ICanSleepWhenI'mDead Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 OK, I don't expect the Bills to hire a rocket surgeon to write articles for them, but this may be about the dumbest thing ever written: http://www.buffalobills.com/news/article-1/Scouting-Report-Bills-at-Broncos/ed9f4a73-1ad0-4519-b90c-d1c6c3be4e2a . . . Buffalo has to keep drives alive to not only finish them with points, but more importantly to keep the ball out of the hands of Peyton Manning and the Broncos offense. . . . So it's more important for the offense to win time of possession than to score points? Really?
You herd it hear last Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 When the final score is 3-0 Bills and a 3:1 TOP ratio to boot, that guy'll be laughing all the way to the bank. You'll see. Just wait.
boyst Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 How do you get that box before the title like that?
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 When the final score is 3-0 Bills and a 3:1 TOP ratio to boot, that guy'll be laughing all the way to the bank. You'll see. Just wait. LoL! Exactly what I was thinking. 1981... Broncos @ Bills... Bills win: 9-7. Take that! Chuck Knox baby!
Augie Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 We can take all day to score 3. If they score 7 every time we're in trouble. I love our D, and I'd like Peyton to have a very unpleasant day. I don't hope to maim, but I'd like to see his back up as well.
mikemac2001 Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 (edited) I get the theory But we need long drives with tds and we need to have last possessions before half and game with scores A 10 min drive that scores 3 at the end of the half might be worth it if it doesn't give manning two chances to score (two drives because we can't move the ball) Edited December 6, 2014 by mikemac2001
Talley56 Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 At the risk of sounding really dumb myself I actually agree with that strategy. I've always thought one of the best ways to beat a good QB was to not let him on the field. It worked well for the Giants in SB 25.
BuffaloFan68 Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 Sad part is that I've had more confidence with our D's chances of scoring lately than our Offense.
zippyjim Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 Sad part is that I've had more confidence with our D's chances of scoring lately than our Offense. You make a good point. Jerry Hughes has had more touchdowns in the month of November than Sammy.
BuffaninATL Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 LoL! Exactly what I was thinking. 1981... Broncos @ Bills... Bills win: 9-7. Take that! Chuck Knox baby! I was at that game with my bro, Dad, and Uncle at the ripe old age o 13 - thanks for the post ! OK, I don't expect the Bills to hire a rocket surgeon to write articles for them, but this may be about the dumbest thing ever written: http://www.buffalobi...0c-d1c6c3be4e2a So it's more important for the offense to win time of possession than to score points? Really? Chris Brown = the Cap'n Obvious of Bills' beat reporters.....
Billsfan369 Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 We can take all day to score 3. If they score 7 every time we're in trouble. I love our D, and I'd like Peyton to have a very unpleasant day. I don't hope to maim, but I'd like to see his back up as well. Down goes Manning Down goes Manning But he will pop back up
ganesh Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 We can take all day to score 3. If they score 7 every time we're in trouble. I love our D, and I'd like Peyton to have a very unpleasant day. I don't hope to maim, but I'd like to see his back up as well. Actually the Bills have to stop CJ Anderson tomorrow. He has been their best player the past couple of weeks and they are riding his cotails.
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 6, 2014 Posted December 6, 2014 I was at that game with my bro, Dad, and Uncle at the ripe old age o 13 - thanks for the post ! Same here! I was 13 too... I remember that game vividly! LoL
Recommended Posts