BillsVet Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 He has an obligation to appear on WGR every week and he answers the questions put forth. I don't think he tells them what questions to ask. GO BILLS!!! He also has answers to questions they don't ask. Like the time he told GR that the HC he hired had "changed the culture."
K-9 Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 He also has answers to questions they don't ask. Like the time he told GR that the HC he hired had "changed the culture." Wrong. WGR asked him to expand on his previous remarks made at the Quarterback Club luncheon regarding Marrone and the culture change. GO BILLS!!!
Sisyphean Bills Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 He has an obligation to appear on WGR every week and he answers the questions put forth. I don't think he tells them what questions to ask. GO BILLS!!! Not so much. He chooses how he is going to answer questions. For example, if someone asked anyone with a contract to appear on WGR when was the last time they had sex, are we to assume they are contractually obligated to answer to the millisecond?
K-9 Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Not so much. He chooses how he is going to answer questions. For example, if someone asked anyone with a contract to appear on WGR when was the last time they had sex, are we to assume they are contractually obligated to answer to the millisecond? At least you're objecting to the way he answered a direct question posed by someone else. That's different than people getting on his case for spouting off on subjects without being prompted. GO BILLS!!!
May Day 10 Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 He has never deferred a football question to my knowledge. Along with being all over the playing field at camp, meeting with prospective coaches and free agents, being front and center in the draft war room with materials scatiered in front of him, being shown at the hof game with an open laptop in front of him very deeply concentrating on the field, and just the fact that they had the audacity to try to crowbar him in as the gm in 2008. Can anyone fault anybody for gaining the perception that this guy carries heavy influence and opinion on the football side? I mentioned in a different thread I went to school for sports business for awhile. Pretty much everybody there including myself were there because our athletic careers were over or almost over, and we wanted to someday be a gm of a pro sports team. There is no way brandon is passing this opportunity up. I don't dislike the guy really or blame him. I just think the organization needs to wall off the business side completely with brandon behind the wall. I really don't believe he is a very good communicator through the media and/or burned a lot of his goodwill defending the Toronto series. Do we really think the bills can attract the harboughs, chip kellys, gruden of the world if they need to run everything through a business guy?
hondo in seattle Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 (edited) Food for thought from http://billsmafia.co...-nfl-offseason/ The Bills’ offensive line has surrendered 37 sacks, 82 QB Hits and 113 pressures. In simpler terms, Kyle Orton is getting hurried, hit or sacked on 38.2% of his dropbacks, the sixth highest rate among 27 qualifying quarterbacks… It’s tough to get passes off when a quarterback’s own lineman is sitting in his lap the instant the ball is snapped. So, Hackett relied on operating out of the shotgun. Move Orton a few yards back, create space between himself and the defenders in hopes of giving an extra split second to make a play. That’s why 449 of the Bills’ 556 dropbacks were out of a shotgun formation. But sometimes even that isn’t enough, as Orton’s snap-to-sack time of 3.14 seconds was the fourth fastest time at his position. Another way to limit an opponents’ pass rush is to get the ball out quickly, using screens, slants and quick, high-percentage short throws to move down the field. That’s why Orton’s average time from snap to attempt was 2.32 seconds, the third quickest time among 27 qualifying quarterbacks. Edited December 24, 2014 by hondo in seattle
Jauronimo Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 He has never deferred a football question to my knowledge. Along with being all over the playing field at camp, meeting with prospective coaches and free agents, being front and center in the draft war room with materials scatiered in front of him, being shown at the hof game with an open laptop in front of him very deeply concentrating on the field, and just the fact that they had the audacity to try to crowbar him in as the gm in 2008. Can anyone fault anybody for gaining the perception that this guy carries heavy influence and opinion on the football side? I mentioned in a different thread I went to school for sports business for awhile. Pretty much everybody there including myself were there because our athletic careers were over or almost over, and we wanted to someday be a gm of a pro sports team. There is no way brandon is passing this opportunity up. I don't dislike the guy really or blame him. I just think the organization needs to wall off the business side completely with brandon behind the wall. I really don't believe he is a very good communicator through the media and/or burned a lot of his goodwill defending the Toronto series. Do we really think the bills can attract the harboughs, chip kellys, gruden of the world if they need to run everything through a business guy? I won't fault anyone for forming that perception but I can't ignore the abundance of chatter over the years over who actually called the shots while Brandon was GM. In absence of anything credible pointing to specific football decisions hes made, I don't put much weight on the easy connect the dots.
Not at the table Karlos Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 Since he became president we have had a better roster than we have had since the 90s. We have the best record since the early 2000s. I have no problem with him staying. My only problem with him and any one in the front office is they haven't found a qb or been trying very hard to find one. He wasn't very good as a gm but as team president he has been fine
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 Spot on!! when he was the defacto "GM", I doubt he was much more than a sounding board for DJ and Nix. If them two would disagree, he may after listening to both sides be the tie breaker vote. That's why he he likely removed himself from that position. There's going to be alot of very disappointed people on this board next week as likely the only change that may occur is the replacing of Hackert and the offensive staff. Likely Whaley and RB will be back and I'd be very disappointed if they canned Whaley as they'd be hard pressed to find a better replacement and please don't suggest 70 year old Bill Pollian. I won't fault anyone for forming that perception but I can't ignore the abundance of chatter over the years over who actually called the shots while Brandon was GM. In absence of anything credible pointing to specific football decisions hes made, I don't put much weight on the easy connect the dots.
Proteus Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 I don't care if he was only the defacto GM. He has been the face of the franchise for about the last 5-6 years. He has had a major role in the organization during the entire playoff drought. When you hear him on the radio and other media outlets, he talks like he is still running the show. I am sorry but we can't keep this guy. He may be a very good marketer, a nice guy and all that other jazz. The simple fact is he has been a major part of the losing culture that has persisted for the last 15 years. The last time a team had a playoff drought that lasted this long was in the mid 80's. The last decade and a 1/2 has been historically bad. I will be worried that Pegula is too nice if he doesn't drop the hammer on Brandon. I really like Whaley but I would have no problem showing him the door as well.
CardinalScotts Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 of course he's working on Marrone coming back he's trying to help build a successful team you don't get rid of the guy who's turned the culture and put in a non losing season for the first time in 10 years...but some act like we have an all pro qb and should be winning more.
apuszczalowski Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 More genius posts here about knowing exactly what role someone in the organization involved and how they are the reason for the team not being successful. Russ Brandon is far from the problem here and won't be let go unless he wants to go. No one here knows how much of a football knowledge the guy actually has, they just assume since he has a background in business he knows nothing while giving their opinions on the football side of things based off of their experience running their fantasy team and reading websites for "insider info" He is also not or ever been the "face of the franchise", ask football fans outside of Buffalo who Russ Brandon is and I bet 99% of the response would be "who?" You could call Fred Jackson the "face of the franchise", and he has been on the field through a lot of the bad, should he be run out of town too? At least he suits up and plays the game and is part of the wins and losses........
Proteus Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 More genius posts here about knowing exactly what role someone in the organization involved and how they are the reason for the team not being successful. Russ Brandon is far from the problem here and won't be let go unless he wants to go. No one here knows how much of a football knowledge the guy actually has, they just assume since he has a background in business he knows nothing while giving their opinions on the football side of things based off of their experience running their fantasy team and reading websites for "insider info" He is also not or ever been the "face of the franchise", ask football fans outside of Buffalo who Russ Brandon is and I bet 99% of the response would be "who?" You could call Fred Jackson the "face of the franchise", and he has been on the field through a lot of the bad, should he be run out of town too? At least he suits up and plays the game and is part of the wins and losses........ So any post you don't agree with you feel the need to insult the poster by sarcastically calling his post "genius level"? Grow up dude. But that is besides the point. People outside of Buffalo don't know who Russ Brandon is, so he is not the face of the franchise? He has been the one holding all the major press conferences over the last few years and the one pumping up his chest about how he and those under are going to turn this franchise around. We are not talking about players here. I think it is pretty obvious the players aren't the ones who make free agent and draft decisions, just like they don't hire the head coaches and general managers. Your Fred Jackson point is just ridiculous. How about Nix, Whaley and Marrone? They are all great too right? Anyone who criticizes them must be making a "genius post". Everything they did was so wonderful and the Bills still missing the playoffs is just bad luck. What I think is you are a giant homer. You have made up your mind that Brandon is great and the Bills can do no wrong.
Recommended Posts