Whack 'Em Williams Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Plain and simple. Hire him now as OC and demote Hackett to something else to tickle his ego still.
dave mcbride Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Here is his record. He was a position coach prior to 1989, but his first year as an OC was in 1989. 1989: Cleveland (OC) - 14th in points; 16th in yards (appearance in AFC championship game) -- most importantly, he was the opposing coordinator in the 34-31 Ronnie Harmon game. 1990: Minn (qb coach) - 9th in points; 12th in yards 1991: Minn (qb coach) - 10th in points; 13th in yards 1995: SF (OC) - 1st in points; 2nd in yards 1996: SF (OC) - 3rd in points; 6th in yards 1997: Detroit (qb coach) - 4th in points; 2nd in yards 1998: AZ (OC) - 15th in points; 13th in yards (they had been 25th and 24th the year before) 1999: AZ (OC) - 30th in points; 29th in yards 2000: AZ (OC) - 29th in points; 24th in yards 2001: Oak (QB coach) - 4th in points; 7th in yards 2002: Oak (OC) - 2nd in points; 1st in yards 2003: Oak (OC) - 26th in points; 25th in yards (Gannon got hurt early in the season) 2013: Chi (HC) - 2nd in points; 8th in yards 2014: Chi (HC) - 23rd in points; 21st in yards
John from Riverside Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 A mixed bag much like Schwartz....we need to dig deeper
fridge Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 His success seems predicated on the talent of his QB. I realize that's not a wild statement, as it's likely the case for 95% of OC's, but I don't know what to expect out of his offense. Would he really implement creativity that caters to the players on the field, or would he force a system down everyone's throat?
The Big Cat Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 You mean to tell me Trestman has had success where he's had adequate QB play and struggles elsewhere? No kidding.
dave mcbride Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 (edited) His success seems predicated on the talent of his QB. I realize that's not a wild statement, as it's likely the case for 95% of OC's, but I don't know what to expect out of his offense. Would he really implement creativity that caters to the players on the field, or would he force a system down everyone's throat? Yeah, that's true, but it's pretty much the same for every coach. Arians' Cardinals were 24th in points and 24th in yards this year, and it was due solely to the QB situation. Arians is a very good offensive coach, but there's only so much you can do when your QBs go down. Trestman did OK with a young Gannon in Minnesota (1999-1991). I have no idea why the Cardinals plummeted in 1999 and 2000 though. The Lions improved dramatically from 20th/21st in 1996 to 4th/2nd in 1997, which is when Trestman arrived in Detroit. That said, he was the QB coach. On the other hand, he managed to get a great season out of Scott Mitchell ... One interesting fact - Sean Payton/the Saints hired Trestman as a consultant in 2007, when Marrone was the OC for the Saints. Edited December 30, 2014 by dave mcbride
fridge Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Yeah, that's true, but it's pretty much the same for every coach. Arians' Cardinals were 24th in points and 24th in yards this year, and it was due solely to the QB situation. Arians is a very good offensive coach, but there's only so much you can do when your QBs go down. Trestman did OK with a young Gannon in Minnesota (1999-1991). I have no idea why the Cardinals plummeted in 1999 and 2000 though. Freudian slip?
dave mcbride Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Freudian slip? Ha. Maybe. I edited my post above, btw.
1billsfan Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 You mean to tell me Trestman has had success where he's had adequate QB play and struggles elsewhere? No kidding. 2013 - Josh McCown / 5 starts with the Bears - 109 QB rating / 86 QBR. If he can do that with McCown, I'd like to see what he could do with Manuel.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 2013 - Josh McCown / 5 starts with the Bears - 109 QB rating / 86 QBR. If he can do that with McCown, I'd like to see what he could do with Manuel. If we are looking for a guy with a proven record of developing QBs, then Chan Gailey would be better. http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/12/20/1886892/ryan-fitzpatrick-is-chan-gaileys-latest-reclamation-project
Kelly the Dog Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Yeah, that's true, but it's pretty much the same for every coach. Arians' Cardinals were 24th in points and 24th in yards this year, and it was due solely to the QB situation. Arians is a very good offensive coach, but there's only so much you can do when your QBs go down. Trestman did OK with a young Gannon in Minnesota (1999-1991). I have no idea why the Cardinals plummeted in 1999 and 2000 though. The Lions improved dramatically from 20th/21st in 1996 to 4th/2nd in 1997, which is when Trestman arrived in Detroit. That said, he was the QB coach. On the other hand, he managed to get a great season out of Scott Mitchell ... One interesting fact - Sean Payton/the Saints hired Trestman as a consultant in 2007, when Marrone was the OC for the Saints. The Cards were pretty terrible. I lived in Phoenix in those years. Jake the Snake was extremely erratic. Vince Tobin was a crappy coach. Adrian Murrell was their best RB. Frank Sanders was pretty good but David Boston sucked. He had 1-2 good years total.
Mr. WEO Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Here is his record. He was a position coach prior to 1989, but his first year as an OC was in 1989. 1989: Cleveland (OC) - 14th in points; 16th in yards (appearance in AFC championship game) -- most importantly, he was the opposing coordinator in the 34-31 Ronnie Harmon game. 1990: Minn (qb coach) - 9th in points; 12th in yards 1991: Minn (qb coach) - 10th in points; 13th in yards 1995: SF (OC) - 1st in points; 2nd in yards 1996: SF (OC) - 3rd in points; 6th in yards 1997: Detroit (qb coach) - 4th in points; 2nd in yards 1998: AZ (OC) - 15th in points; 13th in yards (they had been 25th and 24th the year before) 1999: AZ (OC) - 30th in points; 29th in yards 2000: AZ (OC) - 29th in points; 24th in yards 2001: Oak (QB coach) - 4th in points; 7th in yards 2002: Oak (OC) - 2nd in points; 1st in yards 2003: Oak (OC) - 26th in points; 25th in yards (Gannon got hurt early in the season) 2013: Chi (HC) - 2nd in points; 8th in yards 2014: Chi (HC) - 23rd in points; 21st in yards He turns wine into water. Pass.
dave mcbride Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 He turns wine into water. Pass. Dunno about that. 2002 in Oakland was what it was because of Gannon going down early and having to rely on Rick Mirer and Marques Tuiasosopo, and the AZ offense improved dramatically from 1997 to 1998. His career strikes me as more complicated than that. Not saying he's great, btw. He has had both real success and real failure. A lot of depends on the QB he has, obviously.
Heitz Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 You guys just don't get it the OP's post is bold AND in large font - this guy means business. Also, finally a Trestman thread!
Mr. WEO Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Dunno about that. 2002 in Oakland was what it was because of Gannon going down early and having to rely on Rick Mirer and Marques Tuiasosopo, and the AZ offense improved dramatically from 1997 to 1998. His career strikes me as more complicated than that. Not saying he's great, btw. He has had both real success and real failure. A lot of depends on the QB he has, obviously. He was given a perennial top 10 QB and loaded offense at skill positions and couldn't put together a successful offense. What is the attraction? Soemthing he kind of succeeded at 12 years ago?
Kelly the Dog Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 He was given a perennial top 10 QB and... And yet if you were talking about Cutler, you would find a way to say he is the worst quarterback and terrible idea for the Bills and...
dave mcbride Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 He was given a perennial top 10 QB and loaded offense at skill positions and couldn't put together a successful offense. What is the attraction? Soemthing he kind of succeeded at 12 years ago? What are you referring to exactly? The Bears? They were second in points last season. I don't think he's coming to Buffalo in any case, and I guess I'd characterize my feelings about him as mixed. It's certainly not either/or - death or glory though (too much of that on this board in any case). He's better than many, he has experience, and he's allegedly a good communicator. But he's overseen some bad offenses too.
Mr. WEO Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 And yet if you were talking about Cutler, you would find a way to say he is the worst quarterback and terrible idea for the Bills and... The obvious point is that he took a top offense and destroyed it.
Kelly the Dog Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 The obvious point is that he took a top offense and destroyed it. And my obvious point is that you will take any post and make it look like the Bills are idiots, even if it means totally contradicting yourself.
The Big Cat Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 2013 - Josh McCown / 5 starts with the Bears - 109 QB rating / 86 QBR. If he can do that with McCown, I'd like to see what he could do with Manuel. Cool.
Recommended Posts