4th&long Posted May 10 Posted May 10 55 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Very cool and normal! Holy cow 116* in may? I count live there, summer will be unbearable.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted May 10 Posted May 10 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: “war on the west” LMFAOOOOOOO Kids on college campus across America chanting death to America is completely normal right? 1
B-Man Posted May 10 Posted May 10 8 minutes ago, Roundybout said: “war on the west” LMFAOOOOOOO I'll let you answer that. 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: Got it, so you have no actual response except to gaslight. .
Roundybout Posted May 10 Posted May 10 5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Kids on college campus across America chanting death to America is completely normal right? What does this have to do with Ben Shapiro declaring clean energy to be a “war on the west?” 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: I'll let you answer that. . Dude come on, declaring the scientific progress of clean energy to be a “war on the west” is pathetic 1 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted May 10 Posted May 10 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What does this have to do with Ben Shapiro declaring clean energy to be a “war on the west?” Dude come on, declaring the scientific progress of clean energy to be a “war on the west” is pathetic Greta is at a anti Israel rally, how dense are u? 1
Roundybout Posted May 10 Posted May 10 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Greta is at ananti Israel rally, how dense are u? What does this have to do with climate?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted May 10 Posted May 10 28 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What does this have to do with climate? Did I post it? I was replying to your war on the west post specifically.
Tiberius Posted May 12 Posted May 12 https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/05/11/carbon-capture-climate-change-exxonmobil-montana/ The remote stretch of public grazing land in southeastern Montana has hardly changed since homesteading days, but underneath this wind-swept expanse lies a hidden asset in high demand: thousands of acres of porous rock where oil company executives say greenhouse gas could be piped in from afar and stored forever. ExxonMobil and the Biden administration see in the grassy 100,000 acres a launchpad for one of the world’s most audacious climate experiments, a plan to take emissions spewing from power plants and factories and trap them underground where they cannot contribute to global warming. The scheme is inching forward despite criticism it will permit polluters to keep polluting while slowing the transition to solar and wind energy. And now sponsors face the additional hurdle of intense local opposition. In the ranching community of Carter County, Mont., the prospect of shipping in all that carbon pollution and injecting it underneath an area called Snowy River is about as popular as an outbreak of hoof-and-mouth disease. “The question I keep hearing is, ‘Why are they making us the dumping ground for the rest of the country?’” said Rod Tauck, chairman of the Carter County Board of Commissioners and a descendant of homesteaders who more than a century ago settled his family ranch. “Not a single constituent I know wants this.” Such tensions are emerging nationwide, throwing an industrial-size wrench into the quest by the White House and major energy companies to advance a vast network of “carbon capture” infrastructure across the country. It would involve tens of thousands of miles of new pipelines, and scores of remote storage sites on the scale of Snowy River, targeted because the porous rock underneath them can act like a carbon sponge. This vision for using technology to reverse climate change was once viewed widely as far-fetched. Now, proposals to divert carbon dioxide from smokestacks to vast subterranean wells are regarded by the White House, the United Nations and the International Energy Agency as crucial to preserving any hope of meeting the world’s climate goals. The Biden administration’s plan to zero out emissions from the power grid by 2035 increasingly hinges on the success of colossal carbon capture deployment. The government has made billions of dollars of incentives available to motivate companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron to rapidly develop it. 1
njbuff Posted May 12 Posted May 12 On 5/10/2024 at 2:07 PM, Roundybout said: Very cool and normal! Texas getting hot isn't normal? Ok You and the other climate change mor0ns can keep playing these games but, throughout the history of this planet, the weather has changed, will change and will change FOREVER and we as humans have NO INFLUENCE whatsoever on it. Mother Nature does what she wants when she wants. Period. End of story. It's laughable how you people buy into the climate change bvllshit and it costs us money we can't afford to spend. 1 1 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted May 12 Posted May 12 5 minutes ago, njbuff said: Texas getting hot isn't normal? Ok You and the other climate change mor0ns can keep playing these games but, throughout the history of this planet, the weather has changed, will change and will change FOREVER and we as humans have NO INFLUENCE whatsoever on it. Mother Nature does what she wants when she wants. Period. End of story. It's laughable how you people buy into the climate change bvllshit and it costs us money we can't afford to spend. You sound almost exactly like a flat earther. 1
njbuff Posted May 12 Posted May 12 55 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: You sound almost exactly like a flat earther. Sure. No, the Earth is square. 😁 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 13 Posted May 13 15 hours ago, njbuff said: Texas getting hot isn't normal? Ok You and the other climate change mor0ns can keep playing these games but, throughout the history of this planet, the weather has changed, will change and will change FOREVER and we as humans have NO INFLUENCE whatsoever on it. Mother Nature does what she wants when she wants. Period. End of story. It's laughable how you people buy into the climate change bvllshit and it costs us money we can't afford to spend. That article indicates one of the hottest days was recorded in 1936. 2
All_Pro_Bills Posted May 13 Posted May 13 (edited) 41 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: That article indicates one of the hottest days was recorded in 1936. Its been much cooler than normal here in the Northeast but I've yet to hear anyone suggest we're on the verge of a major cyclical cooling trend or Ice Age. For me, whether or not the climate is changing, which it is always doing, and how much of it can be attributable to human activity is not the issue. Let's just say it is changing and end that debate. And get to the real matter for us all. The issue is the identification of the cause, burning fossil fuels, and the solution to that problem. Replacing fossil fuels with renewables. The climate cult is full of buzz words like "sustainable" and "renewable" but there's a hint of dishonesty in their messaging. They paint the picture of some seamless transition to renewables with few to no consequences to individuals or society as a whole. All we need to do is make the commitment to spend the money and make the effort to transform our society to net carbon zero or something like that. Another buzz term. Just unplug from gasoline and go with EV's and continue on our merry way without missing a beat. The physics of it all suggest renewables, wind and solar, are unreliable low energy output sources that will never be able to replace fossil fuels without making concessions regarding cost and mobility. Cultist cite expected technological improvements in battery storage efficiency in the future as thing that will save the day. Its a common theme, as masters of the universe our technology will always be available to solve every problem we encounter. So have no fear. The ecological and environmental cost of disposing of all those used batteries isn't discussed at all. But there will be consequences to everyone. One specific I'm still waiting to hear about is the fate of commercial air travel. Electric planes I expect all providing the same level of service as jet fuel. The unfortunate truth is many lifestyle changes and sacrifices will be required. The "smart" people driving these changes know that's the truth. But they fear sharing the need for drastic lifestyle changes and sacrifices will not sit well with the majority that will be hesitant to give up anything. So they keep quiet. The plan will provide lots of benefits with almost no costs. So don't ask any questions. Or you'll be cast as a climate denier. And don't worry. The elites pushing the agenda, rest assured, will give up nothing. Another common theme. Edited May 13 by All_Pro_Bills 1
B-Man Posted May 16 Posted May 16 "We’re not judging you for the soap that you use. But, collectively, that can add up as billions of people wash their hands or bathe..." "... hundreds or thousands of times a year. If you’re so inclined, it makes sense to switch to a more eco-friendly product. Just understand that there may be a trade-off between sustainability and comfort. 'The consumer has to decide: Are they serious about where their soap comes from, whether it’s synthetic or natural?...'" From "Bar soap or body wash: Which is best for your skin and the planet? Depending on its ingredients and packaging, your soap could cut as much as a third of the carbon emissions from your next shower" (WaPo). https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2024/05/16/bar-soap-liquid-body-wash-sustainability/
Roundybout Posted May 16 Posted May 16 35 minutes ago, B-Man said: "We’re not judging you for the soap that you use. But, collectively, that can add up as billions of people wash their hands or bathe..." "... hundreds or thousands of times a year. If you’re so inclined, it makes sense to switch to a more eco-friendly product. Just understand that there may be a trade-off between sustainability and comfort. 'The consumer has to decide: Are they serious about where their soap comes from, whether it’s synthetic or natural?...'" From "Bar soap or body wash: Which is best for your skin and the planet? Depending on its ingredients and packaging, your soap could cut as much as a third of the carbon emissions from your next shower" (WaPo). https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2024/05/16/bar-soap-liquid-body-wash-sustainability/ Being more environmentally sustainable is bad! I fire up my coal-powered water heater every morning and only use soap made from veal fat 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted May 16 Posted May 16 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: Being more environmentally sustainable is bad! I fire up my coal-powered water heater every morning and only use soap made from veal fat Next thing you know they're gonna say pollution is bad! Ha! The gall of some people. I for one cannot wait until the oceans are choked with plastic and we chop down every last tree. River water should burn like battery acid I always say.
Tommy Callahan Posted May 16 Posted May 16 1 hour ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Next thing you know they're gonna say pollution is bad! Ha! The gall of some people. I for one cannot wait until the oceans are choked with plastic and we chop down every last tree. River water should burn like battery acid I always say. You ever research how much heat/polition is given off my military actions and training. And why that not even figured in the data. Do you realize how much energy ai data centers use and how much heat and pollution they produce? But no worries. Bidens green agenda provided subsidies for windmills and solar. And on the topic of climate. Who paid and why is the NY governor signing climate change contracts in Rome?
Recommended Posts