Jump to content

Unsportsman like conduct


Recommended Posts

The Robey call was close but a bad call. The Gilmore call was very close but a bad call. The Gilmore one was somewhat understandable because at real speed it looked like he took his head off. On replay it was clearly a bad call. But both were close. We were killed by the two blocks in the back but we never saw replays. We can't say at all if they were bad calls. It's impossible to believe in a conspiracy though.

I'm shocked, shocked that there's gambling going on in this establishment...there is money to be made. It doesn't have to be a conspiracy. Money is made in a lot of ways.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

 

 

Hughes seems to be a marked man this year. For all we know, he talked to a teammate and drew a taunting penalty.

 

I'd hope marrone wouldn't bench him for that - and he did disappear while posters said reporters confirmed it was a conduct benching

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Marrone denies it was a discpline thing by him. Maybe Schwartz?

 

I dunno, but it's definitely the story from that play -- not a tough bang-bang call for the refs or sanders bow. Marrone should answer why hughes was gone for so long. If he's hiding behind semantics and it was Schwartz..... Lame.

Edited by NoSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, but it's definitely the story from that play -- not a tough bang-bang call for the refs or sanders bow. Marrone should answer why hughes was gone for so long. If he's hiding behind semantics and it was Schwartz..... Lame.

 

Maybe. Who knows how fired up Jerry was though. He could've easily been agitated enough to get another flag or two, and ejected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I dunno, but it's definitely the story from that play -- not a tough bang-bang call for the refs or sanders bow. Marrone should answer why hughes was gone for so long. If he's hiding behind semantics and it was Schwartz..... Lame.

Even if it was Schwartz he should overrule him. Hughes cannot be benched in this game. This is not a time to make a statement. And it could also make Hughes not want to come back here. Certain guys play with emotion. Hughes does. Bradham does. You don't bench them for one penalty even if they have a history of penalties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Even if it was Schwartz he should overrule him. Hughes cannot be benched in this game. This is not a time to make a statement. And it could also make Hughes not want to come back here. Certain guys play with emotion. Hughes does. Bradham does. You don't bench them for one penalty even if they have a history of penalties.

 

If FC can elaborate- did marrone say anything beyond "I did not punish him"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If FC can elaborate- did marrone say anything beyond "I did not punish him"?

 

http://espn.go.com/b...sciplined-by-me

 

 

"I wasn't aware of any substitutional issue," Marrone said after the game. "It was definitely not a discipline thing, at least from my end, from what I was talking about. I'm trying to manage the whole game. I'd have to go back and talk to the defensive coaches."

 

As a follow-up, a reporter asked if a position coach could bench a player without the head coach knowing.

 

"Probably no," Marrone said. "Not without me knowing about it, if you bench him."

 

After that play, I just said, 'Hey, let's get Jerry on the sideline, let's calm him down, we can't afford to lose him. And then let's go,'" Marrone explained.

 

Kind of a shame, they picked on Manny until Hughes came back.

Edited by FireChan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

next half? He was on the field on the same TD drive where Lawson was mugged by the RT.

 

You sure? My first sighting was late 3rd quarter(?). The penalty was early/mid second? That seems to match what other posters saw

 

From Vic Carrucci: #Bills coach Doug Marrone sends strong message to Hughes & rest of team by benching DE after his unsportsmanlike conduct.

 

 

 

http://espn.go.com/b...sciplined-by-me

 

 

"I wasn't aware of any substitutional issue," Marrone said after the game. "It was definitely not a discipline thing, at least from my end, from what I was talking about. I'm trying to manage the whole game. I'd have to go back and talk to the defensive coaches."

 

As a follow-up, a reporter asked if a position coach could bench a player without the head coach knowing.

 

"Probably no," Marrone said. "Not without me knowing about it, if you bench him."

 

After that play, I just said, 'Hey, let's get Jerry on the sideline, let's calm him down, we can't afford to lose him. And then let's go,'" Marrone explained.

 

Kind of a shame, they picked on Manny until Hughes came back.

 

Thanks for grabbing the quote. If I missed him on other drives it might make sense but it seemed he missed a good chunk of time

 

Marrone must've forgotten to tell them to put him back in!

Edited by NoSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You sure? My first sighting was mid/late 3rd quarter. The penalty was early/mid second? That seems to match what other posters saw

 

From Vic Carrucci: #Bills coach Doug Marrone sends strong message to Hughes & rest of team by benching DE after his unsportsmanlike conduct.

 

 

 

Thanks for grabbing the quote. If I missed him on other drives it might make sense but it seemed he missed a good chunk of time

 

No idea how long he missed. Of course, Rodak doesn't report that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You sure? My first sighting was late 3rd quarter(?). The penalty was early/mid second? That seems to match what other posters saw

 

From Vic Carrucci: #Bills coach Doug Marrone sends strong message to Hughes & rest of team by benching DE after his unsportsmanlike conduct.

I did not see him until late 3 early 4.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were several that made a point of it in the game thread when he reappeared - and a few discussing how long he was gone. I'm curious to confirm now....

 

Just went through, should have quoted but just copied the text real quick:

 

Posted Today, 03:37 PM

Hughes finally back in!

 

A few other posts followed. So that's the 4th right?

 

Edit: Should clarify that I am west coast.

Edited by Big C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not see him until late 3 early 4.

 

Yea - I wrote that without much thought. I think I was overly conservative in the estimation looking back. I think early 4 was the reappearance as I rememver thinking "wow, 2 quarters out" which would match early 4 like you and C both remember

 

 

 

Just went through, should have quoted but just copied the text real quick:

 

Posted Today, 03:37 PM

Hughes finally back in!

 

A few other posts followed. So that's the 4th right?

 

Edit: Should clarify that I am west coast.

 

Pretty sure you were right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...