OCinBuffalo Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Lesbian Asians do at least have one marketable skill in the Internet age Come now, you didn't really think lesbian Asian was a random choice, did you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Come now, you didn't really think lesbian Asian was a random choice, did you? Freudian pun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Freudian pun? No, that's just how I talk. I take out the "on" from "Come on now", because it seems to work better. Which... Well now I'm not quite sure what that does, makes it better, or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 it's the american way. thems the rules. change the game, change the rules. but most don't want to. somehow they believe that given the right opportunity, they can win. becoming prez is winning. it comes with perks. Is it your belief that the majority lives in poverty while a lucky handful "wins"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 it's the american way. thems the rules. change the game, change the rules. but most don't want to. somehow they believe that given the right opportunity, they can win. becoming prez is winning. it comes with perks. The way things are right now is "the american way." Why are Dems trying to change the rules by transferring wealth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Why are Dems trying to change the rules by transferring wealth? Because it buys them votes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Because it buys them votes? Okay, now that we've got the correct answer out of the way, I want to hear birddog's answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Good! I'm all for them creating a new no tax no government country. That would be awesome. “The America we thought we knew, ladies and gentlemen, is a mirage. It’s a memory. It’s a foreign country,” Jeff Deist, Ron Paul’s former press secretary and chief of staff, told the group. “And that’s precisely why we should take secession seriously.” From that bastion of conservative reporting, the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/03/07/texas-isnt-just-leading-the-nation-in-job-growth-its-doing-it-more-equitably-too/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I don't feel like starting a new thread, so since this one has gone from "oligarchs to lesbians" , I guess that I can dump the Left's latest thoughts on taxes here.............. Beyond parody': Lefties’ unbelievable take on stay at home parents This ridiculous snippet from the article at The Nation is going viral. And as Josh Barro points out, single-earner households are getting a bonus another way: the labor a mother or father performs in the home caring for a kid or wiping down a counter is unpaid and therefore goes untaxed. When two parents work outside the home and pay someone to watch their children, both those incomes are taxed. The link in that snippet points back to a New York Times blog post by Josh Barro with an equally ridiculous smart take. President Obama’s proposal to expand a tax break for working parents with children under 5 has some conservatives criticizing it for discriminating against stay-at-home parents. Those parents wouldn’t be able to take the proposed tax credit equal to 50 percent of child care expenses, up to a maximum of $3,000 per child. What the critics fail to see is that the playing field wasn’t level to begin with. The tax code is already hugely distorted in favor of stay-at-home parenting: Labor outside the home is taxed; household work, such as stay-at-home parenting, is not. (emphasis added) You see, by being a stay at home parent, you are a recipient of government benevolence because your “labor” is not taxed. Funny. We were always under the impression that it was income that was taxed, not labor. But the moonbats are actually arguing that by performing labor without income, you are technically stealing—or at least receiving benefits—from the government. Your labor is not your own. ."All your _______________ belongs to us" . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I don't feel like starting a new thread, so since this one has gone from "oligarchs to lesbians" , I guess that I can dump the Left's latest thoughts on taxes here.............. Beyond parody': Lefties’ unbelievable take on stay at home parents This ridiculous snippet from the article at The Nation is going viral. And as Josh Barro points out, single-earner households are getting a bonus another way: the labor a mother or father performs in the home caring for a kid or wiping down a counter is unpaid and therefore goes untaxed. When two parents work outside the home and pay someone to watch their children, both those incomes are taxed. The link in that snippet points back to a New York Times blog post by Josh Barro with an equally ridiculous smart take. President Obama’s proposal to expand a tax break for working parents with children under 5 has some conservatives criticizing it for discriminating against stay-at-home parents. Those parents wouldn’t be able to take the proposed tax credit equal to 50 percent of child care expenses, up to a maximum of $3,000 per child. What the critics fail to see is that the playing field wasn’t level to begin with. The tax code is already hugely distorted in favor of stay-at-home parenting: Labor outside the home is taxed; household work, such as stay-at-home parenting, is not. (emphasis added) You see, by being a stay at home parent, you are a recipient of government benevolence because your “labor” is not taxed. Funny. We were always under the impression that it was income that was taxed, not labor. But the moonbats are actually arguing that by performing labor without income, you are technically stealing—or at least receiving benefits—from the government. Your labor is not your own. ."All your _______________ belongs to us" . Wow, that is a dippy article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I don't feel like starting a new thread, so since this one has gone from "oligarchs to lesbians" , I guess that I can dump the Left's latest thoughts on taxes here.............. Beyond parody': Lefties’ unbelievable take on stay at home parents This ridiculous snippet from the article at The Nation is going viral. And as Josh Barro points out, single-earner households are getting a bonus another way: the labor a mother or father performs in the home caring for a kid or wiping down a counter is unpaid and therefore goes untaxed. When two parents work outside the home and pay someone to watch their children, both those incomes are taxed. The link in that snippet points back to a New York Times blog post by Josh Barro with an equally ridiculous smart take. President Obama’s proposal to expand a tax break for working parents with children under 5 has some conservatives criticizing it for discriminating against stay-at-home parents. Those parents wouldn’t be able to take the proposed tax credit equal to 50 percent of child care expenses, up to a maximum of $3,000 per child. What the critics fail to see is that the playing field wasn’t level to begin with. The tax code is already hugely distorted in favor of stay-at-home parenting: Labor outside the home is taxed; household work, such as stay-at-home parenting, is not. (emphasis added) You see, by being a stay at home parent, you are a recipient of government benevolence because your “labor” is not taxed. Funny. We were always under the impression that it was income that was taxed, not labor. But the moonbats are actually arguing that by performing labor without income, you are technically stealing—or at least receiving benefits—from the government. Your labor is not your own. ."All your _______________ belongs to us" . That's an absolutely absurd proposition, but it doesn't surprise me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 The way things are right now is "the american way." Why are Dems trying to change the rules by transferring wealth? in the same thread we have obama the oligarch and obama the socialist. how is that possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Wow, that is a dippy article. Holy, mother. Since when is work being done on its own, a taxable event? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 So any work performed at home should be taxable, be it child care or cleaning the house? LMMFAO! in the same thread we have obama the oligarch and obama the socialist. how is that possible. I have nothing to do with "Barry the oligarch" talk. What I'm saying is that Barry is a 1%er now. You say "that's the American way. Deal with it!" I say "the way things are right now is the American way. Deal with it instead of trying to take from others." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 in the same thread we have obama the oligarch and obama the socialist. how is that possible. Um...because the two aren't even close to being mutually exclusive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Now I'm beginning to understand those mindless posts in comments on Intarweb pages everywhere... to whit: "I earn $17.95 an hour for staying home and doing virtually nothing. My cousin's first wife's hermaphrodite stepchild made $37,000 last year and he/she can't even wipe its own azz. Contact me at paloolalolola@obamagivesawayfreeshit.com to learn how!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts