Buffalo_Stampede Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Top ten in both fumbles and interceptions in every full season he has played... No thanks tiny hands.
Max997 Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 I know that Mark has his issues, but check out these post season stats, 2009 60.3%comp 539 yards 7.93 AVG 4 TD's 2 INT's 2010 60.7%comp 616 yards 6.92 AVG 5 TD's 1 INT's I think he would be the right fit for competition for QB. Stats from 4 years ago are irrelevent
Formerly Allan in MD Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 No, he proved last year he isn't dependable to win big games and is a turnover machine He certainly was dependable to win big games at USC. Watch the tape of his last bowl game there. Granted, it doesn't necessarily translate to the NFL. But of the crop out there, he's likely your best bet.
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 He certainly was dependable to win big games at USC. Watch the tape of his last bowl game there. Granted, it doesn't necessarily translate to the NFL. But of the crop out there, he's likely your best bet. EJ went 4-0 in bowl games. You're right, college has nothing to do with the pros. See most of the Heisman trophy winners.
What a Tuel Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 (edited) The case for Mark Sanchez is the rest of the free agent market.This is short and well stated. He isn't good, and is only the best of poor qbs. Even that is debatable. Edited February 20, 2015 by What a Tuel
Philly McButterpants Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Always been my #1 choice of the available candidates because a) he's proven he can win in a ground and pound, defense oriented program, and b) he won't cost an arm and a leg Unlike Bradford . ..
RyanC883 Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 The case for Mark Sanchez is the rest of the free agent market. Bingo. If we get a FA QB, he is by far the best available that can make this team a playoff caliber team. Bradford is not currently available, if he were, I would want him. EJ went 4-0 in bowl games. You're right, college has nothing to do with the pros. See most of the Heisman trophy winners. EJ hasn't played in any "big games" in the NFL.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Bingo. If we get a FA QB, he is by far the best available that can make this team a playoff caliber team. Bradford is not currently available, if he were, I would want him. EJ hasn't played in any "big games" in the NFL. Are we still talking about the QB who took over a 6-2 Eagles team and went 4-4 to miss the playoffs this year, right? The one who had 15 TD's (including 1 rushing) and 14 turnovers in those 8 games?
Deranged Rhino Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Are we still talking about the QB who took over a 6-2 Eagles team and went 4-4 to miss the playoffs this year, right? The one who had 15 TD's (including 1 rushing) and 14 turnovers in those 8 games? Logic and level headed thinking will get you nowhere on this board.
K-Apps Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 He certainly was dependable to win big games at USC. Watch the tape of his last bowl game there. Granted, it doesn't necessarily translate to the NFL. But of the crop out there, he's likely your best bet. And how long was that, in big games against Seattle, Home vs Dallas, and at Washington, he couldn't raise his game and the Eagles missed the playoffs. Sanchez is not a QB I want if the Bills need a solid performance in a big game from a QB.
Beef Jerky Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 If you are going to want Sanchez then you might as well just start the season with EJ as starter.
truth on hold Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 If you are going to want Sanchez then you might as well just start the season with EJ as starter.I want them both, competing
John from Riverside Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 I found it interesting that most of the nfl pundits didnt think Rex would take Sanchez a second time..... You could be looking at a Hoyer or Locker situation
Nanker Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 I've got something for anybody with a case for Sanchize: http://youtu.be/okaPcnnUTsQ
The Wiz Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 It's one play. So was EJ's pick 6 to Watt and his INT when his receiver was mauled but people still want him off the team. One play is enough for most people to hold on to. That being said, I still don't want him, butt fumble.
PromoTheRobot Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 So was EJ's pick 6 to Watt and his INT when his receiver was mauled but people still want him off the team. One play is enough for most people to hold on to. That being said, I still don't want him, butt fumble.The thing with EJ, for me, was the way he threw passes that would get his receivers killed. But I'm willing to consider the possibility that he was haunted by Marrone telling him no turnovers ever. He played like her was afraid to take a dump without checking the toilet paper three times first. A QB, like any athlete, can't be thinking in the pocket. He has to "feel the force" and be in the zone.
Dr. Fong Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 He certainly was dependable to win big games at USC. Watch the tape of his last bowl game there. Granted, it doesn't necessarily translate to the NFL. But of the crop out there, he's likely your best bet. I heard he was pretty clutch in high school too.
Beef Jerky Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 He certainly was dependable to win big games at USC. Watch the tape of his last bowl game there. Granted, it doesn't necessarily translate to the NFL. But of the crop out there, he's likely your best bet. Don't look at college tape of a guy who has been in the league for a while now... I want them both, competing So you want EJ to start?
Recommended Posts