Nanker Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Hate the sin, love the sinner I always say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Hate the sin, love the sinner I always say. Except for slutty redheads. Then I'm all for loving the sin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 You make an excellent point there Sir Thomas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 So you can't be a "true" Christian if you hate or crusade against another group of people? Perhaps we should rename the "no true Scottsman" logical fallacy. I assure you, there are many Christians who don't hate a group of people. The fallacy does not apply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 So you can't be a "true" Christian if you hate or crusade against another group of people? Perhaps we should rename the "no true Scottsman" logical fallacy. It's not a "no true Scottsman" fallacy. I'll leave you to figure out why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Don't you hate and often speak out against "Progressives"? Hating progressives and speaking out against them are two different things. I don't hate anyone, and even if I did, at question is '"Did I hate because of weakness, and recognize my wrong?" or "Do I seek to hate with no regret, convinced its no big deal because, y'know, as sins go, it's not that big of a deal?" The problem you're having is that you genuinely don't, won't or can't see the difference between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Don't you hate and often speak out against "Progressives"? I can only speak for myself, but would guess that more than a few other conservatives feel like I do. I don't hate Progressives as individuals but I despise their thought process and beliefs. As conservatives we are reality based. In other words we don't subscribe to rainbow farting unicorns as the answer to what ails us. We believe in self reliance, hard work, smaller government blah, blah, blah. You believe in, well, nothing that you have articulated. I guess ridiculing believers is sort of a religion but not something I'd want on my headstone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 Obama seems to have pissed off the Conservative Christian Bumpkins by implying one God isn't bigger and badder than the other God. The response by this Red State retard seems to prove his point: "Barack Obama is not, in any meaningful way, a Christian and I am not sure he needs to continue the charade. With no more elections for him, he might as well come out as the atheist/agnostic that he is.1 He took his first step in doing so yesterday in a speech reeking with contempt for faith in general and Christianity in particular. Saying that violent acts are not representative of Islam, the President then attacked Christians for the Crusades (started as a response to Islamic invasion), the Inquisition (a Catholic thing, not us Protestants), slavery (abolished thanks to Christians), and Jim Crow (Dr. King also had a "Reverend" in front of his name)." http://www.redstate.com/2015/02/06/barack-obama-is-not-a-christian-in-any-meaningful-way/ So the Catholics are not really Christians? And I guess he forgot in one sence that the Crusaders were Catholic, too. Slavery was defended to the death and destruction by Prods, too and that King was fighting other Prods to end Jim Crow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 Obama seems to have pissed off the Conservative Christian Bumpkins by implying one God isn't bigger and badder than the other God. The response by this Red State retard seems to prove his point: "Barack Obama is not, in any meaningful way, a Christian and I am not sure he needs to continue the charade. With no more elections for him, he might as well come out as the atheist/agnostic that he is.1 He took his first step in doing so yesterday in a speech reeking with contempt for faith in general and Christianity in particular. Saying that violent acts are not representative of Islam, the President then attacked Christians for the Crusades (started as a response to Islamic invasion), the Inquisition (a Catholic thing, not us Protestants), slavery (abolished thanks to Christians), and Jim Crow (Dr. King also had a "Reverend" in front of his name)." http://www.redstate.com/2015/02/06/barack-obama-is-not-a-christian-in-any-meaningful-way/ So the Catholics are not really Christians? And I guess he forgot in one sence that the Crusaders were Catholic, too. Slavery was defended to the death and destruction by Prods, too and that King was fighting other Prods to end Jim Crow. O ye of little knowledge. How can you argue that Barack Obama is a Christian? That's like arguing you're an economist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 O ye of little knowledge. How can you argue that Barack Obama is a Christian? That's like arguing you're an economist. Or that you are not a douche bag! Are you a Chriatian LA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 Obama seems to have pissed off the Conservative Christian Bumpkins by implying one God isn't bigger and badder than the other God. The response by this Red State retard seems to prove his point: "Barack Obama is not, in any meaningful way, a Christian and I am not sure he needs to continue the charade. With no more elections for him, he might as well come out as the atheist/agnostic that he is.1 He took his first step in doing so yesterday in a speech reeking with contempt for faith in general and Christianity in particular. Saying that violent acts are not representative of Islam, the President then attacked Christians for the Crusades (started as a response to Islamic invasion), the Inquisition (a Catholic thing, not us Protestants), slavery (abolished thanks to Christians), and Jim Crow (Dr. King also had a "Reverend" in front of his name)." http://www.redstate.com/2015/02/06/barack-obama-is-not-a-christian-in-any-meaningful-way/ So the Catholics are not really Christians? And I guess he forgot in one sence that the Crusaders were Catholic, too. Slavery was defended to the death and destruction by Prods, too and that King was fighting other Prods to end Jim Crow. It looks like the article is trying to say that Obama isn't a Christian. That's the first line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 Or that you are not a douche bag! Are you a Chriatian LA? If you're trying to ask me if I'm a Christian, the answer is yes. I'm not sure why that is relevant to the conversation. It looks like the article is trying to say that Obama isn't a Christian. That's the first line. It really is all Erickson's saying. The reality is that what Obama is good at is irking people he dislikes, and so he knows that having a meeting with Muslim leaders he refuses to name, and then immediately trying to justify the burning death of the Jordanian pilot but providing a centuries old out-of-context reference to Christians and Crusades (complete with the condescending "on our high horses" comment) is meant to do one thing; rile people up so he lackeys can call them racists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 (edited) If you're trying to ask me if I'm a Christian, the answer is yes. I'm not sure why that is relevant to the conversation. It really is all Erickson's saying. The reality is that what Obama is good at is irking people he dislikes, and so he knows that having a meeting with Muslim leaders he refuses to name, and then immediately trying to justify the burning death of the Jordanian pilot but providing a centuries old out-of-context reference to Christians and Crusades (complete with the condescending "on our high horses" comment) is meant to do one thing; rile people up so he lackeys can call them racists. He's very talented at polarizing. Edited February 8, 2015 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 It really is all Erickson's saying. The reality is that what Obama is good at is irking people he dislikes, and so he knows that having a meeting with Muslim leaders he refuses to name, and then immediately trying to justify the burning death of the Jordanian pilot but providing a centuries old out-of-context reference to Christians and Crusades (complete with the condescending "on our high horses" comment) is meant to do one thing; rile people up so he lackeys can call them racists. It's the community organizer in him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 Or that you are not a douche bag! Are you a Chriatian LA? Few are, I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 9, 2015 Share Posted February 9, 2015 If you're trying to ask me if I'm a Christian, the answer is yes. I'm not sure why that is relevant to the conversation. racists. You are?? Isn't there anything in that bible of your that says you have to be reasonably amicable Or something? You are a complete sh. It head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2015 Share Posted February 9, 2015 You are?? Isn't there anything in that bible of your that says you have to be reasonably amicable Or something? You are a complete sh. It head. Proverbs 12:1 "Whoso loveth instruction loveth knowledge: but he that hateth reproof is an idiot." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 9, 2015 Share Posted February 9, 2015 Proverbs 12:1 "Whoso loveth instruction loveth knowledge: but he that hateth reproof is an idiot." I thought that was the book of Tom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 9, 2015 Share Posted February 9, 2015 I thought that was the book of Tom? No, that's actually in the Bible. My translation, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 9, 2015 Share Posted February 9, 2015 You are?? Isn't there anything in that bible of your that says you have to be reasonably amicable Or something? You are a complete sh. It head. You're such a predictable progressive...feeling entitled to something from someone else based on nothing more than a fleeting assumption. Perhaps you should spend some time studying the BIble before you start claiming what you expect from Christians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts