Keukasmallies Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 When will those in the spotlight learn that the short run impact of telling the truth when caught in a compromising situation is much preferred to coverup lies that feed the nagging issue over the long term? Don't we all know by now that the coverup results in more significant blowback than the simple truth; can we see that developing a coverup results in TWO problems: The original transgression plus the coverup? Case in point: Benghazi. The fact that this simple truth is lost in the context of political arrogance just baffles me; how 'bout you, Sheldon? Sail on, Oh ship of state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Sheldon Silver (D - NY) is not a good example for this, because he is not covering up a single event, but a lifetime of payoffs and cronyism. ..........unless you meant him............... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted January 26, 2015 Author Share Posted January 26, 2015 Sheldon Silver (D - NY) is not a good example for this, because he is not covering up a single event, but a lifetime of payoffs and cronyism. ..........unless you meant him............... . Actually my example is Benghazi. I could have added Deflategate and any number of others. I referenced Shelly Silver as one mired in political arrogance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Actually my example is Benghazi. I could have added Deflategate and any number of others. I referenced Shelly Silver as one mired in political arrogance. Not sure anything the administration said would have stopped the malicious lies to have spread about that attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The malicious lies are that the video caused the attack and that Hillary and the state department did all they could. All put forward by the imbicle-in-chief Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Not sure anything the administration said would have stopped the malicious lies to have spread about that attack The first thing the administration could have done would be to not create the malicious lies in the first place. But it'll be hard to make that case to a person like yourself who cheered the way the WH and State Department left four Americans for dead and then spent weeks lying about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted January 26, 2015 Author Share Posted January 26, 2015 Wacka + LABillzFan = +2! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 ..........unless you meant him............... . What the hell do I have to do with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What the hell do I have to do with this? That explains a lot...................... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What the hell do I have to do with this? Not even you are that annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts