Franchiseneedsme Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I think he is a free agent after this year. He is playing lights out. We could cut Mcelvein loose, and save some $. Rex and Revis love each other and would be scary
ChevyVanMiller Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I think Revis in a Bills uni would look pretty sweet. I fully expect hi to be a primary target in FA.
Ronin Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Come on, if you're Revis and NE makes you a respectable offer, do you come here instead? Use your head. Love Ryan, love Roman if he comes here, Harris may come whom we can use, but Revis, highly doubtful. I mean you'd be thinking that a player that has a legitimate shot at a ring(s) would come here. That's silly. Revis only has a few seasons left before he loses his speed and is no longer a premier CB, he has to maximize his chances. You can thank Whaley for us not being SB contenders this or next season regardless of who our coach would be.
thronethinker Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 (edited) Revis has a 2 year deal with NE. Edited January 11, 2015 by thronethinker
ChevyVanMiller Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Come on, if you're Revis and NE makes you a respectable offer, do you come here instead? Substitute Ryan for Revis and Atl for NE and that's exactly what all of the national pundits were saying right up until this morning. Revis has a 2 year deal with NE. Not without an astronomical salary that NE will not pay. He'll be a FA for sure. http://espn.go.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4760152/details-on-darrelle-revis-contract
17 Josh Allen Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 that is not true, Revis is a free agent after this season get it done Rex
EmotionallyUnstable Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Too much money for an aging corner. Wouldn't be surprised to see one drafted though
buffalo2218 Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I think he is a free agent after this year. He is playing lights out. We could cut Mcelvein loose, and save some $. Rex and Revis love each other and would be scary Way too much money for a position that's adequate enough with who we have on the roster now. No way I risk losing Hughes and possibly Dareus for Revis, that'd be the ultimate in lose lose
OldTimer1960 Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 The Bills already have a LOT of money tied up in the defense and hopefully can keep Hughes which will also cost a lot. They need to leave room to spend on the offense.
QuoteTheRaven83 Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 No LOL. You're crazy. Think about that pass rush with Revis, McKelvin, and Gilmore at Corner. You kidding me?
Franchiseneedsme Posted January 11, 2015 Author Posted January 11, 2015 (edited) How much will Gillmore want? If we are going to give Gilmore 10m a year, y not just give Revis 12m now and have both of them for 1 year. I'm all for letting Huges walk.. Y pay him 10m when we could draft a 3rd rounder to get 6-7 sacks.hell if Wynn played the full time last year, I'll bet he would have had 9-10 sacks last year Edited January 11, 2015 by Franchiseneedsme
Kelly the Dog Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I'm not sure I want this but it did occur to me... I want the Bills to re-sign Hughes. But... with Rex here. We could probably sign Revis and Brandon Spikes for the same amount of money. The rush without Hughes, but having Gilmore, Revis, McKelvin, Graham and Robey in the defensive backfield?
Kirby Jackson Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I'm not sure I want this but it did occur to me... I want the Bills to re-sign Hughes. But... with Rex here. We could probably sign Revis and Brandon Spikes for the same amount of money. The rush without Hughes, but having Gilmore, Revis, McKelvin, Graham and Robey in the defensive backfield? They are asking on Twitter would you rather sign Revis or Hughes? I think that it is Revis for the system that we will be playing. The pressure will still be there. Obviously I'd like both but if you said pick one it's Revis for me.
Kelly the Dog Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 They are asking on Twitter would you rather sign Revis or Hughes? I think that it is Revis for the system that we will be playing. The pressure will still be there. Obviously I'd like both but if you said pick one it's Revis for me. It depends on if we keep Schwartz or if he leaves and it's all a Rex defense.
Kirby Jackson Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 It depends on if we keep Schwartz or if he leaves and it's all a Rex defense.My guess is that Schwartz will stay but will have to adopt some of the aggressive blitzing schemes of Rex.
Johnny Hammersticks Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Why would we break the bank for a player at a position which we are already very strong? Yes, Revis is very, very good. But we have other, more pressing personnel needs, IMO.
buffalo2218 Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 They are asking on Twitter would you rather sign Revis or Hughes? I think that it is Revis for the system that we will be playing. The pressure will still be there. Obviously I'd like both but if you said pick one it's Revis for me. But as of right now, we don't know what system we'll be playing, especially if Schwartz stays. If he does stay, and Rex lets him run the defense, we won't need Revis, keyword there being need
Kelly the Dog Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Why would we break the bank for a player at a position which we are already very strong? Yes, Revis is very, very good. But we have other, more pressing personnel needs, IMO. If no one is getting open, Mario, Dareus, Kyle and Player X are going to get about 45 sacks
Recommended Posts