johnwalter Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 "I know EJ is somebody that we looked at when he came out. I think the entire league did. I feel like he has a lot of traits that you look for in a quarterback. He's smart, he's dedicated. I think he has movement skills. I'd like to see him use his legs more than he has. Sometimes, just like we mentioned through coaching and even playing quarterback, I think a little more experience the better you are going to be. The more comfortable you are going to be. He'll certainly be given an opportunity here." I thought this was by far the most interesting/revealing thing Rex said at his introductory presser. Does this, plus the Roman hiring, indicate that Buffalo will be running a full-blown, read-option offense next season?
boyst Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 He does have nice legs. But I'd rather dwvelop the dude as a QB then a runner
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) He does have nice legs. But I'd rather dwvelop the dude as a QB then a runner obviously. BUT you can't deny that you've never said "Damn I wish our QB could do that" when an opposing QB rushed in for the winning TD against the Bills!! having the option to run more is in line with what SF did with Kap no? Edited January 15, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
Kelly the Dog Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 Some guys are all about breasts, some ass, Rex is all about legs and feet. To each his own.
Fan in Chicago Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 He does have nice legs. Some guys are all about breasts, some ass, Rex is all about legs and feet. To each his own.
Jobu Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 Some guys are all about breasts, some ass, Rex is all about legs and feet. To each his own. I am about equal parts breasts and ass.
MDH Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 It already demonstrates the differences between Marrone's staff and Rex's. It's pretty obvious that after the injuries Marrone and Hackett told EJ to not run it. I'd really like something in between. Something like Rogers or Luck. If it's not there run it. They'll get 15-30 yards a game in scrambles but it's not a staple of their O.
NoSaint Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 "I know EJ is somebody that we looked at when he came out. I think the entire league did. I feel like he has a lot of traits that you look for in a quarterback. He's smart, he's dedicated. I think he has movement skills. I'd like to see him use his legs more than he has. Sometimes, just like we mentioned through coaching and even playing quarterback, I think a little more experience the better you are going to be. The more comfortable you are going to be. He'll certainly be given an opportunity here." I thought this was by far the most interesting/revealing thing Rex said at his introductory presser. Does this, plus the Roman hiring, indicate that Buffalo will be running a full-blown, read-option offense next season? there is a pretty wide range between a full blown read option and the stay in the pocket concepts. i think EJs legs are the type that convert you a few extra 3rd and 5 plays when stuff is covered downfield, but not running ALL the time... those are important conversions and he has the skill to get them.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 i think EJs legs are the type that convert you a few extra 3rd and 5 plays when stuff is covered downfield, but not running ALL the time... those are important conversions and he has the skill to get them. exactly.
NoSaint Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 It already demonstrates the differences between Marrone's staff and Rex's. It's pretty obvious that after the injuries Marrone and Hackett told EJ to not run it. I'd really like something in between. Something like Rogers or Luck. If it's not there run it. They'll get 15-30 yards a game in scrambles but it's not a staple of their O. exactly. even a guy like alex smith can be a thorn in your side with those conversions. i dont want him to be RG3, but i want the defense to either have to keep an eye on the QB (opening up WRs) or get burned with some easy first downs and then he gets to the ground/sideline
Dorkington Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) I'd like to see him move more, but that doesn't mean QB running plays, and exposing him to injury. Things like moving the pocket can go a long way towards giving him time to throw, and breaking down a defense. Edited January 15, 2015 by Dorkington
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2015/01/15/whaley-on-what-makes-romans-o-effective/ why Doug likes Romans Offense Edited January 15, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever
NoSaint Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 I'd like to see him move more, but that doesn't mean QB running plays, and exposing him to injury. Things like moving the pocket can go a long way towards giving him time to throw, and breaking down a defense. im even ok with the occasional read option where he takes the option himself. if we run it and in a month he keeps the ball 10 times, and 3 or 4 times he passes and 6-7 he runs, a defense has to stay honest -- which opens lanes for the RBs
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 im even ok with the occasional read option where he takes the option himself. if we run it and in a month he keeps the ball 10 times, and 3 or 4 times he passes and 6-7 he runs, a defense has to stay honest -- which opens lanes for the RBs see above
mountainwampus Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 EJ is mobile but he's not a running QB. It's just not going to happen. Just because his 40 time was fast doesn't mean he has any ball carrying skills or that he can take a hit.
Dorkington Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 im even ok with the occasional read option where he takes the option himself. if we run it and in a month he keeps the ball 10 times, and 3 or 4 times he passes and 6-7 he runs, a defense has to stay honest -- which opens lanes for the RBs Yeah, that's reasonable, as long as the coaching is there to teach him to not take giant hits.
NoSaint Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 see above yup -- i havent watched A TON of the niners, but i think the people that are saying they run well because they have gore and a good OL and the OC wasnt a big part of that are short selling how creative he is in the run game. the talent is big too, but he does a lot to keep defenses on their heels and create false steps/hesitation. its the type of stuff a was posting about ALL SEASON when we were watching straight runs behind the guards, or the previous read option stuff with no actual options. the 9ers and seattle both do a lot to help the run game beyond just having good backs.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 It already demonstrates the differences between Marrone's staff and Rex's. It's pretty obvious that after the injuries Marrone and Hackett told EJ to not run it. I'd really like something in between. Something like Rogers or Luck. If it's not there run it. They'll get 15-30 yards a game in scrambles but it's not a staple of their O. Agree. They really coached EJ to play scared-- not get injured, not make mistakes. I wonder if he is a lost cause or these guys can coach him back up again.
Buftex Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 I am about equal parts breasts and ass. No, complete ass! j/k
GG Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 there is a pretty wide range between a full blown read option and the stay in the pocket concepts. i think EJs legs are the type that convert you a few extra 3rd and 5 plays when stuff is covered downfield, but not running ALL the time... those are important conversions and he has the skill to get them. Or a broken 3rd & 1 play?
Recommended Posts