Dante Posted January 13, 2015 Posted January 13, 2015 (edited) This thread can't get any more depressing. I really hope our choices are going to be better than a couple rhino's and radical left wing nut jobs like Hillary? If this is what it comes to were fugged. Seriously another freeking Bush and a loser milktoast opponent like Mitt? Really Mitt is like a palooka fighter you put in the ring so the upcoming guy can get a easy win. For the first time ever I totally agree with gatorman only I would change the thread title to "WTF Are You Kidding? Mitt?" Subtitled "The Fix Is In. Let's Let Hillary Win" Edited January 13, 2015 by Dante
IDBillzFan Posted January 13, 2015 Posted January 13, 2015 This thread can't get any more depressing. I really hope our choices are going to be better than a couple rhino's and radical left wing nut jobs like Hillary? If this is what it comes to were fugged. Seriously another freeking Bush and a loser milktoast opponent like Mitt? Really Mitt is like a palooka fighter you put in the ring so the upcoming guy can get a easy win. For the first time ever I totally agree with gatorman only I would change the thread title to "WTF Are You Kidding? Mitt?" Subtitled "The Fix Is In. Let's Let Hillary Win" I wouldn't mind hearing what Scott Walker has to say. Given how he made the unions his ever-loving B word in Wisconsin, the man can fight. And he does well on the conservative scales.
FireChan Posted January 13, 2015 Posted January 13, 2015 This thread can't get any more depressing. I really hope our choices are going to be better than a couple rhino's and radical left wing nut jobs like Hillary? If this is what it comes to were fugged. Seriously another freeking Bush and a loser milktoast opponent like Mitt? Really Mitt is like a palooka fighter you put in the ring so the upcoming guy can get a easy win. For the first time ever I totally agree with gatorman only I would change the thread title to "WTF Are You Kidding? Mitt?" Subtitled "The Fix Is In. Let's Let Hillary Win" Milktoast.
Dante Posted January 13, 2015 Posted January 13, 2015 I wouldn't mind hearing what Scott Walker has to say. Given how he made the unions his ever-loving B word in Wisconsin, the man can fight. And he does well on the conservative scales. I would gladly consider him, Paul, Cruz etc over any of the establishment guys.
Dante Posted January 13, 2015 Posted January 13, 2015 ... milquetoast Internet spell checkers to the rescue. Thank you for your pettiness ....I mean service.
Chef Jim Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 ... milquetoast You eat what you want he'll eat what he wants.
Nanker Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 You eat what you want he'll eat what he wants. Cassoulet and a bottle of burgundy here, please.
Chef Jim Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 (edited) Cassoulet and a bottle of burgundy here, please. Good choice. I make the best cassoulet. Ruth Reichl the food critic of the LA Times and editor in chief of Gourmet Magazine would order two when she came in. One to eat there and the other to take home for later. Edited January 14, 2015 by Chef Jim
3rdnlng Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 Good choice. I make the best cassoulet. Ruth Reichl the food critic of the LA Times and editor in chief of Gourmet Magazine would order two when she came in. One to eat there and the other to take home for later. I'll stick to the Abalone, thank you very much.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted January 14, 2015 Author Posted January 14, 2015 This thread can't get any more depressing. I really hope our choices are going to be better than a couple rhino's and radical left wing nut jobs like Hillary? If this is what it comes to were fugged. Seriously another freeking Bush and a loser milktoast opponent like Mitt? Really Mitt is like a palooka fighter you put in the ring so the upcoming guy can get a easy win. For the first time ever I totally agree with gatorman only I would change the thread title to "WTF Are You Kidding? Mitt?" Subtitled "The Fix Is In. Let's Let Hillary Win" I don't see how anyone with a clear head can disagree with this. Mitt or Bush means an easy Hillary win, IMO GOP needs a fresh face
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 GOP needs a fresh face Yes, the GOP will follow the advice of a guy who looks forward to voting for the woman who left four Americans to die in Benghazi. Because if you can't vote for someone who makes you laugh, who can you vote for, ammiright, gatorman?
B-Man Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 (edited) One has to wonder about the lack of intellect that declares the need for a fresh face in just one party Hillary -- Washington DC insider since 1992 (23 years for the mathematically challenged) and Mitt and Jeb -- 2 governors who have never been in the federal government. IMO we DO need an outside (fresh ) face, but certainly not these three. . Edited January 14, 2015 by B-Man
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted January 14, 2015 Author Posted January 14, 2015 One has to wonder about the lack of intellect that declares the need for a fresh face in just one party Hillary -- Washington DC insider since 1992 (23 years for the mathematically challenged) and Mitt and Jeb -- 2 governors who have never been in the federal government. IMO we DO need an outside (fresh ) face, but certainly not these three. . I should have said fresh face if they want to win. Hillary can win, Mitt and Bush-0 can't, IMO Heck, I don't think the two GOP boobs can even win their primaries, but the GOP field, as usual, is insanely weak, so who knows
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 (edited) One has to wonder about the lack of intellect that declares the need for a fresh face in just one party Though hardly surprising. The leftists who carry their Je Suis Charlie posters because they claim to fight for freedom of speech will spend months begging everyone to boycott Chick-Fil-A and the state of Airzona because someone said something they found offensive. If you think about it, it's rather helpful that THAT level of stupidity gathers in one party. Edited January 14, 2015 by LABillzFan
Doc Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 Shrillary wasn't so fresh faced in 2008. It will be 8 years later. Do the math.
DC Tom Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 Shrillary wasn't so fresh faced in 2008. It will be 8 years later. Do the math. If the ACA and this new "free associate's degree" plan is any example, democrats can't do math. Probably because they were educated under Common Core.
Chef Jim Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 I should have said fresh face if they want to win. Hillary can win, Mitt and Bush-0 can't, IMO Heck, I don't think the two GOP boobs can even win their primaries, but the GOP field, as usual, is insanely weak, so who knows So you're basing the GOP field on who said they're running in January of 2015. Talk about boobs.
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 Talk about boobs. Not certain he could do even that.
Recommended Posts