BobbyC81 Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 If this is true I have to assume that the deal on day 1 of FA is a trade that has already been worked out and not a move for a FA QB. And if that is the case then maybe it's not such a bad thing. Either way this offseason is set to be the most exciting one I can remember in a while and I'm ready to see it all play out however it does. A trade for Roman's boy Kaepernick?
YoloinOhio Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 (edited) A trade for Roman's boy Kaepernick? I haven't seen anything to make me think he's his boy or would want to coach him again. He seemed to think he was pretty limited. Edited February 27, 2015 by YoloinOhio
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 A trade for Roman's boy Kaepernick? I'm thinking more Rg3. Not hoping, but thinking
rayray808 Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 only logical reason to cut EJ would be to sell to Bradford that there is no QB controversy, and that this is his team. Sign McCown as the back up, with him knowing damn well he needs to be ready at an ACL tears notice. this team doesn't follow logic... therefore, EJ will not be cut
Chuck Wagon Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 I think the biggest hang up is the "1st round pick" title. I absolutely believe there were very few (if any) other teams that graded EJ out as a 1st round pick. He played at a major college program that ran a pro style system for several years, this wasn't a Joe Flacco instance where he was playing against inferior competition and people struggled to accurately judge him. The book was out on EJ regarding his struggles with accuracy and his methodical (nice way of saying slow) approach. I think our braintrust fell in love with him in interviews and talked themselves into needing to take a QB prospect early. They moved down from 8 because they knew he'd still be on the board but weren't willing to risk it any further. EVERYONE in the business jumped all over us the second the pick was made and while EJ has looked competent at times, they've largely been right. You can't drastically change a guys accuracy. While EJ has shown flashes the necessary consistency hasn't been there. You can miss a deep pass, but you absolutely have to nail your short throws. He's routinely missed guys or placed the ball in bad spots on the short throws. One would believe Rex and Roman have spent many hours studying him and have talked to many people they trust regarding him. If they make the decision to release him, it's because they don't see it. Until they burn us, they at least deserve a bit of the benefit of the doubt if they decide he doesn't have it. If he didn't have the "1st round pick" label there would be nowhere near the same amount of people who believe he needs more chances and from every outside perspective he's a 1st round pick in name only. I haven't seen anything to make me think he's his boy or would want to coach him again. He seemed to think he was pretty limited. Kaep is Harbaughs boy.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 You know what would be hilarious? Bills release a statement saying they have agreed to a contract extension with EJ Manuel CBF
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 only logical reason to cut EJ would be to sell to Bradford that there is no QB controversy, and that this is his team. Sign McCown as the back up, with him knowing damn well he needs to be ready at an ACL tears notice. this team doesn't follow logic... therefore, EJ will not be cut Bradford, if we got him, would only come via trade.Meaning he'd have no say in the situation, so there's nothing to sell.
NoSaint Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 Bradford, if we got him, would only come via trade.Meaning he'd have no say in the situation, so there's nothing to sell. Except no ones trading for him without a contract in place so he has an incredible amount of say (imo)
1billsfan Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 only logical reason to cut EJ would be to sell to Bradford that there is no QB controversy, and that this is his team. Sign McCown as the back up, with him knowing damn well he needs to be ready at an ACL tears notice. this team doesn't follow logic... therefore, EJ will not be cut Does Bradford need a blanket and a hot chocolate to go along with that? The wuss should thank his lucky stars he got the last golden ticket on the rookie big bucks QB train.
Mike in Horseheads Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 You know what would be hilarious? Bills release a statement saying they have agreed to a contract extension with EJ Manuel CBF LOL... Happened with Darcy Regier and the Sabres.... then they canned him a year or two latter.
BillsBytheBay Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 I can't see any reason to cut EJ. None. Show me two better options on our team. We're chasing a guy with no upside and dont see any QB's with upside on there way to the Bills. I haven't been an EJ fan but I think he is our only true prospect at QB.
Formerly Allan in MD Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 Trade EJ and a low round pick to Cleveland for Johnnie. A one for a one. Trade EJ and a low round pick to Cleveland for Johnnie. A one for a one. Baggage for baggage.
The Big Cat Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 FWIW, Leroi's been saying this for a month.
eball Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 FWIW, Leroi's been saying this for a month. Which would mean so much more if we had any idea who Leroi is, or from where he gets his information.
Mike in Horseheads Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 Trade EJ and a low round pick to Cleveland for Johnnie. A one for a one. Baggage for baggage. Baggage for baggage? Thats crazy and Cleveland would jump on that trade. More like baggage cart for potential.
GG Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 Which would mean so much more if we had any idea who Leroi is, or from where he gets his information. Then he wouldn't be sharing the information. Pick your poison
Fixxxer Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 Am I the only one that read "IMO" at the end of Leroi's post?
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 Am I the only one that read "IMO" at the end of Leroi's post? LMO but it's all lowercase.
Dorkington Posted February 27, 2015 Posted February 27, 2015 LMO but it's all lowercase. No, it's "IMO", see for yourself, copy and paste his text into a google search, or into a word document, or whatever, that's what I did.
Recommended Posts