Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Crazy precedent.

 

Its no different than if a person robbing a bank causes someone to be killed when a cop shoos at them, they are liable for murder. They didn't pull the trigger but their act of robbing the bank was the cause of that person being killed.

 

He caused the incident to occur according to the evidence presented, and is held responsible for it...

Edited by matter2003
Posted (edited)

Pacmans a dirt bag and he lost in the highest court. That ain't your local Amherst town court. That pretty much proves he did something wrong

Edited by ldandria
Posted

Pacmans a dirt bag and he lost in the highest court. That ain't your local Amherst town court. That pretty much proves he did something wrong

Well, not really. The higher courts are only looking for a !@#$up in law, not reviewing the facts of the case.

×
×
  • Create New...