Doug Flutie Band Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Don't forget about Brohm, Lewis, and Tuel! It's been a bad 10 years. FlutieJohnsonBledsoe was a paradise of QB talent compared to the last 10 years.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Don't forget about Brohm, Lewis, and Tuel! It's been a bad 10 years. FlutieJohnsonBledsoe was a paradise of QB talent compared to the last 10 years. pretty much, so sad
thewildrabbit Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Look at the coaching staff over that time frame, all the lowest cost hires in the league. You get what you pay for in this life. Because the coaching staffs stink so badly, then so do the draft picks, the O lines, the QB's, and it all starts at the top.
RealityCheck Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Look at the coaching staff over that time frame, all the lowest cost hires in the league. You get what you pay for in this life. Because the coaching staffs stink so badly, then so do the draft picks, the O lines, the QB's, and it all starts at the top. I think that this is more accurate for college coaches. I agree that Marrone has revealed himself to have some profound limitations when it comes to game day decisions. His mentality on 4th and short is disappointing, and then when they do go for it, they call something obvious, which in the pursuit of winning ironically is actually the high risk play. The strange thing is that of all the obvious rubbish that gets called on 4th and short, the QB sneak is actually effective often times despite this. Of course, they don't use that play for what ever reason. Marrone has an overall, outdated mental template for risk assessment when it comes to who to dress on Sundays and in game play calls when the scoreboard and the clock become bigger factors. An ultra-conservative game plan in today's NFL in many ways is the high risk, low reward way to go against many teams if your goal really is to try and win.
Recommended Posts