Tipster19 Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 Me personally I'd like an open field stadium. I like that later in the season that the weather makes a difference. To me it keeps football old school and and how it was originally meant to be played. Unfortunately the almighty dollar might make a difference here, especially if the Pegulas have designs on hosting a Super Bowl, if that could ever be a possibility.
Beef Jerky Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 The next stadium will have a roof overhead, that isn't going to be debatable. What is debatable is what kind of roof the stadium will have over the top. I like the stadium the Vikings are building for example.
papazoid Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 after losing a home game to snow. Â must be a retractable roof for year round use.
vorpma Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 At the moment I want a competent football organization!
ALF Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 It's up to Terry and Kim to decide. Ralph vetoed a dome in favor of the present stadium. I would prefer the roof this time, weather is getting more extreme
runner Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 Indoor stadium downtown. Forget the retractable roof. (and not all enclosed stadiums are domes.....I hate that word!)
Captain Caveman Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 This really should be a poll. My vote goes to open.
bigK14094 Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 A dome is inevetible....and, as I have gotten older, the cold hurts worse than it used to...I am a long time season ticket holder. (I was there to open the Ralph) I guess I can't agree with those who want it downtown, however, as the roads in and out are inadequate for an event that has a crowd of 75K. Need a venue with roads out in 4 directions......the Lake is to big an obstacle downtown. That is not the politically correct view, but a very practical view wrt the sale of game day tickets imho. Nobody wants to go to a game that takes 3 hours to get back home after its over.
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 after losing a home game to snow.must be a retractable roof for year round use. That game would have been moved whether the game was to be played in a dome, or not... The parking lots, and surrounding roads, were impassible, it makes no difference what condition the playing surface was in.
freeagentqb Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 dome for sure. Think that old idea that we have a cold weather advantage is over. Especially with the winds downtown, games would be a mess.
Charles Romes Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 The idea of playing arena football indoors sickens me. On the other hand it would open the pool of potential savior QBs. We would just need a franchise QB not necessarily a strong armed franchise QB. On the other hand the idea of winning with a weak armed dome specialist QB sickens me. I'll take the outdoors.
frogger Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 Doomed oh I mean domed...buffalo becomes a more attractive place to play and indoor stadium gives the city/state/pegs a place to use for other events.
K D Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 Retractable roof that stays open for football games no matter the weather. Make it a smaller opening in the roof so the fans are still covered for the most part. But if the Bills don't play in snow then they aren't the Bills
boyst Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 NE,GB, NYG, Cleveland, Chicago, Seattle. All open field stadiums. If any thing covers the field I want it retractable and left open until season ends.
voodoo poonani Posted January 4, 2015 Posted January 4, 2015 Domed. Open does not offer us an advantage anymore. Besides if you want to sell out games and use it for other events, it must have a dome.
Recommended Posts