Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 When I think of a dynasty team, I think of a team that goes into a SB and dominates. The Pats have barely squeaked out all 3 of their SB wins. Yes they are a great team, but not the dominate dynasty everyone is making them out to be. They obvioulsy are a well oiled machine who knows how to win 3/4 SBs but in no way are they an overpowering team IMO. The Cowboys whooping us twice, now they were overpowering.
gantrules Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 Yeah, BUT, even Troy Aikman said that he's more impressed with what the Pats have done.
Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Posted February 7, 2005 Yeah, BUT, even Troy Aikman said that he's more impressed with what the Pats have done. 230428[/snapback] Troy Aikman is the biggest idiot on TV, well except for Collingsworth. They are the most pitiful commentators I have listened to in quite awhile.
gantrules Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 Troy Aikman is the biggest idiot on TV, well except for Collingsworth. They are the most pitiful commentators I have listened to in quite awhile. 230432[/snapback] I enjoy Aikman and Buck. I can't stand Collinsworth. The guy is worse than Theeesssman.
Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Posted February 7, 2005 I enjoy Aikman and Buck. I can't stand Collinsworth. The guy is worse than Theeesssman. 230436[/snapback] I just hate listening to Aikman start every qoute with, "when I played" kind of reminds me of Joe T.
Hollywood Donahoe Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 When I think of a dynasty team, I think of a team that goes into a SB and dominates. When I think of a dynasty team, I think of a team that goes into multiple Super Bowls in a limited time span and wins them all. But hey, that's just me.
Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Posted February 7, 2005 When I think of a dynasty team, I think of a team that goes into multiple Super Bowls in a limited time span and wins them all. But hey, that's just me. 230447[/snapback] 3 SB wins by a total of 9 points, give me a break. No dynasty.
Ozymandius Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 They are a dynasty. It's definitional. 3 championships = a dynasty.
Ozymandius Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 btw, i don't think they give a sh-- whether anyone believes they have a dynasty... they'll just comfort themselves by hugging their 3 trophies if we don't
gmac17 Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 When I think of a dynasty team, I think of a team that goes into multiple Super Bowls in a limited time span and wins them all. But hey, that's just me. if the bills ever win a super bowl I sure as hell won't be on a pats message board talking about it an hour later...but hey, that's just me.
JLO Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 at least the Bruins arent going anywhere this year
Pete Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 I am still waiting for that clickable vomit smiley
Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Posted February 7, 2005 They are a dynasty. It's definitional. 3 championships = a dynasty. 230468[/snapback] Is that in the dictionary somewhere??? I must have missed it. It's a dynasty by CBS, ESPNs and FOXs standards maybe.
Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Posted February 7, 2005 at least the Bruins arent going anywhere this year 230485[/snapback] Just wait a minute, hockey season has not started yet!!! They are STILL talking!!!
JLO Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 Just wait a minute, hockey season has not started yet!!! They are STILL talking!!! 230492[/snapback] exactly
Ozymandius Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 Is that in the dictionary somewhere??? I must have missed it. It's a dynasty by CBS, ESPNs and FOXs standards maybe. 230489[/snapback] 99% of the world agree they're a dynasty now... but you're welcome to think different, of course... honestly, no hard feelings
BuffOrange Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 if the bills ever win a super bowl I sure as hell won't be on a pats message board talking about it an hour later...but hey, that's just me. 230474[/snapback] Haha - even if I felt tempted to do that, I would avoid doing it to at least pretend like I have a life.
Tux of Borg Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 99% of the world agree they're a dynasty now... but you're welcome to think different, of course... honestly, no hard feelings 230495[/snapback] It's difficult to say... when i think of a dynasty, i think of a great team that overpowers everyone else. New England really doesn't blow out people. (although they did spank indy and pitt) Also, they aren't loaded with future hall of fame players. A very average team that always finds a way to win.
Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Posted February 7, 2005 99% of the world agree they're a dynasty now... but you're welcome to think different, of course... honestly, no hard feelings 230495[/snapback] Check your post, you used the word definitional.....not me. Some friendly advice, think before you say something stupid. 99% of the population does not make something definitional (and I bet more like 75% - 80% would call the Pats a dynasty).
Rayzer32 Posted February 7, 2005 Author Posted February 7, 2005 99% of the world agree they're a dynasty now... but you're welcome to think different, of course... honestly, no hard feelings 230495[/snapback] Sorry, I mesread your post. Did you actually already poll the world to come up with the 99% of the world ALREADY thinks the Pats are a dynasty. That is some good work for one person. Hey moron, we here at TBD have more common sense than some of your Pats board members.
Recommended Posts