B-Man Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Justice Scalia and Climate Change One of Justice Antonin Scalia’s last official acts may be among the most important of his distinguished career. Last week, he joined with four other justices to halt implementation of President Obama’s new carbon regulation for so long as it is under legal review — an unprecedented move to stay an unprecedented federal overreach into states’ energy decisions. Titled by the administration the “Clean Power Plan,” the regulation would be one of the costliest ever, dramatically increasing electricity prices across the nation — all while producing essentially zero climate benefits, according to the Environmental Protection Agency’s own models. Thanks to Justice Scalia and the four other justices who voted with him, Americans won the first battle against this reckless plan. But the fight is far from over. Even though the Supreme Court is not expected to issue a final ruling until at least 2017, the EPA is essentially flouting the stay order and encouraging states to continue developing their plans. State officials — governors, legislators, regulatory agencies, public-utilities commissions, and utilities themselves — should reject the EPA’s offers of assistance. In fact, they should be issuing stop-work orders to prevent the regulation’s implementation until the courts have completed a full review.Read more at: http://www.nationalr...rbon-regulation
Tiberius Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Justice Scalia and Climate Change One of Justice Antonin Scalia’s last official acts may be among the most important of his distinguished career. Last week, he joined with four other justices to halt implementation of President Obama’s new carbon regulation for so long as it is under legal review — an unprecedented move to stay an unprecedented federal overreach into states’ energy decisions. Titled by the administration the “Clean Power Plan,” the regulation would be one of the costliest ever, dramatically increasing electricity prices across the nation — all while producing essentially zero climate benefits, according to the Environmental Protection Agency’s own models. Thanks to Justice Scalia and the four other justices who voted with him, Americans won the first battle against this reckless plan. But the fight is far from over. Even though the Supreme Court is not expected to issue a final ruling until at least 2017, the EPA is essentially flouting the stay order and encouraging states to continue developing their plans. State officials — governors, legislators, regulatory agencies, public-utilities commissions, and utilities themselves — should reject the EPA’s offers of assistance. In fact, they should be issuing stop-work orders to prevent the regulation’s implementation until the courts have completed a full review. Read more at: http://www.nationalr...rbon-regulation Reckless? Oh brother! Clean air is reckless now? Here's a better way of looking at it http://www.vox.com/2016/2/24/11107908/department-of-energy-posters
Chef Jim Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Reckless? Oh brother! Clean air is reckless now? Here's a better way of looking at it http://www.vox.com/2016/2/24/11107908/department-of-energy-posters Yes because cleaning up the air is what is reckless about the plan.
B-Man Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Yes because cleaning up the air is what is reckless about the plan. Don't bother, misinterpretation is his shtick Meanwhile........ ‘Global warming’ could cause humans to develop webbed feet, cat’s eyes and gills Climate Depot ^ Hilarious picture with the article................. Mother JonesVerified account @MotherJones 12h12 hours ago The oceans are rising faster than they have in 2,800 years—but Republicans are still in a fantasy world. http://bit.ly/1PW3n4H Well.......I'm convinced...
B-Man Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 The Paris climate deal won’t even dent global warming. by Bjorn Lomborg
Tiberius Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Yes because cleaning up the air is what is reckless about the plan. The only thing you even know about the plan is that Obama wants it. So you are mindlessly against it
Chef Jim Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 The only thing you even know about the plan is that Obama wants it. So you are mindlessly against it Where did I say I didn't like the plan or the fact that I had any idea that Obama had anything to do with it. I didn't know and the reason is I didn't read anything about it. I just picked up the fact that your post was pulled right out of your manatee idea ball tank once again. So you are 100% wrong with your assumption.........once again.
Tiberius Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Where did I say I didn't like the plan or the fact that I had any idea that Obama had anything to do with it. I didn't know and the reason is I didn't read anything about it. I just picked up the fact that your post was pulled right out of your manatee idea ball tank once again. So you are 100% wrong with your assumption.........once again. No, I'm totally right. It's Obama's plan and therefore you are against it. Ignorant
Chef Jim Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 No, I'm totally right. It's Obama's plan and therefore you are against it. Ignorant I had no idea about this plan and that Obama was associated with it. But other than that you're 100% spot on! BTW I'm confused. Did Obama just want the plan or was it his plan. See I didn't read the plan or know anything about it so I could use some clarification.
B-Man Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 I had no idea about this plan and that Obama was associated with it. But other than that you're 100% spot on! BTW I'm confused. Did Obama just want the plan or was it his plan. See I didn't read the plan or know anything about it so I could use some clarification. CJ, why do you encourage him to follow the squirrel that he introduced ? Titled by the administration the “Clean Power Plan,” the regulation would be one of the costliest ever, dramatically increasing electricity prices across the nation — all while producing essentially zero climate benefits, according to the Environmental Protection Agency’s own models. That was the essence of the article. Gator's predictable, mindless "so you're against clean air" was best ignored. or ridiculed ............since you prefer that approach. But now it's just sad. .
Chef Jim Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 CJ, why do you encourage him to follow the squirrel that he introduced ? . One of the most entertaining things is watching my cat chase her tail. Seeing I'm at work now I needed gator to provide that entertainment. Just as long as he let's me know before he licks his butt so I can turn away we're good.
keepthefaith Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 The only thing you even know about the plan is that Obama wants it. So you are mindlessly against it Which is actually not a bad position. Obama has a very reliable track record of being on the wrong side of the right issues or spending time on low priority issues. With that people are tuning him out.
IDBillzFan Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Which is actually not a bad position. Obama has a very reliable track record of being on the wrong side of the right issues or spending time on low priority issues. With that people are tuning him out. I thought they were tuning him out because he's black.
Azalin Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 I thought they were tuning him out because he's black. Isn't it funny how conservatives, libertarians, and independents see the president as an incompetent, bumbling, narcissistic, idealologue, but liberals, socialists, and democrats see him as a black guy?
Chef Jim Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Isn't it funny how conservatives, libertarians, and independents see the president as an incompetent, bumbling, narcissistic, idealologue, but liberals, socialists, and democrats see him as a black guy? He's black?!?!
DC Tom Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 Isn't it funny how conservatives, libertarians, and independents see the president as an incompetent, bumbling, narcissistic, idealologue, but liberals, socialists, and democrats see him as a black guy? That's because "incompetent," "bumbling," "narcissistic," and "idealogue" are code-words for "black." But "black" is a code word for "progressive." [/CRT]
Chef Jim Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 That's because "incompetent," "bumbling," "narcissistic," and "idealogue" are code-words for "black." But "black" is a code word for "progressive." [/CRT] Put That !@#$ing Book Down !!!
B-Man Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 (edited) One of the most entertaining things is watching my cat chase her tail. Seeing I'm at work now I needed gator to provide that entertainment. Just as long as he let's me know before he licks his butt so I can turn away we're good. Edited February 26, 2016 by B-Man
Recommended Posts