2015 Posted March 3, 2015 I honestly don't even think Sanchez or Mallett are in the equation.... I'd rank it like this depending on if the Bills prefer stability or potential most important. FA Vets Campbell (33yrs) - 16,771yds, 81.7 Rating, 60.3%, 1.45:1 td/int, 6.7 avg Moore (30yrs) - 5342yds, 79.2 rating, 58.9%, 1.18:1 td/int, 7.0 avg Locker (26yrs) - 4967yds, 79.0 rating, 57.5%, 1.23:1 td/int, 7.0 avg McCoy (28yrs) - 5458yds, 78.2 rating, 60.3%, 1.09:1 td/int, 6.6 avg Hoyer (29yrs) - 4557yds, 76.8 rating, 56.5%, 1:1 td/int, 7.2 avg Ponder (27yrs) - 6658yds, 75.9 rating, 59.8%, 1.06:1 td/int, 6.3 avg It is also possible we trade for a QB under contract Glennon (25yrs) - 4025yds, 83.7 rating, 58.8%, 193:1 td/int, 6.5 avg FAs considered not viable for Bills Sanchez (28yrs) - 14,510yds, 74.1 rating, 56.3%, 1.03:1 td/int, 6.7 avg Mallett (26yrs) - 417yds, 61.0 rating, 53.2%, 0.67:1 td/int, 5.3 avg Gabbert (25yrs) - 4395yds, 66.8 rating, 53.2%, 0.96:1 td/int, 5.6 avg Claussen (27yrs) - 1781yds, 60.2 rating, 52.7%, 1:2 td/int, 5.1 avg
BringBackFergy Posted March 3, 2015 Posted March 3, 2015 I honestly don't even think Sanchez or Mallett are in the equation.... I'd rank it like this depending on if the Bills prefer stability or potential most important. FA Vets Orton (age unimportant) Yards: Multiple Avg: 100% on all passes caught between 2-25 yds TD/INT ratio: Unimportant It Factor: Yes Campbell (33yrs) - 16,771yds, 81.7 Rating, 60.3%, 1.45:1 td/int, 6.7 avg Moore (30yrs) - 5342yds, 79.2 rating, 58.9%, 1.18:1 td/int, 7.0 avg Locker (26yrs) - 4967yds, 79.0 rating, 57.5%, 1.23:1 td/int, 7.0 avg McCoy (28yrs) - 5458yds, 78.2 rating, 60.3%, 1.09:1 td/int, 6.6 avg Hoyer (29yrs) - 4557yds, 76.8 rating, 56.5%, 1:1 td/int, 7.2 avg Ponder (27yrs) - 6658yds, 75.9 rating, 59.8%, 1.06:1 td/int, 6.3 avg It is also possible we trade for a QB under contract Glennon (25yrs) - 4025yds, 83.7 rating, 58.8%, 193:1 td/int, 6.5 avg FAs considered not viable for Bills Sanchez (28yrs) - 14,510yds, 74.1 rating, 56.3%, 1.03:1 td/int, 6.7 avg Mallett (26yrs) - 417yds, 61.0 rating, 53.2%, 0.67:1 td/int, 5.3 avg Gabbert (25yrs) - 4395yds, 66.8 rating, 53.2%, 0.96:1 td/int, 5.6 avg Claussen (27yrs) - 1781yds, 60.2 rating, 52.7%, 1:2 td/int, 5.1 avg
Vinaccia Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 So after obtaining Cassel does Sanchez still come in?
truth on hold Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 So after obtaining Cassel does Sanchez still come in? my best guess no. i think theyre shying away because rex doesn't want to bring the baggage. i think tuel gets released and they draft a project late for the 3rd QB
devldog131 Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 Why do we even need a FA QB? Just draft one and build the rest of the team. If you're going& #, then EJ will be just fine. Rake & hashtag? EJ planning on starting a twitter based gardening blog? Yes... I know what you meant...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 5, 2015 Posted March 5, 2015 Peace Frog, on 03 Mar 2015 - 12:08 AM, said: Why do we even need a FA QB? Just draft one and build the rest of the team. If you're going& #, then EJ will be just fine. for those not familiar with the symbols - Ground and Pound ! well done THIS is even more true with the signing of Shady (no not Sanchez)
Recommended Posts