YoloinOhio Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 So, uhh...anyone care to change their vote? uhhhh no
bananathumb Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 He is not the best LB in the league. Only time I've seen Mack play, but I know I saw the best player on either team today.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Idk who's the best but he's damn good. Showed technique and smarts today that's way beyond a rookie. That's fine. I'd rather have Kiko, Bradham, Brown and Sammy than Mack and no first rounder next year.
bigK14094 Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 The last two weeks, Watkins has falled down a lot....whats with that....I mean, untouched.......something wrong here...his mind trying to do things he can't do. Concerns me he doesn't have the body control to avoid that......
Maury Ballstein Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 So, uhh...anyone care to change their vote? Nope. You and the 3.5 % are holding strong. Did you boo Sammy for that td to start the game ?
negativo Posted December 22, 2014 Author Posted December 22, 2014 I will say this...I'd rather have Sammy than Clowney. lol
peterpan Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 The bill shomers are out in full force. Mack just dominated our offense today. Beckum Jr jus tlit it up, again, for over 100 and 2 more TDs. Sammy isn;t producing in like those guys. Its like Pop Warner v D 1 college. Bring out the excuses. He doesnt have this he doesnt have that. Yadda yadda yadda. Show me the dang baby I am tired of excuses.
Hazed and Amuzed Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Effff Khalil Mack. Don't get the crotch riders of this guy. He may have played for UB but he's a Floridian and now a Californian. He's a good rookie yes, but there are a lot of good rookies this year and we don't need a linebacker. We are talented at LB, we needed a WR. Whether or not we should have drafted that guard from Auburn is a better argument. Who the hell cares about Khalil Mack?
zow2 Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Mack was really disruptive...he's a physical specimen. He's already one of the better LB's in the NFL. I would not, however, have traded a 1st round pick to move up and draft a LB. In hindsight, the better play was to just pick at #9 and take Beckham. Still, Watkins is an amazing talent and I think he's underutilized in Buffalo. Most of the downfield throws to him are poor. If you can get the ball in his range he can high point it and outmuscle guys. Too often Orton or EJ overthrows it or it's thrown out of bounds.
Snorom Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Sammy is a dynamic play maker and will be our starting WR for years Mack abused our piss poor excuse for an OL Heck I would not be upset with Mack but I am not upset at all that we have Sammy. We have a great defense we didn't need another defender, All this team needs is a real franchise QB, Watkins will be putting up 100 catch 15 TD seasons for us..
chef4131 Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 You simply don't make a trade where you have to give up substantially more than you should for any position except QB. Bills paid equal to a kings ransom. ha truly stings is he tremendous success of this years rookie WRs Future will only tell on trade, however 1 year in makes you re-think this trade
negativo Posted December 22, 2014 Author Posted December 22, 2014 http://www.buffaloru...mack-derek-carr What have the early returns and reviews been like for UB product Khalil Mack in his rookie season?Damien: Better than they could have expected. If teams realized he was going to be as dominant as he is on the NFL level, he never would have been on the board at the fifth overall pick. He would be a Texan right now. I have personally described him as nearly unblockable, and Pete Carroll said almost that exact same sentiment about him. Brian Hoyer said Mack earned the respect of himself and the entire Browns locker room after they faced him earlier this season. He is among the favorites for Defensive Rookie of the Year. It’s rather ironic; had the Bills had drafted him, I have little doubt he would be the unanimous choice. I say that because the Bills traded ahead of the Raiders to take someone else, though drafting Mack may not have made the most sense for them. If he were with the Bills right now, he would probably be a lock for Rookie of the Year. With the Raiders, he is the focal point of opposing offenses, and yet he still puts up good numbers.
thebandit27 Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 http://www.buffaloru...mack-derek-carr You're the one that asked everyone else--that's probably worth remembering as you chastise everyone else's opinion(s).
Maury Ballstein Posted December 28, 2014 Posted December 28, 2014 Khalil Mack would have scored there.
Recommended Posts