Ted William's frozen head Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Weighed it? What could they have done to it? The ball should be inflated to 13 lbs. of pressure. Pretty easy to measure that with a pressure gauge.
plenzmd1 Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 (edited) Oh Jesus Christ, they won by 38 points. They could have been using a marshmallow and this wouldn't have mattered. This is getting old and makes us look like jealous idiots. And for theove of God, enough with the asterisks askter the name Pats. It's childish, but more importantly MAKES NO SENSE. You're not questioning their name. If you want to use it after one of the Titles (should you mention one of those), it's still childish, but at lease it makes sense - if that's what you're going after. I agree almost 100% Steve, as I mentioned think this is much ado about nothing, just like last week. However , I love the asterisk thing. I have a ton of Pats fan friends, and I always include and drives them bat chit crazy ? Kinda fun! Edited January 19, 2015 by plenzmd1
filthymcnasty08 Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 It still amazes me to the day how Brady doesn't run through progressions like a normal QB. Snap - primary target- throw. That is unlike ANY other QB playing this game. When you know it's a zone - Edelman. When you know its man - Gronk. etc. When you know the defense, there's no stopping a smurfy little sh-t on a 3-5 yard out.
Kelly the Dog Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 I haven't read a lot about this so please forgive my ignorance on it. But I did read that "several" balls were taken out of the game. If the several footballs were all Patriot footballs, and none of them from the Colts, doesn't it automatically mean the Cheatriots were cheating? Each team brings their own. This seems pretty specific: "Rule 2 of the official NFL rule book requires that each team make “12 primary balls available for testing” two hours and 15 minutes before kickoff. The home team must make 12 backup balls available, and the visiting team may bring another 12 backup balls for games to be played outdoors."
Wayne Cubed Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 I haven't read a lot about this so please forgive my ignorance on it. But I did read that "several" balls were taken out of the game. If the several footballs were all Patriot footballs, and none of them from the Colts, doesn't it automatically mean the Cheatriots were cheating? Each team brings their own. The "several" is what is odd to me. I'm sure 1 or 2 come out a game and that's normal. Several makes it seem like a lot which is probably what jump started the investigation.
TheBillsWillRiseAgain Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Apparently there's a footage of some lackey on the Patriots' sideline intentionally deflating a ball that started this whole investigation.
filthymcnasty08 Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Apparently there's a footage of some lackey on the Patriots' sideline intentionally deflating a ball that started this whole investigation. Ohhhhh now that's the stuff!…..any links (non Peter Pan)?
TheBillsWillRiseAgain Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Sorry, just scrolled back down my facebook news feed and I was wrong. Victim of tricky social media headlines. UPROXX posted a video link earlier that said Patriots were being investigated for deflating balls and the picture was someone bent over on the sidelines doing something, but when you click on the link it just plays the video of when the refs stopped the game to switch the balls.
Vark Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 So do we have to call them the Patriots** now? Or is there an easy symbol for a second offense? How about Patriots*2
Doug Flutie Band Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Oh Jesus Christ, they won by 38 points. They could have been using a marshmallow and this wouldn't have mattered. This is getting old and makes us look like jealous idiots. And for the love of God, enough with the asterisks askter the name Pats. It's childish, but more importantly MAKES NO SENSE. You're not questioning their name. If you want to use it after one of the Titles (should you mention one of those), it's still childish, but at lease it makes sense - if that's what you're going after. This.
Rubes Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 The ball should be inflated to 13 lbs. of pressure. Pretty easy to measure that with a pressure gauge. Ah, I see. I was thinking of "weighing" in the usual manner.
NoSaint Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Have Mike and Mike on in the background, not one mention of this yet. For the record, I believe this is much ado about nothing, but it is a story and has been confirmed by NFL it is being investigated and should be reported. Likely waiting to find out what the story is before diving in to a full discussion
papazoid Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Oh Jesus Christ, they won by 38 points. They could have been using a marshmallow and this wouldn't have mattered. This is getting old and makes us look like jealous idiots. And for theove of God, enough with the asterisks askter the name Pats. It's childish, but more importantly MAKES NO SENSE. You're not questioning their name. If you want to use it after one of the Titles (should you mention one of those), it's still childish, but at lease it makes sense - if that's what you're going after. yep
Fadingpain Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Oh Jesus Christ, they won by 38 points. They could have been using a marshmallow and this wouldn't have mattered. This is getting old and makes us look like jealous idiots. And for theove of God, enough with the asterisks askter the name Pats. It's childish, but more importantly MAKES NO SENSE. You're not questioning their name. If you want to use it after one of the Titles (should you mention one of those), it's still childish, but at lease it makes sense - if that's what you're going after. Hey Steve... Whether the deflated balls directly or indirectly impacted the game on any level or its outcome has absolutely nothing to do with the crime here. You get that, right? If an NFL rule states a team's balls must be within a given PSI range, and it is then determined that NE was deliberately modifying balls to keep them OUTSIDE of that PSI range, they have broken the rule. HERE IS THE PROBLEM: how is it determined, exactly, that NE deliberately altered PSI levels in balls? Especially on a cold, wet night where pressure in the ball would lower due to physics, not the Patriots' code of ethics? How many balls were found to have low PSI? How low were they relative to accepted tolerances? How has this been handled in the past? I assume 1 ball is overlooked as an "aberration" or some such. What if 2 balls are found? 3? 5? How many do you need to find? Is there any accepted standard of review or precedent for this type of thing? Have rules been established to define what is a violation and what is not? For example, is there a rule in the NFL rulebook somewhere that says: "Keep the ball within this PSI range. If we find it is outside of that, we will remove the ball from play and replace with a new ball in a proper range" ??? Is that the "penalty" for violating the rule? Or is there a much more severe penalty that says "if we find 2 or more balls outside of proper PSI range, we will....what? Disqualify the offending team from the game? Suspend the HC for the next game played? What is the rule here, what is the standard of review, and what is the defined penalty. Without knowing these things, it's tough to have an intelligent conversation about this.
plenzmd1 Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Likely waiting to find out what the story is before diving in to a full discussion They did bring it up for a quick 2 minute segment
peterpan Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 It still amazes me to the day how Brady doesn't run through progressions like a normal QB. Snap - primary target- throw. That is unlike ANY other QB playing this game. When you know it's a zone - Edelman. When you know its man - Gronk. etc. When you know the defense, there's no stopping a smurfy little sh-t on a 3-5 yard out. Yep. its painfully obvious something is not right. Luck barely got the snap before having immediate pressure and all his receivers were blanketed. Meanwhile Brady looks like he doing a 7 on 7 walk through. This same stuff happens week after week after week. Its not that hard to defend a slant pass or a flat pass. There is obviously something fishy going on in NE.
Kelly the Dog Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Would it be okay if you were playing poker with a guy who cheated on a few hands but won most of the pots he collected legitimately? Or a golfer who hits 50 good shots but cheated on his lie on a few of them? Hell no. He's a cheater. It's the worst thing you can be in a competition, especially for money. People who look for and take every single advantage they can within the rules are fierce competitors. People who look for that, AND take a bunch of advantages outside of the rules are scumbag cheaters.
Pneumonic Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Was Eric Mangini spotted anywhere in the vicinity of the footballs with one of these ?
Fadingpain Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 (edited) The ball should be inflated to 13 lbs. of pressure. Pretty easy to measure that with a pressure gauge. And who measures? How do we know they are using the gauge correctly? Did they leak 1 PSI of air out of the ball when they inserted it b/c they got a bad seal for 2 seconds until they got a good seal? Who makes the pressure gauge? Most are cheap junk. How do we know the accuracy of the gauge? What about the ambient air temperature at the time of measuring "suspect balls" during the game? They had been out and in use in like 40 degree weather. As temp drops, volume of air drops, and with lower volume comes lower pressure. What gas is used to inflate an NFL football for an NFL game? Normal environmental air!? Or are using something much more stable and predictable and less temperature sensitive, like nitrogen? I'm guessing the answer to all of the above is: "It's a circus act and no one, ever, has given thought to any of this." And for this reason NE will walk. Why? B/C "It's just too hard to prove intent and no on really gives a crap about ball pressure and there is no precedent for how to handle this and well...let's just sweep this under the rug." This is probably one reason why NE did this. They aren't dumb and they know it's a great rule to break...b/c you can get away with it. Edited January 19, 2015 by Stopthepain
stevestojan Posted January 19, 2015 Posted January 19, 2015 Hey Steve... Whether the deflated balls directly or indirectly impacted the game on any level or its outcome has absolutely nothing to do with the crime here. You get that, right? If an NFL rule states a team's balls must be within a given PSI range, and it is then determined that NE was deliberately modifying balls to keep them OUTSIDE of that PSI range, they have broken the rule. HERE IS THE PROBLEM: how is it determined, exactly, that NE deliberately altered PSI levels in balls? Especially on a cold, wet night where pressure in the ball would lower due to physics, not the Patriots' code of ethics? How many balls were found to have low PSI? How low were they relative to accepted tolerances? How has this been handled in the past? I assume 1 ball is overlooked as an "aberration" or some such. What if 2 balls are found? 3? 5? How many do you need to find? Is there any accepted standard of review or precedent for this type of thing? Have rules been established to define what is a violation and what is not? For example, is there a rule in the NFL rulebook somewhere that says: "Keep the ball within this PSI range. If we find it is outside of that, we will remove the ball from play and replace with a new ball in a proper range" ??? Is that the "penalty" for violating the rule? Or is there a much more severe penalty that says "if we find 2 or more balls outside of proper PSI range, we will....what? Disqualify the offending team from the game? Suspend the HC for the next game played? What is the rule here, what is the standard of review, and what is the defined penalty. Without knowing these things, it's tough to have an intelligent conversation about this. Don't get me wrong, if they did in fact do this, there should be sanctions. But the vitriol for a team that is simply dominant, and the childish ways many of us discuss it, is unbelievable to me. And the thread about not watching the SB? I'm sorry, isn't the point of the SB to have the two best teams play each other? Can ANYONE argue that this won't be the case in two Sundays?
Recommended Posts