TC in St. Louis Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Do we get any? We seem never to get any of these!! Doesn't anybody sign our guys?
ddaryl Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 We lost Byrd but Signed Spikes Byrd will net us a pick. How much Spikes offsets that pick is the question. Whom else did we lose last season worth mentioning ?
Beef Jerky Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Nope probably not... http://overthecap.com/projecting-the-compensatory-draft-picks-for-2015/
4merper4mer Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Nope probably not... http://overthecap.com/projecting-the-compensatory-draft-picks-for-2015/ So Dane Fletcher nets a pick to the Pats and Jairus Byrd nets nothing? Dane Fletcher sounds like a breed and a dog name like Beagle Snoopy or something. WTF? How many picks do the Pats get for people bothering them about cheating?
PromoTheRobot Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) Roger Goodell will dock the Pats* a 7th round pick for Deflate-gate. But then give em a bunch of 3rd round comp picks because. Edited February 3, 2015 by PromoTheRobot
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 So basically the signing of Chris Johnson and Brandon Spikes guarantees that we won't get anything for losing Jairus Byrd, whose $9 million per year would have been the 3rd best company pick, a 3rd rounder, the 35th pick in round 3. Despite losing Moats, Carrington, and Leonard. Oh good.
NoSaint Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 We lost Byrd but Signed Spikes Byrd will net us a pick. How much Spikes offsets that pick is the question. Whom else did we lose last season worth mentioning ? incorrect. we signed spikes, rivers, williams, dixon.... i think someone else? it was more guys than we lost that were qualified signings elsewhere. the offset you are discussing isnt how it works. since we signed more we are ineligible. if we sign and lose equal we can only get a 7 after all the teams that had losses. you have to lose more than signed (just number of qualified transactions) in order to get anything noteworthy. byrd gets us nothing.
Jamie Nails Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 So basically the signing of Chris Johnson and Brandon Spikes guarantees that we won't get anything for losing Jairus Byrd, whose $9 million per year would have been the 3rd best company pick, a 3rd rounder, the 35th pick in round 3. Despite losing Moats, Carrington, and Leonard. Oh good. *Chris Williams
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 incorrect. we signed spikes, rivers, williams, dixon.... i think someone else? it was more guys than we lost that were qualified signings elsewhere. the offset you are discussing isnt how it works. since we signed more we are ineligible. if we sign and lose equal we can only get a 7 after all the teams that had losses. you have to lose more than signed (just number of qualified transactions) in order to get anything noteworthy. byrd gets us nothing. Orton?
NoSaint Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) Orton? i think he was too late. its a window from free agency opening through June 1(?). when we signed legursky it was JUST after that window closed, presumably to keep him out of the equation as an example. Edited February 3, 2015 by NoSaint
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 i think he was too late. its a window from free agency opening through June 1(?). when we signed legursky it was JUST after that window closed, presumably to keep him out of the equation as an example. Ah, I wasn't sure of the window
NoSaint Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Ah, I wasn't sure of the window really, im not positive the exact date either. I think it used to be when camps started, but was bumped up in the last CBA. I know i remember the legursky situation specifically and that was right at the start of June. Orton was definitely late though.
Pete Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=buffalo-bills&id=9616&src=desktop We aren't receiving any comp picks. We also signed Corey Graham and Wynn
BringBackFergy Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 I think we can all agree that Doug Marrone was a hot commodity and is well respected around the league. That being said, and given his departure, I think we should be given two compensatory picks: 1) for the loss of Marrone, and 2) another because he will transform the Jags O-line into a wrecking machine (on our dollar). Thoughts?
Cash Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 I think we can all agree that Doug Marrone was a hot commodity and is well respected around the league. That being said, and given his departure, I think we should be given two compensatory picks: 1) for the loss of Marrone, and 2) another because he will transform the Jags O-line into a wrecking machine (on our dollar). Thoughts? Good call. Per Adam Schefter, he's also going to be a hot commodity next year, which should be factored in as well. I think maybe a 2nd this year and a 2nd in 2016 would be fair. I know the comp picks usually don't start till the 3rd round, but I think an exception is warranted in this case.
BringBackFergy Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Good call. Per Adam Schefter, he's also going to be a hot commodity next year, which should be factored in as well. I think maybe a 2nd this year and a 2nd in 2016 would be fair. I know the comp picks usually don't start till the 3rd round, but I think an exception is warranted in this case. A third seems fair this year...but I'll bet the Jags were in touch with Marrone before he left (that boils my blood)...we should get their second round pick next year after the NFL investigates their tampering.
Best Player Available Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 A third seems fair this year...but I'll bet the Jags were in touch with Marrone before he left (that boils my blood)...we should get their second round pick next year after the NFL investigates their tampering.Let it go. What if he forces the jags to give him back................
John from Riverside Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 it would not shock me to see them retain Chris Williams and add another OG Lets keep in mind.....when Chris Williams was in the lineup the OL actually looked much better.
Recommended Posts