Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Global Warming Alarmist expect incidences of school bullying to steadily rise as children react violently to rising temperatures.

 

As people's eyes dry out from the warmer temperatures, people will blink more frequently. So their eyes will be open less often. So they won't be able to read as much, as quickly.

 

Global Warming will cause a decline in literacy rates.

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

But does climate change cause transactional sex?

 

Global Warming Alarmist expect incidences of school bullying to steadily rise as children react violently to rising temperatures.

 

 

As people's eyes dry out from the warmer temperatures, people will blink more frequently. So their eyes will be open less often. So they won't be able to read as much, as quickly.

 

Global Warming will cause a decline in literacy rates.

Ahh the wonderous transitive property. Is there anything it can't do?

 

 

Today I learned that Global Warmer is basically Chuck Norris.

Well, apparently it is limited, but only by the ability of its user.

 

 

Anyhow, anyone else see this little pissing contest spout up?

Pissant 2's response to Pissant A&B

 

And Pissant A&B's response back

 

Further proof of the transitive property's user limitation. New Rule: apparently, you can get in trouble for agreeing, but not agreeing vehemently enough, with The Tech?

 

(By the way, since Scientology and its tactics are the model by which the environmentalist cult is now 100% based upon: I will from here refer to AGW/"settled science"/Climate Change etc. as "The Tech". It is wholly appropriate, as Scientology's eternal excuse for their lack of reproducable experimental results is "They[we never find out who "they" are] Were Doing it Wrong"...which is oddly familiar to Communism's excuse. Therefore, the eternal rallying cry for Scientology, new and improved is: "The Tech is Standardized!".)

 

You see, the nature of Scientology's failure is NEVER in its design. After all, it was designed by L. Ron Hubbard, and he's ridden trains on Venus, so... Rather, it's always a pesky quality control issue. Somebody is always doing Scientology wrong, so it's illogical for us to expect it to produce stable, repeatable outcomes. It's always a problem of execution/quality, and therefore, constant effort is required(which of course costs constant $), to refine and standardize it.

 

Similarly with Global Warming, Pissant's A&B are "doing it wrong". The Tech is being standardized, and we don't need these guys coming along and talking about past temperature data in any other context than: it 100% proves AGW. And of course, since AGW is also being standardized, that requires constant effort, which also requires constant $.

 

Thank God, or L. Ron, for these scientists. We're lucky to have them, should pay them like CEOs, and go after anyone who denies their vaunted place in society.

 

If they continue, we're going to look into their backgrounds and find out what their crimes are, and what they are trying to hide.

Posted

SO PHYTOPLANKTON ARE ON DECLINE IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN, and it’s “possibly because of climate change.”

 

But the period in question, 1998 to 2014, is one in which there has been no global warming — it almost perfectly corresponds to the ever-lengthening “pause.”

 

 

So how can “climate change” be producing short-term results when climate hasn’t been changing over that period?

Posted

SO PHYTOPLANKTON ARE ON DECLINE IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN, and it’s “possibly because of climate change.”

 

But the period in question, 1998 to 2014, is one in which there has been no global warming — it almost perfectly corresponds to the ever-lengthening “pause.”

 

 

So how can “climate change” be producing short-term results when climate hasn’t been changing over that period?

Can God create a boulder so heavy that even He can't move it?

Posted

 

What does this have to do with global warming....I mean climate change?

This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it

Posted

This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it

You do realize that CA has gone through cycles of extended drought over the past 1000 years? Of course you don't.

Posted

You do realize that CA has gone through cycles of extended drought over the past 1000 years? Of course you don't.

 

It's almost as bad here in Austin. Of course, being a semi-arid climate with massive population growth has nothing to do with anything, so it must be climate change.

Posted

This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it

All the predictions I can find that predict the drought are dated after the start of the drought.

 

Before the drought, all the predictions were for excessive rain and flooding.

Posted

This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it

A good deal of California is nothing but a desert/irrigated desert. Farmers used to get water that was diverted from rivers. That is not happening now. Read up on the Delta Smelt for more information.

Posted

You do realize that CA has gone through cycles of extended drought over the past 1000 years? Of course you don't.

So what? That means this can't be global warming?

 

It's almost as bad here in Austin. Of course, being a semi-arid climate with massive population growth has nothing to do with anything, so it must be climate c

Austin is in Texas you moron, not California.

All the predictions I can find that predict the drought are dated after the start of the drought.

 

Before the drought, all the predictions were for excessive rain and flooding.

Sure Tom. Maybe that's just the way YOU read it. LOL

Posted

Reading g'man's responses to the three quotes in his post above just hammers home the fact he is spending too much time napping in study hall. I hope Mrs. Perry catches up with you soon!

Posted

That doesn't prove this isn't global warming. It could be

 

It could be unicorn farts too and you can't prove it can't be ..... :nana:

×
×
  • Create New...