Kirby Jackson Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 12:47 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: The tight end position is irrelevent on this team until a profession qb is found. Does anyone think that even Gronk would do shiite on this team with the dreck wheeled out at qb? Yeah, don't address any other positions until you have a a QB. Just freeze and stop trying to improve the rest of your team. Great idea!!!
YoloinOhio Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 12:47 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: The tight end position is irrelevent on this team until a profession qb is found. Does anyone think that even Gronk would do shiite on this team with the dreck wheeled out at qb? i think a good TE can be a huge help to any QB. Even EJ found Chandler quite a bit. Also if they can be a real red zone threat and create matchup problems if huge + athletic. I don't know how that doesn't help a QB.
Momma Pecoraro Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 12:50 AM, Kirby Jackson said: Yeah, don't address any other positions until you have a a QB. Just freeze and stop trying to improve the rest of your team. Great idea!!! You have the most under utilized receivers in the game already with garbage throwing the rock. Your focus must be solely on a qb that can make all the throws, else you'll have yet another target standing idly with their hands up while shaking their head. Draft a 6th rounder sure, but find a qb. Outside of Gronk, Brady has thrown to mostly anonymous guys over his tenure. He's made Julian Edelman a star, which should illustrate that it isn't who is on the receiving end on the rock. But, by all means, get another stallion who never sees the ball, Watkins and Woods need company.
YoloinOhio Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 12:58 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: You have the most under utilized receivers in the game already with garbage throwing the rock. Your focus must be solely on a qb that can make all the throws, else you'll have yet another target standing idly with their hands up while shaking their head. Draft a 6th rounder sure, but find a qb. Outside of Gronk, Brady has thrown to mostly anonymous guys over his tenure. He's made Julian Edelman a star, which should illustrate that it isn't who is on the receiving end on the rock. But, by all means, get another stallion who never sees the ball, Watkins and Woods need company. when it comes to the 2nd and 3rd rd of this draft, they won't be choosing between a TE and a franchise QB.
Momma Pecoraro Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:00 AM, YoloinOhio said: when it comes to the 2nd and 3rd rd of this draft, they won't be choosing between a TE and a franchise QB. You're talking false choices, I'm talking the singular imperative to get a qb. If the Bills had a real quarterback they would win with Lee Smith as te, given watkins and woods.
YoloinOhio Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:04 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: You're talking false choices, I'm talking the singular imperative to get a qb. If the Bills had a real quarterback they would win with Lee Smith as te, given watkins and woods.So if they sign a QB in FA or trade for one are they allowed to draft a TE?
Solomon Grundy Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:04 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: You're talking false choices, I'm talking the singular imperative to get a qb. If the Bills had a real quarterback they would win with Lee Smith as te, given watkins and woods. Yeah, the Lee Smith who has a crucial drive killing penalty every game!!
Momma Pecoraro Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:14 AM, YoloinOhio said: So if they sign a QB in FA or trade for one are they allowed to draft a TE? Not 'a' qb, 'the' qb. On 1/27/2015 at 1:21 AM, the skycap said: Yeah, the Lee Smith who has a crucial drive killing penalty every game!! It's the qb, stupd.
YoloinOhio Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:23 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: Not 'a' qb, 'the' qb. It's the qb, stupd. who is "the" QB?
Momma Pecoraro Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:28 AM, YoloinOhio said: who is "the" QB? Who own the Chiefs?
Kirby Jackson Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 12:58 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: You have the most under utilized receivers in the game already with garbage throwing the rock. Your focus must be solely on a qb that can make all the throws, else you'll have yet another target standing idly with their hands up while shaking their head. Draft a 6th rounder sure, but find a qb. Outside of Gronk, Brady has thrown to mostly anonymous guys over his tenure. He's made Julian Edelman a star, which should illustrate that it isn't who is on the receiving end on the rock. But, by all means, get another stallion who never sees the ball, Watkins and Woods need company. How would you spend the 3rd most cap dollars in the league (or whatever) and all of your draft picks? Should you just forfeit it all because you don't have a QB?!? You still need to get better. QB is priority 1,2 and 3 but that doesn't mean you miss opportunities to get better.
Momma Pecoraro Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:30 AM, Kirby Jackson said: How would you spend the 3rd most cap dollars in the league (or whatever) and all of your draft picks? Should you just forfeit it all because you don't have a QB?!? You still need to get better. QB is priority 1,2 and 3 but that doesn't mean you miss opportunities to get better. No, but but with the QBs they have,and the type they;ve brought in, you'll continue to miss opportunities, every game.
Solomon Grundy Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:23 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: Not 'a' qb, 'the' qb. It's the qb, stupd. Stupd won't be buying a car from ewe
Kirby Jackson Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:33 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: No, but but with the QBs they have,and the type they;ve brought in, you'll continue to miss opportunities, every game.No one disagrees but you still have all of these resources to use. Improve the TE position, improve the OL, find a pounder at RB, resign Hughes and try to get a QB. Just because you don't have a QB doesn't mean that you shouldn't get better wherever you can.
Slack_in_MA Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 1:29 AM, Momma Pecoraro said: Who own the Chiefs? OWNS....OWNS....
Momma Pecoraro Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 (edited) On 1/27/2015 at 1:38 AM, the skycap said: Stupd won't be buying a car from ewe Oh hon, I'm just having hot flashes. On 1/27/2015 at 1:39 AM, Kirby Jackson said: No one disagrees but you still have all of these resources to use. Improve the TE position, improve the OL, find a pounder at RB, resign Hughes and try to get a QB. Just because you don't have a QB doesn't mean that you shouldn't get better wherever you can. -30- On 1/27/2015 at 1:43 AM, Slack_in_MA said: OWNS....OWNS.... He say he don't know. Edited January 27, 2015 by Momma Pecoraro
YoloinOhio Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 I will also be interested to see what happens with that Canisius Bball player they signed.
Kirby Jackson Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 1/27/2015 at 2:30 AM, YoloinOhio said: I will also be interested to see what happens with that Canisius Bball player they signed.That's my guy!! Supposedly he has been coming along nicely. He is VERY raw but may be a PS candidate. He has the ideal physical traits.
John from Riverside Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 On 12/29/2014 at 10:50 PM, jboyst62 said: 1) The Giants' Larry Donnell is a FA. So is Danny Fells. If you like them, maybe we can get them. 2) Moeki is a free agent. Fendi Onobun is, too. Lee Smith, also. 3) Charles Clay, Owen Daniels, Jordan Cameron, Matt Spaeth, among others are available. I don't see them being an option because of their cost and look to add someone in the 3rd or 4th who will be a better addition to this team by cost. Why would cost be a factor in the new Pegula bills? Given that Roman relies heavily on TE's ....dont be suprised if we spend some there
Recommended Posts