Dragonborn10 Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Mario is elite and probably a LB in the base defense. Lawson won't be on the roster. We are screwed if Kiko is the MLB.
Beef Jerky Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Mario is elite and probably a LB in the base defense.Lawson won't be on the roster.We are screwed if Kiko is the MLB. Yea Preston Brown should be MLB.
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 How is Rambo not "Unknown?" He's had like three games, and picked of Rodgers, TWICE! Mario is elite, and Kyle is between Elite and Very Good, other than that, quite accurate.
FireChan Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 How is Rambo not "Unknown?" He's had like three games, and picked of Rodgers, TWICE! Mario is elite, and Kyle is between Elite and Very Good, other than that, quite accurate. Because he stunk in Washington.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 How is Rambo not "Unknown?" He's had like three games, and picked of Rodgers, TWICE! Mario is elite, and Kyle is between Elite and Very Good, other than that, quite accurate. He was terrible in Washington before that, but who isn't?
2003Contenders Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 I wouldn't say that Henderson was poor either. I thought he was average -- below average at worst.
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Do the bold names mean anything?
YoloinOhio Posted February 19, 2015 Author Posted February 19, 2015 (edited) Do the bold names mean anything?I'm guessing they mean that they will be FAs in 2016? But then Nigel would be bold and I thought Lawson was on a 4 yr deal signed in 2013. So maybe not.Edit - maybe it means they are listed as the starter currently but they did not actually start there last year, as the starter isn't pictured due to not being under contract That would make sense since CJ, pears, and Hughes can't be listed Edited February 19, 2015 by YoloinOhio
NoSaint Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 I'm guessing they mean that they will be FAs in 2016? But then Nigel would be bold and I thought Lawson was on a 4 yr deal signed in 2013. So maybe not. Edit - maybe it means they are listed as the starter currently but they did not actually start there last year, as the starter isn't pictured due to not being under contract That would make sense since CJ, pears, and Hughes can't be listed article said it was age. i believe 30+
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 article said it was age. i believe 30+ That'd make sense. Because There's no reason Kyle would be bold.
YoloinOhio Posted February 19, 2015 Author Posted February 19, 2015 That'd make sense. Because There's no reason Kyle would be bold.Oh I see - I missed that Kyle was bold since his name was in white
Uffalo Ills Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 No love for Baccari Rambo? Either he should be an "unknown" or a very good for his one start
QB Bills Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Baccari Rambo should be elite based on his name alone. I was actually disappointed he only got two picks against Rodgers. I was expecting at least 4.
RyanC883 Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 interesting rankings, don't agree with the starting WR rankings. But we do have issues at QB, RB, TE, OL and WR (depth).
Captain Hindsight Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 How is Garrison Sanborn AVERAGE???? This is a travesty. My thoughts exactly
GunnerBill Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 No love for Baccari Rambo? Either he should be an "unknown" or a very good for his one start I presumed they were including his poor performances for Washington in the ranking. Being bad in that defense is not fatal though... the Washington D has been awful for years.
dave mcbride Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Anyone that does not classify Mario Williams as elite has no credibility. I guess that JJ Watt is the ONLY DE that they consider elite? There is not another DE in football as good as Mario. He was voted a 1st team All-Pro this year and rightfully so. PFF always grades mario out lower than one would expect. To be fair to them, they do based on a play by play analysis of every play. I'm not sure it's the right way, but there's a logic to the approach.
Kirby Jackson Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 PFF always grades mario out lower than one would expect. To be fair to them, they do based on a play by play analysis of every play. I'm not sure it's the right way, but there's a logic to the approach. I hear you but it just loses weight. Hyperbole aside he may be the BEST at his position in the NFL. He isn't a "very good" player like a Jerry Hughes or a Kyle Williams. Some would consider him one of the 10 best players in the NFL. If they only had 5 guys in the NFL listed as elite I would be okay with it.
Recommended Posts