stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 Time for this to go back to PPP.... hmmm, let's see: 1) George Bush is a moron. 2) Republicans are morons 3) I can't believe Bush is gonna be on my TV tonight, looking like a retarded monkey, when I'm sure other good shows will be on. yeah, that should do. 226473[/snapback] If you are lucky, he will present the Democratic Party's plan to save Social Security. You certainly know what that is, right? Maybe you can tell us posters exactly what that is...right?
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 If you are lucky, he will present the Democratic Party's plan to save Social Security. You certainly know what that is, right? Maybe you can tell us posters exactly what that is...right? 226485[/snapback] Since I'm young enough to realize I will never see a dime of my Soc Security, I'll take the 'I don't care' approach. But man, did you ever jump for that bait, didn't you? haha
stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 Since I'm young enough to realize I will never see a dime of my Soc Security, I'll take the 'I don't care' approach. But man, did you ever jump for that bait, didn't you? haha 226488[/snapback] Nice try at recovery. The question is valid despite your self-stroking flippancy in the face of facts. Since you criticize your evident political opposition, how about putting forth the alternative? So how about your solution? I'd like to hear your considered soultion to the problem...you must have one, of course.
IDBillzFan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 Since I'm young enough to realize I will never see a dime of my Soc Security, I'll take the 'I don't care' approach. But man, did you ever jump for that bait, didn't you? haha 226488[/snapback] You do realize, of course, that your liberal party is the reason we have to take steps to save Social Security, right?
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 Nice try at recovery. The question is valid despite your self-stroking flippancy in the face of facts. Since you criticze your evident political opposition, how about putting forth the alternative? It's what men do. So how about your solution? 226493[/snapback] Nice try at thinking I really care. I don't. I think the state this country is in is much worse than when Bush took office. I don't like Kerry, but it couldn't be worse. Great, Iraq had a vote the other day. Like that was really our objective going in. Oh wait, it was to get those WMD. The pesky little fact that they don't/didn't exist didn't seem to sway old GWB. Great, the Iraqis voted. I'm sure the family's of all the service men who died will sleep easier knowing that. . .
taterhill Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 young biz owners get double screwed...as I have to put both sides of FICA into this pit...not good times
KRC Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 If you are lucky, he will present the Democratic Party's plan to save Social Security. You certainly know what that is, right? 226485[/snapback] Last I heard, it was raise taxes and cut benefits.
stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 Nice try at thinking I really care. I don't. I think the state this country is in is much worse than when Bush took office. I don't like Kerry, but it couldn't be worse. Great, Iraq had a vote the other day. Like that was really our objective going in. Oh wait, it was to get those WMD. The pesky little fact that they don't/didn't exist didn't seem to sway old GWB. Great, the Iraqis voted. I'm sure the family's of all the service men who died will sleep easier knowing that. . . 226497[/snapback] Fair answer, but please stop the spew against the current administration. Your Dem's have done NOTHING in their 50+ years ruling the roost. We are not enemies, Steve, but if you were my kid I would have slapped some sense into you on selected occasions.
erynthered Posted February 2, 2005 Author Posted February 2, 2005 <sarcasm> what a great thread <sarcasm> 226500[/snapback] It was going fine till sh*t for brains decided to throw politics in here.
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 It was going fine till sh*t for brains decided to throw politics in here. 226504[/snapback] I just wanted to set a precedent by having a thread bounced THREE times...
erynthered Posted February 2, 2005 Author Posted February 2, 2005 I just wanted to set a precedent by having a thread bounced THREE times... 226507[/snapback] Its ironic that you respond to "Sh*t for brains"
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 Its ironic that you respond to "Sh*t for brains" 226509[/snapback] Ironic? no... creature of habit? most certainly.
Alaska Darin Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 I don't like Kerry, but it couldn't be worse. 226497[/snapback] Open a history book. You should be ashamed of the ignorance of that comment.
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 Open a history book. You should be ashamed of the ignorance of that comment. 226513[/snapback] You should know by now that I have no shame.
Alaska Darin Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 You should know by now that I have no shame. 226514[/snapback] It'll come with maturity.
KRC Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 You should know by now that I have no shame. 226514[/snapback] He does have a point there, Darin.
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 It'll come with maturity. 226516[/snapback] My point wasn't that it has NEVER been worse. My point is, I don't feel anyone else could have taken the current situation and done any worse with it. What could we have done WORSE than what we did in Iraq? Bush attacked a country that didn't attack us first (I'm almost sure there is international law against that). Now, I'm not saying we should wait to be the victim before striking back. What I am saying is we should have some proof that they may, or even have the capacity to do so. We went it with the purpose of finding WMD. When we found there weren't any, did we leave? Or even stop sending troops? Nope, we sent more, and for what? So the Iraqis could vote? Fantastic. How could anyone else done worse? Went in ever EARLIER than bush did without UN support?
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 For some reason, I thinks you are wrong. You are certainly a snot. 226525[/snapback] say what?
Alaska Darin Posted February 2, 2005 Posted February 2, 2005 My point wasn't that it has NEVER been worse. My point is, I don't feel anyone else could have taken the current situation and done any worse with it. What could we have done WORSE than what we did in Iraq? Bush attacked a country that didn't attack us first (I'm almost sure there is international law against that). Now, I'm not saying we should wait to be the victim before striking back. What I am saying is we should have some proof that they may, or even have the capacity to do so. We went it with the purpose of finding WMD. When we found there weren't any, did we leave? Or even stop sending troops? Nope, we sent more, and for what? So the Iraqis could vote? Fantastic. How could anyone else done worse? Went in ever EARLIER than bush did without UN support? 226521[/snapback] Please stop watching cable news.
Recommended Posts