DC Tom Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jeb-bush-actively-explore-possibility-running-president/story?id=27633330 I'm seriously considering starting a PAC who's sole purpose is to keep the Bushes and Clintons out of the White House. "Just Say No to Bush/Clinton Oligarchy!"
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 3:27 PM, DC Tom said: http://abcnews.go.co...ory?id=27633330 I'm seriously considering starting a PAC who's sole purpose is to keep the Bushes and Clintons out of the White House. "Just Say No to Bush/Clinton Oligarchy!" Who cares, the guy has no chance, ergo, this is a clever way to be 100% anti-Clinton while looking fair and balanced. Fail
B-Man Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 Tom is correct. Just say no to electoral dynasties. .
TPS Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 3:27 PM, DC Tom said: http://abcnews.go.co...ory?id=27633330 I'm seriously considering starting a PAC who's sole purpose is to keep the Bushes and Clintons out of the White House. "Just Say No to Bush/Clinton Oligarchy!" Unfortunately that's probably the sentiment that got Obama in...
B-Man Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 Heh................... Quote Dan McLaughlin @baseballcrank · 8m 8 minutes ago Millennials can relate to Jeb because they, too, promised their parents they'd be looking for a job by Christmas. 0 replies 17 retweets 11 favorites
GG Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 3:56 PM, TPS said: Unfortunately that's probably the sentiment that got Obama in... Yup. Wow, we agree twice in a week?
TPS Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 4:39 PM, GG said: Yup. Wow, we agree twice in a week? you're wrong! The last one wasn't an agreement.
DC Tom Posted December 16, 2014 Author Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 3:56 PM, TPS said: Unfortunately that's probably the sentiment that got Obama in... That is a good point. Not entirely accurate, as my sentiment isn't against any specific person, but anti-oligarchy. But hardly invalid, I'll give you that.
B-Man Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 The Media has made the Bush name unelectable going forward. That explains why media is gushing for Jeb today. If it ends up "Bush vs Clinton................................then I'm voting Perot............................Lol
DC Tom Posted December 16, 2014 Author Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 5:21 PM, B-Man said: The Media has made the Bush name unelectable going forward. That explains why media is gushing for Jeb today. If it ends up "Bush vs Clinton................................then I'm voting Perot............................Lol If it ends up Bush v Clinton, I'lll nuke the damn party conventions.
TPS Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 5:19 PM, DC Tom said: That is a good point. Not entirely accurate, as my sentiment isn't against any specific person, but anti-oligarchy. But hardly invalid, I'll give you that. I got off of the floor and stopped reading after "good point"....
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 3:56 PM, TPS said: Unfortunately that's probably the sentiment that got Obama in... Which was better than the sentiment that got us the President before him
DC Tom Posted December 16, 2014 Author Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 6:14 PM, TPS said: I got off of the floor and stopped reading after "good point".... You think you're shocked? I had to type that...
Chef Jim Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 3:27 PM, DC Tom said: http://abcnews.go.co...ory?id=27633330 I'm seriously considering starting a PAC who's sole purpose is to keep the Bushes and Clintons out of the White House. "Just Say No to Bush/Clinton Oligarchy!" I know I'm an old fart but isn't there supposed to be a # in there someplace?
/dev/null Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 At this point, what difference does it make?
OCinBuffalo Posted December 17, 2014 Posted December 17, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 11:14 PM, /dev/null said: At this point, what difference does it make? We need a PPP-specific sound effect .mp3 every time somebody says this. This is a PPP must have.. Ideas/suggestions, then narrow it down, and we need a vote on this. Twould(this is the time of year for "tw"ing things) be even better if, as you scroll through posts, when you get to the element with this in it, the sound effect goes off automatically. I could do it, but I highly doubt they would let me anywhere near the code for this site.
/dev/null Posted December 17, 2014 Posted December 17, 2014 On 12/17/2014 at 2:06 AM, OCinBuffalo said: We need a PPP-specific sound effect .mp3 every time somebody says this. This is a PPP must have.. Ideas/suggestions, then narrow it down, and we need a vote on this. Twould(this is the time of year for "tw"ing things) be even better if, as you scroll through posts, when you get to the element with this in it, the sound effect goes off automatically. I could do it, but I highly doubt they would let me anywhere near the code for this site. Here's my suggestion
KD in CA Posted December 17, 2014 Posted December 17, 2014 On 12/16/2014 at 7:08 PM, gatorman said: Which was better than the sentiment that got us the President before him I disagree. ALGORE sucks was a much better sentiment than 'not another Clinton'.
B-Man Posted December 17, 2014 Posted December 17, 2014 LOL...........Here the country is demonstrably fed up with Washington and the status quo and the two major parties are offering up another Bush and another Clinton. Brilliant ! pic.twitter.com/jFGFJ2U4c5 .
Magox Posted December 17, 2014 Posted December 17, 2014 Jeb is policy driven and full of substance. Therefore he won't be elected.
Recommended Posts