truth on hold Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 (edited) Great secondary but this was always the risk given how hard they hit, and how much theyre asked to do in that scheme:Sherman - ulnar nerve damage, will need Tommy John surgeryLane - compound fracture, both wrists brokenChancellor - may require surgery on knee injured in practiceThomas - getting 2nd opinion, expectation will need surgery http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000467799/article/sherman-to-have-surgery-thomas-getting-2nd-opinion Edited February 2, 2015 by JTSP
Doc Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 Lane was injured by a Pats player on that INT return and was a huge loss for them.
EmotionallyUnstable Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 So what's your point? Every player is at risk. Especially those objected to a 19 game season.
truth on hold Posted February 2, 2015 Author Posted February 2, 2015 (edited) Lane was injured by a Pats player on that INT return and was a huge loss for them. i think it was edelman. i was yelling at the TV for Lane to just go down, nothing good was going to come of running around down there after the INT when there was no where to go. sure enough ... So what's your point? Every player is at risk. Especially those objected to a 19 game season. point was in the OP ... read it. can you name another super bowl team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery after the game? Edited February 2, 2015 by JTSP
EmotionallyUnstable Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 i think it was edelman. i was yelling at the TV for Lane to just go down, nothing good was going to come of running around down there after the INT when there was no where to go. sure enough ... point was in the OP ... read it. can you name another super bowl team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery after the game? Three of those injuries were pre-existing. Idt their physical nature has anything to do with the number of injuries. People get injured in all schemes.
truth on hold Posted February 2, 2015 Author Posted February 2, 2015 (edited) Three of those injuries were pre-existing. Idt their physical nature has anything to do with the number of injuries. People get injured in all schemes. didnt say some of them werent pre-existing .... and question remains: can you name another super bowl team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery after the game? Or for that matter, any team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery at end of season? Edited February 2, 2015 by JTSP
BringBackFergy Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 So what's your point? Every player is at risk. Especially those objected to a 19 game season. Who objected to the 19 game season? The players' union?? Or am I on the wrong subject?
Mark80 Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) Lane was injured by a Pats player on that INT return and was a huge loss for them. No Doc, Edelman had nothing to do with it. He just fell on it wrong. http://i.imgur.com/oiJZNNq.jpg Edited February 3, 2015 by Mark80
truth on hold Posted February 3, 2015 Author Posted February 3, 2015 How did Edelman do this exactly? He just fell on it wrong. http://i.imgur.com/oiJZNNq.jpg holy %@$# that is nasty
Mark80 Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Best part is, they only said he was "doubtful" to come back!
Mr. WEO Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 didnt say some of them werent pre-existing .... and question remains: can you name another super bowl team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery after the game? Or for that matter, any team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery at end of season? Your OP says 2 of them may need surgery. One isn't sure and is seeking a second opinion.
truth on hold Posted February 3, 2015 Author Posted February 3, 2015 Your OP says 2 of them may need surgery. One isn't sure and is seeking a second opinion. we'll know soon enough if it's 3 or 4 (2 are certain, another almost certain). How about name another team where 2 members of the secondary were certain to require surgery (sherman, lane), one was highly likely (thomas), and one was possible (chancellor) at the end of the season?
Mr. WEO Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 we'll know soon enough if it's 3 or 4 (2 are certain, another almost certain). How about name another team where 2 members of the secondary were certain to require surgery (sherman, lane), one was highly likely (thomas), and one was possible (chancellor) at the end of the season? I know you're hammering hard at this point that NE beat a decimated Seahawks defense. But didn't these guys all start?
truth on hold Posted February 3, 2015 Author Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) I know you're hammering hard at this point that NE beat a decimated Seahawks defense. But didn't these guys all start? sherman, thomas, cam all played with injuries -- sherman (surgery), thomas (surgery most likely), cam (possible) lane was KO'd of the game early after picking brady kind of a difference between 3 guys playing with injuries (all of whom may require surgery), and 1 guy out of the most of the game, versus entirely healthy ... no? Edited February 3, 2015 by JTSP
Beef Jerky Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 didnt say some of them werent pre-existing .... and question remains: can you name another super bowl team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery after the game? Or for that matter, any team where 4 starters in the secondary required surgery at end of season? Ongoing to say GB since they win a Super Bo with more injuries to players then any two other teams put together.
Mr. WEO Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 sherman, thomas, cam all played with injuries -- sherman (surgery), thomas (surgery most likely), cam (possible) lane was KO'd of the game early after picking brady kind of a difference between 3 guys playing with injuries (all of whom may require surgery), and 1 guy out of the most of the game, versus entirely healthy ... no? If yesterday was just the NFCC game and the SB was next week, all 3 would be playing without question. They played well yesterday.
Mr. WEO Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Legion of Boo-Boos more like it. Legion of Boo Hoos...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 the injured D had nothing to do with the INEPT play of the offense in the 4th QTR by the Seahawks
YoloinOhio Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 @AroundTheNFL: Kam Chancellor played through torn MCL in addition to bone bruise http://t.co/iRaDuCkuDN
Recommended Posts