Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'm expecting at least one game considering the drug incident as well. But I believe it's all wrapped up in personal conduct and you never know what Roger will do there.

Yep, he'll most likely get at least 1 game, maybe 2.

Posted

I'm betting no suspension. He complied with the law for his drug arrest (for a drug that isn't banned by the NFL) and this will be a traffic ticket.

Posted

prob 1 game, unless he ends up on the Patriots, in which case he will not get banned. :w00t:

also a likely scenario that the one game ban happens to coincide with when we play the Pats.
Posted

I'm betting no suspension. He complied with the law for his drug arrest (for a drug that isn't banned by the NFL) and this will be a traffic ticket.

Wasn't aware traffic tickets carried up to a year in jail penalty - better watch my speed :w00t:

Posted

I am think its fun y how this is going to trial. It may plead out at the last moment me thinks to something next to nothing. Like it should be.

Posted

I am think its fun y how this is going to trial. It may plead out at the last moment me thinks to something next to nothing. Like it should be.

Losing control of your car during a drag race on a busy major road at 3 in the afternoon is not nothing.

Posted

Losing control of your car during a drag race on a busy major road at 3 in the afternoon is not nothing.

 

oh, trust me I agree. But this is not a huge deal becausnothing happened. As bad as that sounds.
Posted (edited)

What I find interesting is that Dareus' attorney turned down a reckless driving plea offered up by the DA. Wonder what their angle is? Could there be some difficulty on the state side with proof of drag racing?

Edited by eball
Posted

What I find interesting is that Dareus' attorney turned down a reckless driving plea offered up by the DA. Wonder what their angle is? Could there be some difficulty on the state side with proof of drag racing?

 

 

§ 1212. Reckless driving. Reckless driving shall mean driving or using any motor vehicle, motorcycle or any other vehicle propelled by any power other than muscular power or any appliance or accessory thereof in a manner which unreasonably interferes with the free and proper use of the public highway, or unreasonably endangers users of the public highway. Reckless driving is prohibited. Every person violating this provision shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
His attorney apparently wasn't willing to concede a criminal record without going to court. However IMO this case will be straightforward to prove in court. They have plenty of unbiased witnesses to the event. Being convicted of a crime will almost certainly result in a suspension, which is why the attorney isn't willing to concede that. The cost to take this to trial is probably substantially less than one of Marcell's game checks.
Posted

His attorney apparently wasn't willing to concede a criminal record without going to court. However IMO this case will be straightforward to prove in court. They have plenty of unbiased witnesses to the event. Being convicted of a crime will almost certainly result in a suspension, which is why the attorney isn't willing to concede that. The cost to take this to trial is probably substantially less than one of Marcell's game checks.

 

Don, any plea necessarily involves conviction of a "crime" -- but even reckless driving is a traffic misdemeanor that is pretty inconsequential. I'm finding it hard to believe they'd turn down that plea unless they actually think they can win at trial.

×
×
  • Create New...