BillsFan-4-Ever Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Boner invites Netanyahu to congress (w/o Presidential knowledge?) http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/01/21/boehner-invites-israeli-prime-minister-netanyahu-to-address-congress and it backfires Israeli official suggests Boehner misled Netanyahu on Congress speech talk about narcissistic bonehead moves Enjoy
Chef Jim Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Talk about boneheads. The Dems and the WH were all up in arms about not being informed on Netanyahu being invited however are cheering the Pope being invited without their pre-approval. Why do Democrats hate Jews?
Nanker Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Gee, the WH didn't get it's dick in a snit when Boehner invited the Pope to address Congress.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Talk about boneheads. The Dems and the WH were all up in arms about not being informed on Netanyahu being invited however are cheering the Pope being invited without their pre-approval. Why do Democrats hate Jews? What?? Can't you post ANYTHING without being wildly pro-Republican party?
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted February 6, 2015 Author Posted February 6, 2015 Gee, the WH didn't get it's dick in a snit when Boehner invited the Pope to address Congress. does the Pope have Nukes?
Chef Jim Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 What?? Can't you post ANYTHING without being wildly pro-Republican party? So you take a bash on the Dems as me being pro-Republican?? Great deduction Sherlock. And hearing that coming from you is !@#$ing hilarious. does the Pope have Nukes? I think it's best to talk to someone with nukes don't you?
Chef Jim Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 No, your point? I think it has something to do with bears shitting in the woods.
B-Man Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 (edited) Co - Equal Branches of Government...........Congress is under NO obligation to clear any speakers with the Executive branch. . . Edited February 6, 2015 by B-Man
LeviF Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 (edited) Honestly, if I were a head of state, I'd want to know about invites extended to other consequential* heads of state. *added to distinguish Benny from the Pope, who is technically a head of state. Edited February 6, 2015 by LeviF91
Nanker Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 So the Pope is inconsequential? Well, yes, he did order the Crusades and implemented Jim Crow in the Vatican, I'll grant you. But wouldn't that make him even more relevant?
GG Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 Don't come all surprised at the Congressional blowback to an imperial presidency.
LeviF Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 So the Pope is inconsequential? When we're comparing Vatican City and Israel? Relatively speaking, yeah.
IDBillzFan Posted February 6, 2015 Posted February 6, 2015 It's funny to me that the president takes his pen and takes his phone and makes some of the most far-reaching executive orders to ever come out of the WH, but the the co-equal branch of the government invites an ally Obama detests to talk about the people and country he also detests is a problem? It's sad how thin-skinned progressives have become.
Dante Posted February 7, 2015 Posted February 7, 2015 It's funny to me that the president takes his pen and takes his phone and makes some of the most far-reaching executive orders to ever come out of the WH, but the the co-equal branch of the government invites an ally Obama detests to talk about the people and country he also detests is a problem? It's sad how thin-skinned progressives have become. Also I think Barry is just jealous and threatened by a real man like Netanyahu. But who can blame him with that tranny looking, kid lunch pushing slob he has to sleep with. Damn that's bad and I haven't even had a 9.8% beer yet.
IDBillzFan Posted February 7, 2015 Posted February 7, 2015 Also I think Barry is just jealous and threatened by a real man like Netanyahu. But who can blame him with that tranny looking, kid lunch pushing slob he has to sleep with. Damn that's bad and I haven't even had a 9.8% beer yet. I'm not big on picking on Michelle's looks, but I will agree that one of the reasons Obama looks so completely lost on everything foreign policy is that the vacuum for leadership is being filled by men who WANT to lead. And that just helps Obama look more and more like your typical progressive nutsucker using embarrassing phrases like "strategic patience."
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 7, 2015 Posted February 7, 2015 Also I think Barry is just jealous and threatened by a real man like Netanyahu. But who can blame him with that tranny looking, kid lunch pushing slob he has to sleep with. Damn that's bad and I haven't even had a 9.8% beer yet.What the !@#$ is wrong with you? You're absolutely classless.
DC Tom Posted February 7, 2015 Posted February 7, 2015 Also I think Barry is just jealous and threatened by a real man like Netanyahu. But who can blame him with that tranny looking, kid lunch pushing slob he has to sleep with. Damn that's bad and I haven't even had a 9.8% beer yet. So would McCain's foreign policy have been better or worse given that he beats his wife?
/dev/null Posted February 7, 2015 Posted February 7, 2015 Executive amnesty for illegal immigrants. Telling Congress not to screw up his negotiations with Iran. Major policy change in regards to Cuba. The whole pen and a phone thing And Congress is the narcissistic one?
Chef Jim Posted February 7, 2015 Posted February 7, 2015 What the !@#$ is wrong with you? You're absolutely classless. Yup. You can bag on someone's politics all you want but for Christ's sakes what does how they look like have to do with it. And the whole nutrition this she's been working on is actually a good thing. The PSA's she's pounding on through social media are wait......Damn Nacy did a better job getting her anti-drug message out nearly 30 years ago without the social media hashtag cranial.
Recommended Posts